NCT05389605|CompletedDMC
Outcomes of Local Perforator Flaps in Oncoplastic Surgery
A Single Centre Experience of Local Perforator Flaps in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery; a Cross-sectional Study
Loading search results
A Single Centre Experience of Local Perforator Flaps in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery; a Cross-sectional Study
Sponsor study identifier
observational
25
1 country
1
Study Start
April 18, 2020
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
June 29, 2021
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 30, 2021
Actual (reported)This is a single center experience of using local perforator flaps in partial breast reconstruction for breast tumors while evaluating cosmetic outcomes, patient satisfaction and well-being using a validated self-administered questionnaire.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
June 30, 2021
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
April 18, 2020
Actual (reported)June 29, 2021
Actual (reported)June 30, 2021
Actual (reported)May 10, 2022
Actual (reported)May 25, 2022
Actual (reported)Surgical techniques of pedicled local fasciocutaneous perforator flaps in partial breast reconstruction in terms of flap anatomy
Flap anatomy involves the type of flap
May 2018 to February 2021
Surgical techniques of pedicled local fasciocutaneous perforator flaps in partial breast reconstruction in terms of location of perforators
May 2018 to February 2021
Surgical techniques of pedicled local fasciocutaneous perforator flaps in partial breast reconstruction in terms of operative time
May 2018 to February 2021
This was an observational study, no intervention was done.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
All female patients who underwent a pedicled fasciocutaneous perforator flap for immediate partial breast reconstruction in the Breast section of The Aga Khan University Hospital were included in the study. For cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction, a follow-up of at least 3 months after surgery before participation in the survey was mandatory.
The Aga Khan University
Karachi, Sindh, 74800, Pakistan
Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Cronin WM. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995 Nov 30;333(22):1456-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199511303332203.
Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, Aguilar M, Marubini E. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 17;347(16):1227-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020989.
Sana Zeeshan, FCPS, FACS
Aga Khan University
25 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
May 10, 2022
First Posted
May 25, 2022
Study Start
April 18, 2020
Actual (reported)Pembrolizumab, IRX-2, and Chemotherapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Surgical techniques of pedicled local fasciocutaneous perforator flaps in partial breast reconstruction in terms of post-operative morbidities
May 2018 to February 2021
Cosmetic outcomes of patients following local perforator flaps in oncoplastic breast conserving surgery
April 2020 to June 2021
Patient satisfaction following local perforator flaps in oncoplastic breast conserving surgery
April 2020 to June 2021
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Esser JFS. Biological- or artery flaps of the face [Internet]. Monaco: Institut Esser de Chirurgie Structive; 1931 [cited 2022 Apr 27]. Available from: https://wellcomecollection.org/works/pf3qfx2r/items?canvas=7
Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, de Frene B, Roche N, Blondeel P, Monstrey S. The versatility of the inter-costal artery perforator (ICAP) flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(6):644-52. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2006.01.006. Epub 2006 Mar 22.
Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey S, Blondeel P. Pedicled perforator flaps in breast reconstruction: a new concept. Br J Plast Surg. 2004 Sep;57(6):531-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2004.04.015.
Losken A, Hamdi M. Partial breast reconstruction: current perspectives. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Sep;124(3):722-736. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b179d2.
McCulley SJ, Schaverien MV, Tan VK, Macmillan RD. Lateral thoracic artery perforator (LTAP) flap in partial breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 May;68(5):686-91. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
BREAST-Q ® VERSION 2.0 © Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and The University of British Columbia, 2017. All rights reserved
Pusic A, Klassen A, Cano S. BREAST-Q Version 2.0 © A Guide for Researchers and Clinicians [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 Apr 27]. Available from: https://qportfolio.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/BREAST-Q-USERS-GUIDE.pdf
Primary Completion
June 29, 2021
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 30, 2021
Actual (reported)Last Updated
May 27, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: