CHOICES-TEEN Randomized Controlled Trial
CHOICES-TEEN: Efficacy of a Bundled Risk Reduction Intervention for Juvenile Justice Females
1 other identifier
interventional
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial will: 1) Test the efficacy of the CHOICES-TEEN (CT) intervention compared with an Attentional Control (AC) condition on reducing the risk of substance-exposed pregnancy (SEP) and HIV/STI among high-risk female youth involved with the juvenile justice system by reducing alcohol use, increasing marijuana cessation, reducing risk of pregnancy, and increasing condom use; 2) Test the efficacy of CT, compared to AC, on increasing cognitive self-regulation abilities; 3) Test proposed intervention mediators/mechanisms of action for CT overall and by race/ethnicity; and 4) Test the moderating effect of initial readiness to change on risk of SEP and risk of HIV/STI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 8, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 6, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 10, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 10, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 10, 2026
CompletedJune 19, 2025
June 1, 2025
4 years
May 6, 2022
June 16, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in risk of alcohol-exposed pregnancy (AEP) as measured by self-reported daily standard drinks, vaginal sex, and use of contraception on the Timeline Followback calendar.
Risk of AEP is defined as any risk drinking (\>3 drinks/day or \>7 drinks/week on average) and any occurrence of vaginal sex with no use or ineffective use of contraception in the assessment period. Self-reported daily alcohol use (in standard drinks), vaginal intercourse, and contraception (effective use) data from the Timeline Followback will be used to calculate risk of AEP for the previous 90 days. Change in Risk of AEP will be examined at 3-, 6-, and 9-months post-intake. A participant will be considered at risk of AEP at each of the 3-, 6-, and 9 month timepoints if the participant had any occurrence of vaginal sex without the use of effective contraception and had more than 3 standard drinks on any day or more than 7 standard drinks per week on average in any 30 day period in the previous 90 days. Risk of AEP will be a dichotomous outcome (at risk of AEP or at reduced risk of AEP).
3, 6 and 9 months
Change in risk of marijuana-exposed pregnancy (MEP) as measured by self-reported marijuana use, vaginal sex, and use of contraception on the Timeline Followback calendar.
Risk of MEP is defined as any day with marijuana use and any occurrence of vaginal sex with no use or ineffective use of contraception in the assessment period. Self-reported data from the Timeline Followback will be used to calculate risk of MEP for the previous 90 days at 3-, 6- , and 9 months post-intake. A participant will be considered at risk of MEP at each of the 3-, 6-, and 9 month timepoints if the participant had any occurrence of vaginal sex without the use of effective contraception and had any day with marijuana use in any 30 day period in the previous 90 days. Risk of MEP will be a dichotomous outcome (at risk of MEP or at reduced risk of MEP).
3, 6, and 9 months
Change in risk of HIV and STI
Risk of HIV and STI is defined as any day with an occurrence of vaginal or anal sex without using a condom in the assessment period. Self-reported data from the Timeline Followback will be used to calculate risk HIV/STI risk for the previous 90 days at 3-, 6-, and 9 months post-intake. A participant will be considered at risk of HIV/STI at each of the 3-, 6- or 9 month timepoints if the participant had any occurrence of vaginal or anal sex without the use of a condom in any 30 day period in the previous 90 days. Risk of HIV/STI will be a dichotomous outcome (at risk of HIV/STI or not at risk of HIV/STI).
3, 6, and 9 months
Study Arms (2)
CHOICES-TEEN
EXPERIMENTALThis is a four session session utilizing Motivational Interviewing (MI) and cognitive-behavioral approaches to enhance motivation for change in one or more primary behaviors: alcohol, marijuana, and condom/contraceptive use. The intervention is delivered by a trained master's level counselor and an Adolescent Medicine Specialist using one in-person session, and three Telehealth sessions.
Health and Life Skills Education
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis four session life skills education program provides detailed information on time management, sleep, nutrition and exercise, and financial management. This program is delivered in person for the first session and then by Telehealth platform.
Interventions
This is a four-session hybrid in-person and Telehealth counseling intervention that is designed to reduce the risk of HIV/STI and alcohol- and marijuana-exposed pregnancy for young women who are involved in the juvenile justice system between the ages of 14-19.
This is a four-session psychoeducational intervention that is designed to provide information on time management, sleep, nutrition and exercise, and financial management.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female adolescents between 14-19 years of age, of any race, who are at risk of substance-exposed pregnancy and HIV/STI will be eligible. Specifically, they must report the following behaviors within the last 3 months:
- sexual intercourse with a male
- inconsistent/ineffective condom use AND
- inconsistent/ineffective contraception use
You may not qualify if:
- severe cognitive and/or psychiatric impairment that precludes cooperation with study protocol, per judgement of the interventionist or research staff
- do not speak or read/write in English
- unable to meet study requirements, including follow-up assessments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Texas at Austinlead
- Wayne State Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Baylor University
Houston, Texas, 77002, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Danielle E Parrish, Ph.D.
Baylor University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kirk L von Sternberg, Ph.D.
University of Texas at Austin
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Unique client ID numbers will be assigned to each program e.g. 2000 series, 3000 series, etc. Using RedCAP, each program's ID numbers will be randomly assigned to an intervention condition in advance. The condition assigned to each client ID number will be placed into an opaque envelope and these envelopes will be included in the intake packets for each new participant. The envelope with the condition assignment will be opened by the assessor after the conclusion of the assessment. Therefore, assessor, CHOICES-TEEN interventionist and study staff delivering the attention control condition will all be blind to condition during the intake assessment. Follow-up assessments will be done by study staff who are not providing the intervention.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 6, 2022
First Posted
May 10, 2022
Study Start
April 8, 2022
Primary Completion
April 10, 2026
Study Completion
April 10, 2026
Last Updated
June 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share