Stroke Volume Variation-guided Fluid Infusion in Major Liver Tumour Resection
Restrictive Versus Liberal Stroke Volume Variation-guided Fluid Infusion in Major Liver Tumour Resection: a Prospective Randomised Trial of Perioperative Quality of Care
1 other identifier
interventional
118
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Studies have demonstrated that the rate of change in stroke volume variation (SVV) can be used to determine the volume of body fluids during major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesiologists can use SVV as a guide for the appropriate administration of intraoperative fluids to improve postoperative prognoses. Liver surgery is a major abdominal operation, and the amount of blood lost is typically higher than that during other general abdominal surgeries. Blood loss is positively correlated with the intraoperative fluid infusion volume, and greater blood loss is associated with more postoperative complications. Additionally, comorbid liver disease or cirrhosis can increase the complexity of liver tumour resection, causing difficulty in assessing intravascular volume and determining the appropriate intraoperative infusion volume.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 29, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 4, 2022
CompletedJuly 1, 2022
June 1, 2022
1.9 years
April 29, 2022
June 28, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The incidence of postoperative complications in the two groups.
calculate the incidence of postoperative complication within 30 days
From day 1 to day 30 after surgery.
Secondary Outcomes (8)
The differences of perioperative ALT
Examination report on the 1st postoperative day.
The differences of perioperative eGFR
Examination report on the 1st postoperative day.
The differences of perioperative creatinine
Examination report on the 1st postoperative day.
The differences of perioperative T.bil
Examination report on the 1st postoperative day.
The differences of perioperative Hb
Examination report on the 1st postoperative day.
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
the low-SVV group
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe value of stroke volume variation will be less than or equal to 10 this group
the high-SVV group
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe value of stroke volume variation will be higher than 10 this group
Interventions
fluid will be guided by value of stroke volume variation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- We initially selected 118 patients who required hepatectomy.
- The physiological status of the patients was assessed in terms of American Society of Anesthesiologists scores I-III
You may not qualify if:
- Extreme body mass index (BMI)
- Age under 20 or over 75 years
- Emergency surgery
- Preexisting cardiac, hepatic, renal, or coagulation disorder; hyperthyroidism; and sinus arrhythmia.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital
Kaohsiung City, 81362, Taiwan
Related Publications (26)
Lang K, Boldt J, Suttner S, Haisch G. Colloids versus crystalloids and tissue oxygen tension in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2001 Aug;93(2):405-9 , 3rd contents page. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200108000-00034.
PMID: 11473870BACKGROUNDMythen MG, Webb AR. The role of gut mucosal hypoperfusion in the pathogenesis of post-operative organ dysfunction. Intensive Care Med. 1994;20(3):203-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01704701. No abstract available.
PMID: 8014287BACKGROUNDSear JW. Kidney dysfunction in the postoperative period. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Jul;95(1):20-32. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei018. Epub 2004 Nov 5.
PMID: 15531622BACKGROUNDOsman D, Ridel C, Ray P, Monnet X, Anguel N, Richard C, Teboul JL. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):64-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000249851.94101.4F.
PMID: 17080001BACKGROUNDTavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, Dupont J, Scherpereel P. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology. 1998 Dec;89(6):1313-21. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199812000-00007.
PMID: 9856704BACKGROUNDGan TJ, Soppitt A, Maroof M, el-Moalem H, Robertson KM, Moretti E, Dwane P, Glass PS. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology. 2002 Oct;97(4):820-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200210000-00012.
PMID: 12357146BACKGROUNDSu NY, Huang CJ, Tsai P, Hsu YW, Hung YC, Cheng CR. Cardiac output measurement during cardiac surgery: esophageal Doppler versus pulmonary artery catheter. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 2002 Sep;40(3):127-33.
PMID: 12434609BACKGROUNDWakeling HG, McFall MR, Jenkins CS, Woods WG, Miles WF, Barclay GR, Fleming SC. Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Nov;95(5):634-42. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei223. Epub 2005 Sep 9.
PMID: 16155038BACKGROUNDLefrant JY, Bruelle P, Aya AG, Saissi G, Dauzat M, de La Coussaye JE, Eledjam JJ. Training is required to improve the reliability of esophageal Doppler to measure cardiac output in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 1998 Apr;24(4):347-52. doi: 10.1007/s001340050578.
PMID: 9609413BACKGROUNDLopes MR, Oliveira MA, Pereira VO, Lemos IP, Auler JO Jr, Michard F. Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2007;11(5):R100. doi: 10.1186/cc6117.
PMID: 17822565BACKGROUNDMcKendry M, McGloin H, Saberi D, Caudwell L, Brady AR, Singer M. Randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of a nurse delivered, flow monitored protocol for optimisation of circulatory status after cardiac surgery. BMJ. 2004 Jul 31;329(7460):258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38156.767118.7C. Epub 2004 Jul 8.
PMID: 15242867BACKGROUNDBoldt J, Ince C. The impact of fluid therapy on microcirculation and tissue oxygenation in hypovolemic patients: a review. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Aug;36(8):1299-308. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1912-7. Epub 2010 May 26.
PMID: 20502873BACKGROUNDRahbari NN, Zimmermann JB, Schmidt T, Koch M, Weigand MA, Weitz J. Meta-analysis of standard, restrictive and supplemental fluid administration in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2009 Apr;96(4):331-41. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6552.
PMID: 19283742BACKGROUNDChoi JM, Lee YK, Yoo H, Lee S, Kim HY, Kim YK. Relationship between Stroke Volume Variation and Blood Transfusion during Liver Transplantation. Int J Med Sci. 2016 Feb 20;13(3):235-9. doi: 10.7150/ijms.14188. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 26941584BACKGROUNDCorrea-Gallego C, Tan KS, Arslan-Carlon V, Gonen M, Denis SC, Langdon-Embry L, Grant F, Kingham TP, DeMatteo RP, Allen PJ, D'Angelica MI, Jarnagin WR, Fischer M. Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Using Stroke Volume Variation for Resuscitation after Low Central Venous Pressure-Assisted Liver Resection: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Aug;221(2):591-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.050. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
PMID: 26206652BACKGROUNDLim C, Audureau E, Salloum C, Levesque E, Lahat E, Merle JC, Compagnon P, Dhonneur G, Feray C, Azoulay D. Acute kidney injury following hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: incidence, risk factors and prognostic value. HPB (Oxford). 2016 Jun;18(6):540-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 7.
PMID: 27317959BACKGROUNDSlankamenac K, Breitenstein S, Held U, Beck-Schimmer B, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. Development and validation of a prediction score for postoperative acute renal failure following liver resection. Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):720-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bdd840.
PMID: 19809295BACKGROUNDSaner F. Kidney failure following liver resection. Transplant Proc. 2008 May;40(4):1221-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.03.068.
PMID: 18555153BACKGROUNDPeres LA, Bredt LC, Cipriani RF. Acute renal injury after partial hepatectomy. World J Hepatol. 2016 Jul 28;8(21):891-901. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i21.891.
PMID: 27478539BACKGROUNDJarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, Ben-Porat L, Little S, Corvera C, Weber S, Blumgart LH. Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg. 2002 Oct;236(4):397-406; discussion 406-7. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000029003.66466.B3.
PMID: 12368667BACKGROUNDMoug SJ, Smith D, Wilson IS, Leen E, Horgan PG. The renal sequelae of a novel triphasic approach to blood loss reduction during hepatic resection. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006 May;32(4):435-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.01.011. Epub 2006 Mar 7.
PMID: 16520017BACKGROUNDGiannini EG, Testa R, Savarino V. Liver enzyme alteration: a guide for clinicians. CMAJ. 2005 Feb 1;172(3):367-79. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040752.
PMID: 15684121BACKGROUNDOlthof PB, Huiskens J, Schulte NR, Wicherts DA, Besselink MG, Busch OR, Heger M, van Gulik TM. Postoperative peak transaminases correlate with morbidity and mortality after liver resection. HPB (Oxford). 2016 Nov;18(11):915-921. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.07.016. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
PMID: 27600437BACKGROUNDSiu J, McCall J, Connor S. Systematic review of pathophysiological changes following hepatic resection. HPB (Oxford). 2014 May;16(5):407-21. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12164. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
PMID: 23991862BACKGROUNDYu LH, Yu WL, Zhao T, Wu MC, Fu XH, Zhang YJ. Post-operative delayed elevation of ALT correlates with early death in patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma and Post-hepatectomy Liver Failure. HPB (Oxford). 2018 Apr;20(4):321-326. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.10.001. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
PMID: 29373299BACKGROUNDChoi SS, Kim SH, Kim YK. Fluid management in living donor hepatectomy: Recent issues and perspectives. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec 7;21(45):12757-66. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i45.12757.
PMID: 26668500BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yuan-Yi Chia, Director
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Kai-Wei Hsieh, physician
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
- STUDY CHAIR
We-Yu Chen, physician
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2022
First Posted
May 4, 2022
Study Start
February 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2018
Study Completion
December 31, 2018
Last Updated
July 1, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share