Feasibility of Telemedicine Under Ambulance Station Conditions
The Tele-senior EMS Physician as a Strategy for the Future of Disaster Medicine - a Study Testing the Feasibility of Telemedicine in Civil Defense: Feasibility of Telemedicine Under Ambulance Station Conditions
2 other identifiers
observational
404
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Our aim is to evaluate the feasibility of telemedicine in context of medical service in an ambulance station and in a further step in context of civil defense situations. The conditions in those situations are different to the usual usage of telemedicine in context of emergency medical services (EMS) like the "Telenotarzt" in Aachen. The medical personnel who are performing the medical treatment in ambulance stations or civil defense situations are most volunteers and are ordinarily not as experienced and educated as professional medical personnel in EMS. In case of civil defense situations, the personnel also must deal with shortage in material which we are not going to simulate in our study. The study will be realized at each one ambulance station at four large-scale events. Every time there will be a telemedicine workspace with an EMS-physician educated in telemedicine who can be contacted by briefed and equipped medical personnel according to the "TeleSAN"-standard. The emergency personnel start the patient's treatment according to their known standards and decide on their own whether they want to contact the tele-EMS-physician or not. Before starting the tele-consultation, every patient must declare his consent to the tele-consultation, otherwise tele-consultation cannot be realized, and the patient needs to be treated according to common standards. Due to spatial proximity of the telemedicine workspace and the ambulance station, the tele-EMS-physician can also work as an EMS-physician in the ambulance station if necessary. As a hypothesis we declare that telemedicine is feasible in context of an ambulance station. To evaluate the feasibility, we use patient's medical protocols, observations and surveys.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jul 2022
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 11, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 24, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 3, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 6, 2023
CompletedSeptember 8, 2023
September 1, 2023
2 days
May 11, 2022
September 5, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change of triage category using the German PRIOR algorithm (Primäres Ranking zur initialen Orientierung im Rettungsdienst)
Changes of the patient's medical condition will be measured using the german PRIOR algorithm which is used to triage patients in three categories: red, yellow and green. A change of triage category from red to yellow/green or from yellow to green means a better outcome, a change from green to yellow/red means a worse outcome.
through study completion, in total estimated 1 year
Improvement of vital signs
Changes of the patient's medical condition will be measured by analyzing changes in the patient's vital signs. Changes from unphysiological to physiological vital signs mean a better outcome.
through study completion, in total estimated 1 year
Improvement of NACA-Score (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics)
Changes of the patient's medical condition will be measured using the NACA-Score. Changes from a lower to a higher score means a worse outcome.
through study completion, in total estimated 1 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Usability of the telemedicine-devices and infrastructure and their reliable function
through study completion, in total estimated 1 year
Other Outcomes (7)
Time for treatment
through study completion, in total estimated 1 year
Experience and education
through study completion, in total estimated 1 year
Acceptance of telemedicine
through study completion, in total estimated 1 year
- +4 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention: Treatment with the aid of telemedicine
Telemedicine will be used to treat patients at an ambulance station. The medical interventions will be performed by a TeleSAN after delegation through a tele-EMS-physician if possible.
No intervention: Usual treatment
Treatment will be performed as usual without the usage of telemedicine.
Interventions
Telemedicine will be used to treat patients at an ambulance station. The medical interventions will be performed by a TeleSAN after delegation through a tele-EMS-physician if possible.
Eligibility Criteria
We assume a cohort out of the total of festival visitors which is composed of 16-40 years old people with occasional older visitors. The patient-collective can be composed of intoxications by alcohol or drugs and minor violations of the extremities. Effects of heat and light can occur as well. Only those who consent to our study can be part of it, therefore every patient has to give his or her consent to the evaluation of the already bespoken outcome measures and data acquisition.
You may qualify if:
- full legal age
- capacity to consent
You may not qualify if:
- apnea
- acute failure of breathing
- cardiac arrest
- STEMI
- unconsciousness
- status epilepticus
- life-threatening arrhythmia
- polytrauma
- non-manageable symptoms of a mental illness, self-endangerment, danger to others
- imminent birth
- serious traffic accident or traffic accident with children involved
- fall from a great height (\>3m)
- gunshot or knife wounds to the head, neck or torso
- fire with personal damage
- high-voltage accident
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital RWTH Aachen
Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 52074, Germany
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Rolf Rossaint, Prof. Dr.
University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Germany, Anaesthesiology Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, Master of Science, Scientific Staff
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 11, 2022
First Posted
May 24, 2022
Study Start
July 1, 2022
Primary Completion
July 3, 2022
Study Completion
June 6, 2023
Last Updated
September 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share