UTI Reference Standard: Delphi Method
ORACLE
Development of a Research Reference Standard for Urinary Tract Infection Using a Modified Delphi Technique
1 other identifier
observational
47
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is set up by an international core group consisting of infectious disease specialists, geriatricians, urologists, microbiologists, emergency physicians and primary care physicians to develop a consensus-based research definition of urinary tract infections. The absence of such a reference standard leads to misclassification bias and heterogeneity between studies making progress in the field of UTI difficult, for example with much needed near patient diagnostic tests.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Apr 2022
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 12, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 28, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 9, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 23, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 23, 2023
CompletedMarch 8, 2023
March 1, 2023
11 months
April 28, 2022
March 7, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Consensus
The primary study endpoint is the degree of consensus among the expert panel regarding the ORACLE reference standard. In round 1, consensus is defined as follows: An item is deemed indicative of UTI in case of a panel median of 7-9, without disagreement; uncertain in case of a panel median of 4-6 OR any median with disagreement; and not indicative of UTI in case of a panel median of 1-3, without disagreement. Disagreement exists when more than a third of responses are in the upper and the lower tertiles for the item in question In round 2, consensus is not predefined (i.e. with a minimum percentage). Instead, the level of agreement with a preliminary reference standard will be assessed by a dichotomous yes/no question and experts will have the possibility to give feedback on the reference standard. Thereafter, the adjusted reference standard will be presented and the level of agreement (and relative improvement) will be assessed by a dichotomous yes/no question again.
Through study completion, an average of 7 months
Interventions
This study will use a modified Delphi approach, consisting of a set of iterative questionnaires. In round 1, an expert panel will grade the relevance of UTI-related items, after which a smaller core research team will compose a reference standard in a series of (online) meetings. In round 2, clinical vignettes will be used to party validate the reference standard and expert panel agreement with the new reference standard will be assessed.
Eligibility Criteria
National and international experts will be invited by email to participate in the Delphi process. Since a heterogeneous expert panel is an important feature of Delphi studies, all relevant specialties will be represented in the panel, including infectious diseases, urology, geriatric medicine, acute/emergency medicine, intensive care medicine, microbiology, and primary care. To avoid selection bias when composing the expert panel and to create a sufficiently large panel, experts will be recruited through various platforms. Experts will be allowed to invite other experts, so called 'snowballing'.
You may qualify if:
- Medical specialist working in the following fields: infectious diseases, urology, geriatric medicine, acute/emergency medicine, intensive care medicine, microbiology, and primary care
- Clinical and/or research experience with urinary tract infections
You may not qualify if:
- Residency not completed yet
- Working in a different field than described above
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Manu Bilsen, MD
Leiden University Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD student, Department of Infectious Diseases, Principle Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 28, 2022
First Posted
May 9, 2022
Study Start
April 12, 2022
Primary Completion
February 23, 2023
Study Completion
February 23, 2023
Last Updated
March 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03