NCT05365906

Brief Summary

This study is set up by an international core group consisting of infectious disease specialists, geriatricians, urologists, microbiologists, emergency physicians and primary care physicians to develop a consensus-based research definition of urinary tract infections. The absence of such a reference standard leads to misclassification bias and heterogeneity between studies making progress in the field of UTI difficult, for example with much needed near patient diagnostic tests.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
47

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2022

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 12, 2022

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 28, 2022

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 9, 2022

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 23, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 23, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

March 8, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

April 28, 2022

Last Update Submit

March 7, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Consensus

    The primary study endpoint is the degree of consensus among the expert panel regarding the ORACLE reference standard. In round 1, consensus is defined as follows: An item is deemed indicative of UTI in case of a panel median of 7-9, without disagreement; uncertain in case of a panel median of 4-6 OR any median with disagreement; and not indicative of UTI in case of a panel median of 1-3, without disagreement. Disagreement exists when more than a third of responses are in the upper and the lower tertiles for the item in question In round 2, consensus is not predefined (i.e. with a minimum percentage). Instead, the level of agreement with a preliminary reference standard will be assessed by a dichotomous yes/no question and experts will have the possibility to give feedback on the reference standard. Thereafter, the adjusted reference standard will be presented and the level of agreement (and relative improvement) will be assessed by a dichotomous yes/no question again.

    Through study completion, an average of 7 months

Interventions

This study will use a modified Delphi approach, consisting of a set of iterative questionnaires. In round 1, an expert panel will grade the relevance of UTI-related items, after which a smaller core research team will compose a reference standard in a series of (online) meetings. In round 2, clinical vignettes will be used to party validate the reference standard and expert panel agreement with the new reference standard will be assessed.

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

National and international experts will be invited by email to participate in the Delphi process. Since a heterogeneous expert panel is an important feature of Delphi studies, all relevant specialties will be represented in the panel, including infectious diseases, urology, geriatric medicine, acute/emergency medicine, intensive care medicine, microbiology, and primary care. To avoid selection bias when composing the expert panel and to create a sufficiently large panel, experts will be recruited through various platforms. Experts will be allowed to invite other experts, so called 'snowballing'.

You may qualify if:

  • Medical specialist working in the following fields: infectious diseases, urology, geriatric medicine, acute/emergency medicine, intensive care medicine, microbiology, and primary care
  • Clinical and/or research experience with urinary tract infections

You may not qualify if:

  • Residency not completed yet
  • Working in a different field than described above

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Leiden University Medical Center

Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA, Netherlands

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Tract Infections

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

InfectionsUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Manu Bilsen, MD

    Leiden University Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PhD student, Department of Infectious Diseases, Principle Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2022

First Posted

May 9, 2022

Study Start

April 12, 2022

Primary Completion

February 23, 2023

Study Completion

February 23, 2023

Last Updated

March 8, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Locations