NCT05368701

Brief Summary

The aim of the present research is to explore whether a brief, smartphone app-based intervention based on psychological theory can help adolescents to avoid self-harming. The smartphone app will be piloted in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with adolescents. 90 adolescents will be recruited and assigned to one of three conditions: (a) intervention group who will complete the smartphone-based VHS app for self-harm (n = 30), (b) control group (n = 30) who will complete paper-and-pencil modified VHS, without the app, and (c) control group who will complete measures via the app but not the VHS (n = 30).

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 5, 2022

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 10, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2022

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

May 10, 2022

Status Verified

May 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

May 5, 2022

Last Update Submit

May 5, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

self-harmsuicidal ideationsuicide attemptsmartphone appvolitional help sheetimplementation intentionsif-then plans

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Non-suicidal self-harm

    'Have you ever deliberately harmed yourself in any way but not with the intention of killing yourself? (i.e., self-harm)' (British Psychiatric Morbidity Survey) Response option is 'Yes' or 'No'. If respondents answer yes, timing of last episode and frequency will be asked.

    6 months

  • Suicidal ideation

    'Have you ever seriously thought of taking your life, but not actually attempted to do so?' (British Psychiatric Morbidity Survey) Response option is 'Yes' or 'No'. If respondents answer yes, timing of last episode and frequency will be asked.

    6 months

  • Suicide attempt

    'Have you ever made an attempt to take your life, by taking an overdose of tablets or in some other way?' (British Psychiatric Morbidity Survey) Response option is 'Yes' or 'No'. If respondents answer yes, timing of last episode and frequency will be asked.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Exposure to suicide and mental imagery about death

    6 months

  • Capability, opportunity and motivation (based on Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour model)

    6 months

  • Habit

    6 months

  • State self-regulation

    6 months

  • Frequencies with which critical situations were encountered and appropriate responses were used

    6 months

Study Arms (3)

App-based volitional help sheet (VHS) for self-harm

EXPERIMENTAL

A smartphone-based app version of the adapted VHS for self-harm. Participants read a brief statement designed to encourage them to avoid self-harming ("We want you to plan to avoid self-harming"). Participants are presented with ten 'high risk' situations (temptations). By selecting an appropriate situation, 10 appropriate responses (processes of change) are suggested (see Armitage, 2008). Participants are told that identifying situations in which they were tempted to self-harm and identifying ways to overcome those temptations had been shown to help people change their behaviour. Participants in this condition are asked to form implementation intentions by linking critical situations with appropriate responses by choosing an appropriate response from a drop down menu for each critical situation.

Behavioral: Volitional Help Sheet for self-harm

App-based pencil-and-paper VHS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The app will deliver a .pdf file (for printing) worksheet of the VHS for self-harm, with no integration into the app. Participants read a brief statement designed to encourage them to avoid self-harming ("We want you to plan to avoid self-harming"). Participants are presented with a table with two columns and ten rows. Ten 'high risk' situations (temptations) are presented in the left hand column and 10 appropriate responses (processes of change) are presented in the right hand column (see Armitage, 2008). Participants are told that identifying situations in which they were tempted to self-harm and identifying ways to overcome those temptations had been shown to help people change their behaviour. Participants in this condition are asked to form implementation intentions by linking critical situations with appropriate responses by choosing an appropriate response by drawing a line between the situation and response.

Behavioral: Volitional Help Sheet for self-harm

App with no VHS component

NO INTERVENTION

An app with no VHS component that collects questionnaire survey data. In this control condition, the app only contains the survey questions and links to helplines contained in the other two conditions. A free text entry box will ask participants to think of important situations where they might self-harm. A second box asks participants to think of alternative plans that they can do instead of self-harming. Participants are not guided to make links between the situations and responses.

Interventions

The "volitional help sheet" (VHS) is a brief psychosocial intervention that significantly reduces thoughts and acts of self-harm in adults admitted to hospital following an initial episode of self-harm. It is based on IF-THEN statements that help people link critical situations to alternative appropriate responses. An example is: "If I feel the urge to self-harm when I want to get relief from a terrible state of mind, then I will do something else instead of self-harming". IF-THEN statements are intended to act as automatic coping responses, especially in cases where people may feel the urge to self-harm. The VHS has previously been successful in reducing self-harm in people recently admitted to hospital for self-harm. Recent data have also demonstrated that a web-based version of the VHS was acceptable among a large representative sample of UK adults with self-harm experiences. However, it is yet to be known whether this intervention is effective and acceptable among adolescents.

Also known as: If-Then Plans
App-based pencil-and-paper VHSApp-based volitional help sheet (VHS) for self-harm

Eligibility Criteria

Age12 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Adolescents aged between 12-18, who have been admitted to acute mental health in the past year or diagnosed with functional mental health problems

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals who cannot give informed consent, or whose parent/guardian cannot give informed consent.
  • Individuals under the age of 12 years

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (14)

  • Alexander S, Pillay R, Smith B. A systematic review of the experiences of vulnerable people participating in research on sensitive topics. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Dec;88:85-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Sep 3.

    PMID: 30219697BACKGROUND
  • Armitage CJ. A volitional help sheet to encourage smoking cessation: a randomized exploratory trial. Health Psychol. 2008 Sep;27(5):557-66. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.5.557.

    PMID: 18823182BACKGROUND
  • Armitage CJ, Rahim WA, Rowe R, O'Connor RC. An exploratory randomised trial of a simple, brief psychological intervention to reduce subsequent suicidal ideation and behaviour in patients admitted to hospital for self-harm. Br J Psychiatry. 2016 May;208(5):470-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.162495. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

    PMID: 26743808BACKGROUND
  • Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Carragher N, Sunderland M. Prevalence and predictors of distress associated with completion of an online survey assessing mental health and suicidality in the community. Psychiatry Res. 2018 Apr;262:348-350. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.048. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

    PMID: 28843625BACKGROUND
  • Biddle L, Cooper J, Owen-Smith A, Klineberg E, Bennewith O, Hawton K, Kapur N, Donovan J, Gunnell D. Qualitative interviewing with vulnerable populations: individuals' experiences of participating in suicide and self-harm based research. J Affect Disord. 2013 Mar 5;145(3):356-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.08.024. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

    PMID: 23021191BACKGROUND
  • Blades CA, Stritzke WGK, Page AC, Brown JD. The benefits and risks of asking research participants about suicide: A meta-analysis of the impact of exposure to suicide-related content. Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Aug;64:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 5.

    PMID: 30014862BACKGROUND
  • Dazzi T, Gribble R, Wessely S, Fear NT. Does asking about suicide and related behaviours induce suicidal ideation? What is the evidence? Psychol Med. 2014 Dec;44(16):3361-3. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714001299. Epub 2014 Jul 7.

    PMID: 24998511BACKGROUND
  • Keyworth C, Epton T, Goldthorpe J, Calam R, Armitage CJ. Acceptability, reliability, and validity of a brief measure of capabilities, opportunities, and motivations ("COM-B"). Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Sep;25(3):474-501. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12417. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

    PMID: 32314500BACKGROUND
  • Keyworth C, O'Connor R, Quinlivan L, Armitage CJ. Acceptability of a Brief Web-Based Theory-Based Intervention to Prevent and Reduce Self-harm: Mixed Methods Evaluation. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 14;23(9):e28349. doi: 10.2196/28349.

    PMID: 34518153BACKGROUND
  • McManus S, Gunnell D, Cooper C, Bebbington PE, Howard LM, Brugha T, Jenkins R, Hassiotis A, Weich S, Appleby L. Prevalence of non-suicidal self-harm and service contact in England, 2000-14: repeated cross-sectional surveys of the general population. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;6(7):573-581. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30188-9. Epub 2019 Jun 4.

    PMID: 31175059BACKGROUND
  • O'Connor RC, Ferguson E, Scott F, Smyth R, McDaid D, Park AL, Beautrais A, Armitage CJ. A brief psychological intervention to reduce repetition of self-harm in patients admitted to hospital following a suicide attempt: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;4(6):451-460. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30129-3. Epub 2017 Apr 20.

    PMID: 28434871BACKGROUND
  • Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8.

    PMID: 28126032BACKGROUND
  • Cukrowicz K, Smith P, Poindexter E. The effect of participating in suicide research: does participating in a research protocol on suicide and psychiatric symptoms increase suicide ideation and attempts? Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2010 Dec;40(6):535-43. doi: 10.1521/suli.2010.40.6.535.

    PMID: 21198322BACKGROUND
  • Witt KG, Hetrick SE, Rajaram G, Hazell P, Taylor Salisbury TL, Townsend E, Hawton K. Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 7;3(3):CD013667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013667.pub2.

    PMID: 33677832BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Self-Injurious BehaviorSuicidal IdeationSuicide, Attempted

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehaviorSuicide

Study Officials

  • Christopher J Armitage

    University of Manchester

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The allocation sequence will be concealed from the researcher by using a centralised service (e.g., trial coordination centre) to ensure that selection remains unbiased. Thus, the trial will be double-blind.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be randomly allocated to one of three conditions. Patients will be randomised to the control group or the interventions in a 1:1:1 using a computer-generated random allocation sequence with block sizes of 3, 6, and 9.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Associate

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2022

First Posted

May 10, 2022

Study Start

July 1, 2022

Primary Completion

March 1, 2023

Study Completion

March 1, 2023

Last Updated

May 10, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share