NCT05373524

Brief Summary

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is common in chronic hemodialysis patients (HDC) with a prevalence of 30% according to the DOPPS study. The combination of PAD and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 is a risk factor for major amputation (24.5%) with a mortality rate of 55% at 2 years. Ischemia occurring during PAD is the result of impaired microcirculation, with insufficient blood flow to maintain tissue perfusion and viability. It is responsible for painful skin wounds whose healing is poor, with a significant risk of infection. In patients with chronic renal failure, it is linked to both:

  • local phenomena (atherosclerosis, calcification)
  • changes in blood viscosity (elevated hematocrit and inflammatory proteins, especially fibrinogen)
  • a neovascularization defect (uremic toxins, in particular indoxyl sulphate). If revascularization is not possible, amputation remains the only possible treatment to relieve pain and limit the risk of infection. Rheopheresis is an apheresis technique that allows the depletion of high molecular weight serum proteins. This would reduce blood viscosity and red blood cell (RBC) aggregation, thereby improving microvascular perfusion, with the aim of reducing pain, improving healing and limiting the risk of amputation. Several studies have investigated the efficacy of rheopheresis in PAD in HDC, but the level of evidence remains low.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
18

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 18, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 13, 2022

Completed
19 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2022

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

May 13, 2022

Status Verified

May 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

January 18, 2022

Last Update Submit

May 10, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Blood viscosity measured by rotational rheometer

    To assess the effect of rheopheresis on blood viscosity of chronic hemodialysis patients with PAD

    Immediately before 1ST and immediately after 12th procedure , outcome measurement will be reported at the end of the study (approximately 3 years)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Blood viscosity measured by rotational rheometer

    up to 24 weeks

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Evaluate the effect of rheopheresis on plasma viscosity measured by falling ball viscometer

    Immediately before day 0 and 12-th procedure and immediately after 1st procedure

  • Evaluate the effect of rheopheresis on skin microvascular function (1st and 12th sessions pre and post session)

    Immediately before day0 and 1 years

  • Evaluate the effect of rheopheresis on coagulation

    Immediately before day 0 and 12-th procedure and immediately after 1st procedure

Study Arms (2)

the rheopheresis group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Rheopheresis is performed using an automated monitor in a double-filtration cascade. Plasma purify from of high molecular weight proteins through a secondary filter is then returned to the patient. This technique is performed in tandem with a hemodialysis monitor.

Biological: Biological analysis

the shamapheresis group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Shamapheresis is performed with the same automated monitor (Plasauto, HemaT company). Extracted plasma is not treated through the secondary filter (Rheofilter) and return to the patient. This technique is performed in tandem with a hemodialysis monitor.

Biological: Biological analysis

Interventions

Rheopheresis using plasma separation and plasma filtration, coupled to hemodialysis

the rheopheresis groupthe shamapheresis group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 years or more and included in the RHEOPAD protocol (2019-A01513-54)
  • ESRD treated by hemodialysis or hemodiafiltration
  • PAD-LTI with tissue loss and/or wounds (ulcers or gangrene) with at least one of the following criterion, subject to the feasibility of the measures: arterial pressure assessment at the ankle \<70 mmHg, or toe pressure 30 mm Hg, or transcutaneous oximetry measurements \< 40 mm Hg
  • Interventional or surgical revascularization either not technically possible or no necessary
  • Medical insurance
  • Signed informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • \- Uncontrolled infection despite well-conducted antibiotic therapy
  • Life expectancy \< 1 year
  • Severe cognitive or psychiatric disorders
  • Pregnant woman, parturient, nursing mother
  • Patients unable to give an informed consent or unwilling to participate in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Grenoble University Hospital

Grenoble, 38043, France

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Roustit M, Cracowski JL. Assessment of endothelial and neurovascular function in human skin microcirculation. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013 Jul;34(7):373-84. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jun 21.

    PMID: 23791036BACKGROUND
  • Meyer A, Fiessler C, Stavroulakis K, Torsello G, Bisdas T, Lang W; CRITISCH collaborators. Outcomes of dialysis patients with critical limb ischemia after revascularization compared with patients with normal renal function. J Vasc Surg. 2018 Sep;68(3):822-829.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.12.048. Epub 2018 Mar 26.

  • Lowry D, Saeed M, Narendran P, Tiwari A. The Difference Between the Healing and the Nonhealing Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Review of the Role of the Microcirculation. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Sep;11(5):914-923. doi: 10.1177/1932296816658054. Epub 2016 Jul 10.

  • Weiss N. A critical review on the use of lipid apheresis and rheopheresis for treatment of peripheral arterial disease and the diabetic foot syndrome. Semin Dial. 2012 Mar-Apr;25(2):220-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2011.01036.x. Epub 2011 Dec 16.

  • Ferrannini M, Vischini G, Staffolani E, Scaccia F, Miani N, Parravano MC, Louis MM, Splendiani G, Di Daniele N. Rheopheresis in vascular diseases. Int J Artif Organs. 2007 Oct;30(10):923-9. doi: 10.1177/039139880703001010.

  • Klingel R, Mumme C, Fassbender T, Himmelsbach F, Altes U, Lotz J, Pohlmann T, Beyer J, Kustner E. Rheopheresis in patients with ischemic diabetic foot syndrome: results of an open label prospective pilot trial. Ther Apher Dial. 2003 Aug;7(4):444-55. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-0968.2003.00082.x.

  • Kirschkamp T, Schmid-Schonbein H, Weinberger A, Smeets R. Effects of fibrinogen and alpha2-macroglobulin and their apheretic elimination on general blood rheology and rheological characteristics of red blood cell aggregates. Ther Apher Dial. 2008 Oct;12(5):360-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2008.00610.x.

  • Briers JD. Laser Doppler, speckle and related techniques for blood perfusion mapping and imaging. Physiol Meas. 2001 Nov;22(4):R35-66. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/22/4/201.

  • Roustit M, Millet C, Blaise S, Dufournet B, Cracowski JL. Excellent reproducibility of laser speckle contrast imaging to assess skin microvascular reactivity. Microvasc Res. 2010 Dec;80(3):505-11. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2010.05.012. Epub 2010 Jun 9.

  • Choi B, Ramirez-San-Juan JC, Lotfi J, Stuart Nelson J. Linear response range characterization and in vivo application of laser speckle imaging of blood flow dynamics. J Biomed Opt. 2006 Jul-Aug;11(4):041129. doi: 10.1117/1.2341196.

  • Stewart CJ, Frank R, Forrester KR, Tulip J, Lindsay R, Bray RC. A comparison of two laser-based methods for determination of burn scar perfusion: laser Doppler versus laser speckle imaging. Burns. 2005 Sep;31(6):744-52. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.04.004.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Biological Oxygen Demand Analysis

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Environmental MonitoringEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental PollutionPublic HealthEnvironment and Public HealthPublic Health Practice

Central Study Contacts

HAMZA MD NACIRI BENNANI

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The efficacy will be assessed by a vascular surgeon blinded to the study group during consultation
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Rheopheresis procedure/Shamapheresis procedure
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2022

First Posted

May 13, 2022

Study Start

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion

May 1, 2024

Study Completion

May 1, 2024

Last Updated

May 13, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations