Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Treatment of Primary Progressive Aphasia
Phase II Clinical Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Treatment of Primary Progressive Aphasia
2 other identifiers
interventional
180
2 countries
3
Brief Summary
While many have strongly suggested that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may represent a beneficial intervention for patients with primary progressive aphasia (PPA), this promising technology has not yet been applied widely in clinical settings. This treatment gap is underscored by the absence of any neurally-focused standard-of-care treatments to mitigate the devastating impact of aphasia on patients' family, work, and social lives. Given that tDCS is inexpensive, easy to use (it is potentially amenable to home use by patients and caregivers), minimally invasive, and safe there is great promise to advance this intervention toward clinical use. The principal reason that tDCS has not found wide clinical application yet is that its efficacy has not been tested in large, multi-center, clinical trials. In this study, scientists in the three sites that have conducted tDCS clinical trials in North America-Johns Hopkins University and the University of Pennsylvania in the US, and the University of Toronto in Canada, will collaborate to conduct a multi-site, Phase II clinical trial of tDCS a population in dire need of better treatments.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Feb 2024
Typical duration for phase_2
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 13, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 23, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 13, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2028
May 5, 2026
April 1, 2026
4 years
May 13, 2022
April 30, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Immediate Change in Phonemic Accuracy
The primary outcome measure will be tDCS-induced change in performance on phonemic accuracy of trained items. Phonemic accuracy will be calculated on a scale of 0-100% with a higher number reflecting higher accuracy. The change in performance from baseline will be compared between the tDCS condition and the sham condition.
Baseline and Immediate follow-up of 3-week intervention period
Immediate Change in Letter Accuracy
The primary outcome measure will be tDCS-induced change in performance on letter accuracy of trained items. Letter accuracy will be calculated on a scale of 0-100% with a higher number reflecting higher accuracy. The change in performance from baseline will be compared between the tDCS condition and the sham condition.
Baseline and Immediate follow-up of 3-week intervention period
Change in Phonemic Accuracy at 3-month follow-up visit
The primary outcome measure will be tDCS-induced change in performance on phonemic accuracy of trained items, 3 months following the discontinuation of intervention. Phonemic accuracy will be calculated on a scale of 0-100% with a higher number reflecting higher accuracy. The change in performance from baseline will be compared between the tDCS condition and the sham condition.
Baseline and 3 months post intervention
Change in Letter Accuracy at 3-month follow-up visit
The primary outcome measure will be tDCS-induced change in performance on letter accuracy of trained items, 3 months following the discontinuation of intervention. Letter accuracy will be calculated on a scale of 0-100% with a higher number reflecting higher accuracy. The change in performance from baseline will be compared between the tDCS condition and the sham condition.
Baseline and 3 months post intervention
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in Untrained Naming Items (phonemic accuracy)
Baseline and 3 months post intervention
Change in Untrained Naming Items (letter accuracy)
Baseline and 3 months post intervention
Change in functional connectivity of select brain regions (z-correlations)
Immediate follow-up of 3-week intervention period and 3-month follow-up
Other Outcomes (17)
Change in volumetric measurements of select brain regions
Immediate follow-up of 3-week intervention period and 3-month follow-up
Change in location of white matter tracts of select brain regions
Immediate follow-up of 3-week intervention period and 3-month follow-up
Change in anisotropy of white matter tracts of select brain regions
Immediate follow-up of 3-week intervention period and 3-month follow-up
- +14 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Active tDCS + Language Therapy first
EXPERIMENTALActive tDCS will be applied at the beginning of 45 minutes language therapy session and will last for 20 minutes.
Sham tDCS + Language Therapy first
SHAM COMPARATORSham tDCS will be applied at the beginning of 45 minutes language therapy session.
Interventions
Active tDCS stimulation will be delivered by a battery-driven constant current stimulator. The electrical current will be administered to a pre-specified region of the brain (inferior frontal gyrus). The stimulation will be delivered at an intensity of 2mA (estimated current density 0.04 milliamps (mA)/cm2; estimated total charge 0.048 Coulombs (C)/cm2) in a ramp-like fashion for a maximum of 20 minutes. Language therapy will be conducted in conjunction with stimulation and will target oral and written naming.
During sham stimulation, current will be administered in a ramp-line fashion but after the ramping the intensity will drop to 0 mA. Language therapy targeting oral and written naming will be administered during sham tDCS stimulation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Presence of aphasia attributable to non-fluent PPA or logopenic PPA
- High school education (or more)
- Between the ages of 50 and 90
- Must be able to understand the nature of the study and give informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Cognitive impairment of sufficient severity to preclude giving informed consent (Mini Mental State Examination \[MMSE\] less than 15)
- Any unrelated neurologic or physical condition that impairs communication ability
- History of unrelated neurological conditions, including but not limited to traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, or small vessel disease, that has resulted in a neurologic deficit
- Any additional neurological condition that would likely reduce the safety of study participation, including central nervous system (CNS) vasculitis, intracranial tumor, intracranial aneurysm, multiple sclerosis, or arteriovenous malformations
- A medically unstable cardiopulmonary or metabolic disorder
- Individuals with pacemakers or implantable cardiac defibrillators
- Terminal illness associated with survival of less than 12 months
- Major active psychiatric illness that may interfere with required study procedures or treatments, as determined by the enrolling physician
- Current abuse of alcohol or drugs, prescription or otherwise
- Participant in another drug, device, or biologics trial within 30 days prior to enrollment
- Nursing a child, pregnant, or intending to become pregnant during the study
- Left-handedness
- History of spontaneous or partial complex seizures or unexplained loss of consciousness within 6 months of enrollment
- Subjects with metallic objects in the face or head other than dental apparatus, such as braces, fillings, or implants
- Subjects with previous craniotomy or any breach in the skull
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Johns Hopkins Universitylead
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (3)
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care
Toronto, Ontario, M6A 2E1, Canada
Related Publications (9)
Tsapkini K, Frangakis C, Gomez Y, Davis C, Hillis AE. Augmentation of spelling therapy with transcranial direct current stimulation in primary progressive aphasia: Preliminary results and challenges. Aphasiology. 2014;28(8-9):1112-1130. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2014.930410.
PMID: 26097278BACKGROUNDRoncero C, Kniefel H, Service E, Thiel A, Probst S, Chertkow H. Inferior parietal transcranial direct current stimulation with training improves cognition in anomic Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2017 Mar 24;3(2):247-253. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2017.03.003. eCollection 2017 Jun.
PMID: 29067331BACKGROUNDMcConathey EM, White NC, Gervits F, Ash S, Coslett HB, Grossman M, Hamilton RH. Baseline Performance Predicts tDCS-Mediated Improvements in Language Symptoms in Primary Progressive Aphasia. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jun 30;11:347. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00347. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28713256BACKGROUNDGervits F, Ash S, Coslett HB, Rascovsky K, Grossman M, Hamilton R. Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of primary progressive aphasia: An open-label pilot study. Brain Lang. 2016 Nov;162:35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
PMID: 27522537BACKGROUNDRoncero C, Service E, De Caro M, Popov A, Thiel A, Probst S, Chertkow H. Maximizing the Treatment Benefit of tDCS in Neurodegenerative Anomia. Front Neurosci. 2019 Nov 22;13:1231. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01231. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31824242BACKGROUNDTsapkini K, Webster KT, Ficek BN, Desmond JE, Onyike CU, Rapp B, Frangakis CE, Hillis AE. Electrical brain stimulation in different variants of primary progressive aphasia: A randomized clinical trial. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018 Sep 5;4:461-472. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2018.08.002. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30258975BACKGROUNDBoyle M. Semantic feature analysis treatment for aphasic word retrieval impairments: what's in a name? Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):411-22. doi: 10.1310/tsr1706-411.
PMID: 21239365BACKGROUNDRapp B, Glucroft B. The benefits and protective effects of behavioural treatment for dysgraphia in a case of primary progressive aphasia. Aphasiology. 2009 Feb 1;23(2):236-265. doi: 10.1080/02687030801943054.
PMID: 21603153BACKGROUNDHoman RW. The 10-20 electrode system and cerebral location. American Journal of EEG Technology. 1988;28(4):269-279.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kyrana Tsapkini, PhD.
Johns Hopkins University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 13, 2022
First Posted
May 23, 2022
Study Start
February 13, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2028
Last Updated
May 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04