Regional Nasal Block and Dexmedetomidine in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
Comparison Between Combined Regional Nasal Block and General Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia With Dexmedetomidine During Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose is to compare the efficacy of combined regional nasal block and general anesthesia versus general anesthesia with dexmedetomidine during endoscopic sinus surgery in optimizing intraoperative surgical field.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 3, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 5, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 5, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 5, 2022
CompletedSeptember 2, 2022
August 1, 2022
9 months
February 5, 2022
August 31, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Optimizing intraoperative surgical field
Comparison between efficacy of the two techniques in optimizing intraoperative surgical field which will be measured using the average category scale(where grade 0 is defined as no bleeding and grade 5 is defined as severe bleeding, constant suctioning required).
Up to 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Heart rate in beat per minute
Up to 8 months
Blood loss in millilitres
Up to 8 months
endtidal sevoflurane concentration in MAC%
Up to 8 months
phentolamine requirements in milligrams
Up to 8 months
Duration of anesthesia in minutes
Up to 8 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
regional nasal block
ACTIVE COMPARATORsphenopalatine ganglion block with general anesthesia
dexmedetomidine
ACTIVE COMPARATORuse the drug with general anesthesia
Interventions
using nasal block including sphenopalatine ganglion block with general anesthesia to optimize surgical field
using dexmedetomidine with induction of general anesthesia to optimize surgical field
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients of ASA I or ASA II physical status.
- Patients with age 18-65 years.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with physical status ASA III, IV.
- Known allergic reactions to local anesthetics.
- Patients with history for cerebrovascular or coronary insufficiency.
- Patients with infection at the block site.
- Patients with coagulopathy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Moustafa Rakha
Cairo, 0200, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Nahed Effat Yossef Salama, Professor
Ain Shams University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2022
First Posted
May 5, 2022
Study Start
February 3, 2022
Primary Completion
November 5, 2022
Study Completion
December 5, 2022
Last Updated
September 2, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- 1 year
- Access Criteria
- all collected IPD
comparison between the two techniques in optimizing surgical field