Rheopheresis Mechanism in Hemodialysis Patients With PAD
VALLOIRE
Rheopheresis Mechanism of Action and Impacts on the Evolution of Peripheral Arterial Disease in Hemodialysis Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
18
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is common in chronic hemodialysis patients (HDC) with a prevalence of 30% according to the DOPPS study. The combination of PAD and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 is a risk factor for major amputation (24.5%) with a mortality rate of 55% at 2 years. Ischemia occurring during PAD is the result of impaired microcirculation, with insufficient blood flow to maintain tissue perfusion and viability. It is responsible for painful skin wounds whose healing is poor, with a significant risk of infection. In patients with chronic renal failure, it is linked to both:
- local phenomena (atherosclerosis, calcification)
- changes in blood viscosity (elevated hematocrit and inflammatory proteins, especially fibrinogen)
- a neovascularization defect (uremic toxins, in particular indoxyl sulphate). If revascularization is not possible, amputation remains the only possible treatment to relieve pain and limit the risk of infection. Rheopheresis is an apheresis technique that allows the depletion of high molecular weight serum proteins. This would reduce blood viscosity and red blood cell (RBC) aggregation, thereby improving microvascular perfusion, with the aim of reducing pain, improving healing and limiting the risk of amputation. Several studies have investigated the efficacy of rheopheresis in PAD in HDC, but the level of evidence remains low.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 18, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 13, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2024
CompletedMay 13, 2022
May 1, 2022
1.9 years
January 18, 2022
May 10, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Blood viscosity measured by rotational rheometer
To assess the effect of rheopheresis on blood viscosity of chronic hemodialysis patients with PAD
Immediately before 1ST and immediately after 12th procedure , outcome measurement will be reported at the end of the study (approximately 3 years)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Blood viscosity measured by rotational rheometer
up to 24 weeks
Other Outcomes (3)
Evaluate the effect of rheopheresis on plasma viscosity measured by falling ball viscometer
Immediately before day 0 and 12-th procedure and immediately after 1st procedure
Evaluate the effect of rheopheresis on skin microvascular function (1st and 12th sessions pre and post session)
Immediately before day0 and 1 years
Evaluate the effect of rheopheresis on coagulation
Immediately before day 0 and 12-th procedure and immediately after 1st procedure
Study Arms (2)
the rheopheresis group
ACTIVE COMPARATORRheopheresis is performed using an automated monitor in a double-filtration cascade. Plasma purify from of high molecular weight proteins through a secondary filter is then returned to the patient. This technique is performed in tandem with a hemodialysis monitor.
the shamapheresis group
PLACEBO COMPARATORShamapheresis is performed with the same automated monitor (Plasauto, HemaT company). Extracted plasma is not treated through the secondary filter (Rheofilter) and return to the patient. This technique is performed in tandem with a hemodialysis monitor.
Interventions
Rheopheresis using plasma separation and plasma filtration, coupled to hemodialysis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or more and included in the RHEOPAD protocol (2019-A01513-54)
- ESRD treated by hemodialysis or hemodiafiltration
- PAD-LTI with tissue loss and/or wounds (ulcers or gangrene) with at least one of the following criterion, subject to the feasibility of the measures: arterial pressure assessment at the ankle \<70 mmHg, or toe pressure 30 mm Hg, or transcutaneous oximetry measurements \< 40 mm Hg
- Interventional or surgical revascularization either not technically possible or no necessary
- Medical insurance
- Signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- \- Uncontrolled infection despite well-conducted antibiotic therapy
- Life expectancy \< 1 year
- Severe cognitive or psychiatric disorders
- Pregnant woman, parturient, nursing mother
- Patients unable to give an informed consent or unwilling to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital, Grenoblelead
- University Grenoble Alpscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Grenoble University Hospital
Grenoble, 38043, France
Related Publications (11)
Roustit M, Cracowski JL. Assessment of endothelial and neurovascular function in human skin microcirculation. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013 Jul;34(7):373-84. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
PMID: 23791036BACKGROUNDMeyer A, Fiessler C, Stavroulakis K, Torsello G, Bisdas T, Lang W; CRITISCH collaborators. Outcomes of dialysis patients with critical limb ischemia after revascularization compared with patients with normal renal function. J Vasc Surg. 2018 Sep;68(3):822-829.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.12.048. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
PMID: 29598891RESULTLowry D, Saeed M, Narendran P, Tiwari A. The Difference Between the Healing and the Nonhealing Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Review of the Role of the Microcirculation. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Sep;11(5):914-923. doi: 10.1177/1932296816658054. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
PMID: 27390224RESULTWeiss N. A critical review on the use of lipid apheresis and rheopheresis for treatment of peripheral arterial disease and the diabetic foot syndrome. Semin Dial. 2012 Mar-Apr;25(2):220-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2011.01036.x. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
PMID: 22175277RESULTFerrannini M, Vischini G, Staffolani E, Scaccia F, Miani N, Parravano MC, Louis MM, Splendiani G, Di Daniele N. Rheopheresis in vascular diseases. Int J Artif Organs. 2007 Oct;30(10):923-9. doi: 10.1177/039139880703001010.
PMID: 17992654RESULTKlingel R, Mumme C, Fassbender T, Himmelsbach F, Altes U, Lotz J, Pohlmann T, Beyer J, Kustner E. Rheopheresis in patients with ischemic diabetic foot syndrome: results of an open label prospective pilot trial. Ther Apher Dial. 2003 Aug;7(4):444-55. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-0968.2003.00082.x.
PMID: 12887730RESULTKirschkamp T, Schmid-Schonbein H, Weinberger A, Smeets R. Effects of fibrinogen and alpha2-macroglobulin and their apheretic elimination on general blood rheology and rheological characteristics of red blood cell aggregates. Ther Apher Dial. 2008 Oct;12(5):360-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2008.00610.x.
PMID: 18937718RESULTBriers JD. Laser Doppler, speckle and related techniques for blood perfusion mapping and imaging. Physiol Meas. 2001 Nov;22(4):R35-66. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/22/4/201.
PMID: 11761081RESULTRoustit M, Millet C, Blaise S, Dufournet B, Cracowski JL. Excellent reproducibility of laser speckle contrast imaging to assess skin microvascular reactivity. Microvasc Res. 2010 Dec;80(3):505-11. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2010.05.012. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
PMID: 20542492RESULTChoi B, Ramirez-San-Juan JC, Lotfi J, Stuart Nelson J. Linear response range characterization and in vivo application of laser speckle imaging of blood flow dynamics. J Biomed Opt. 2006 Jul-Aug;11(4):041129. doi: 10.1117/1.2341196.
PMID: 16965157RESULTStewart CJ, Frank R, Forrester KR, Tulip J, Lindsay R, Bray RC. A comparison of two laser-based methods for determination of burn scar perfusion: laser Doppler versus laser speckle imaging. Burns. 2005 Sep;31(6):744-52. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.04.004.
PMID: 16129229RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The efficacy will be assessed by a vascular surgeon blinded to the study group during consultation
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 18, 2022
First Posted
May 13, 2022
Study Start
June 1, 2022
Primary Completion
May 1, 2024
Study Completion
May 1, 2024
Last Updated
May 13, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share