Scotchbond Universal Plus Compared to Scotchbond Universal With Filtek Universal Restorative to Restore Class V NCCLs
SBU+ClassV
Clinical Performance of a New Dental Adhesive, 3M™ Scotchbond™ Universal Plus Adhesive, Compared to 3M™ Scotchbond™ Universal Adhesive When Used With 3M™ Filtek™ Universal Restorative to Restore Class V Non-carious Cervical Lesions
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, controlled, within-subject, randomized, single-center study comparing Scotchbond Universal Plus (SBU+) and Scotchbond Universal (SBU) adhesives when used with Filtek restorative. The study will enroll Subjects scheduled to undergo Class-V non-carious cervical lesion (NCCL) restorations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 5, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 18, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 7, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 11, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 24, 2026
CompletedApril 24, 2026
April 1, 2026
2.6 years
April 30, 2022
March 3, 2026
April 22, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Retention of Restorative Material
The percentage of restorations with partial or complete loss of the restorative materials.
24 months post-restoration
Marginal Adaptation
Marginal adaptation of restorations graded on a scale of 1-5 with a score of 1 being Excellent/very good and a score of 5 being Poor. Grading scale is based on modified FDI (Fédération Dentaire Internationale) World Dental Federation criteria. Scoring categories for marginal adaptation: 1. Excellent/very good: No clinically detectable gap. 2. Good: Marginal integrity deviates from the ideal but could be upgraded to ideal by polishing. 3. Sufficient/Satisfactory: Leakage/discoloration is present but limited to the marginal area. 4. Unsatisfactory: Localized gap larger than 250 µm, may result in exposure of dentine or base. 5. Poor: Generalized gap larger than 250 µm or the restoration is loose but in situ, re-placement necessary.
24 months post-restoration
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Retention of Restorative Material
6 months post-restoration
Marginal Adaptation
6 months post restoration
Fracture of Restorative Material
6 months post-restoration
Secondary Caries
6 months post-restoration
Retention of Restorative Material
12 months post-restoration
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
SBU+ Treatment Group
EXPERIMENTALIn a split-mouth design, either 1 tooth (for Subjects with 2 eligible teeth) or 2 teeth (for Subjects with 4 eligible teeth) with Class-V NCCLs underwent restoration(s) using Scotchbond Universal Plus (SBU+) Adhesive .
SBU Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn a split-mouth design, either 1 tooth (for Subjects with 2 eligible teeth) or 2 teeth (for Subjects with 4 eligible teeth) with Class-V NCCLs underwent restoration(s) using the predicate device, Scotchbond Universal (SBU) Adhesive.
Interventions
Eligible teeth with Class-V NCCLs randomized to the SBU Control group underwent restoration(s) using Scotchbond Universal Plus (SBU) Adhesive using total-etch mode and Filtek Universal Restorative material.
Eligible teeth with Class-V NCCLs randomized to the SBU+ treatment group underwent restoration(s) using Scotchbond Universal Plus (SBU+) Adhesive using total-etch mode and Filtek Universal Restorative material.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects may be included that meet the following criteria:
- Subject is at least 18 years of age at the time of consent
- Subject is able to provide their own informed consent
- Subject has a minimum of two teeth that:
- have non-carious Class V lesions that are at least 1.5 mm deep
- are not devitalized
- have not undergone root canal treatment
- Subject has an Approximal Plaque Index score ≤ 40% as assessed via explorer and without the use of plaque-disclosing agents
- Subject is able and willing to return for all scheduled study visits
- Subject meets the Level-I or Level-II classification criteria of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System For Dental Patient Care
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects may not be included that meet any of the following criteria:
- Subject has any of the following:
- rampant caries
- chronic periodontitis
- salivary gland dysfunction
- Subject is unable, for any reason, to tolerate the procedure time required to place the restorations
- Subject has unacceptable oral hygiene (eg, chronic moderate to heavy plaque accumulation along the gumline)
- Subject has known sensitivity to the study product components (ie, acrylate)
- Subject is planned to be enrolled in another investigational trial that requires additional interventions at any time during the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Solventum US LLClead
Study Sites (1)
Louisiana State University HSC-Health, School of Dentistry
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70119, United States
Related Publications (3)
Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Aug;14(4):349-66. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0432-8. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
PMID: 20628774BACKGROUNDBurgess JO, Sadid-Zadeh R, Cakir D, Ramp LC. Clinical evaluation of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems in noncarious cervical lesions: a two-year report. Oper Dent. 2013 Sep-Oct;38(5):477-87. doi: 10.2341/12-355-CR. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
PMID: 23327229BACKGROUNDLawson NC, Robles A, Fu CC, Lin CP, Sawlani K, Burgess JO. Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent. 2015 Oct;43(10):1229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
PMID: 26231300BACKGROUND
Limitations and Caveats
There was a larger than expected amount of attrition during this study, resulting in fewer teeth assessed at the primary 2-year data than anticipated. With higher attrition, the precision of the estimates of the primary results is less than anticipated with slightly wider 95% confidence intervals. Additionally, there is a chance of attrition bias, where the characteristics of the participants who leave the study differ from those who remain.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Paula Myhre
- Organization
- Solventum US LLC
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alika Yu, DDS
Louisiana State University HSC Health, School of Dentistry
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- All assessments were performed by two dental examiners that were independent of the dentist that placed the restorations and were blinded to the treatment arms.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 30, 2022
First Posted
May 5, 2022
Study Start
August 18, 2022
Primary Completion
April 7, 2025
Study Completion
September 11, 2025
Last Updated
April 24, 2026
Results First Posted
April 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share