NCT05359549

Brief Summary

  • Background Replacement of two missing adjacent teeth is considered a difficult treatment in implant dentistry and even more challenging if located in the anterior region due to aesthetic demands. As well peri-implant bone contour as soft tissue volume is compromised at start of the treatment and difficult to restore. The question is if this reconstruction will be stable in the longterm. Full-scale evaluation of adjacent implant placement with crown rehabilitation in the aesthetic region with a follow-up of at least 10 years is underreported in this field of implant dentistry.
  • Main research question The aim of this observational study was to analyze peri-implant bone changes, mucosa levels, aesthetic ratings and patient-reported satisfaction with the maxillary aesthetic region following implant placement with crown restoration after a 10-years follow-up period.
  • Design (including population, confounders/outcomes) The study design is an observational study of a group of patients with two missing adjacent teeth in the maxillary aesthetic region which was treated 10 years ago with dental implant placement and an implant-supported restorations. Outcomes: primary outcome is the change in marginal peri-implant bone level 10 years after placing the definitive restoration. Secondary outcome measures will be implant and restoration survival and changes in interproximal peri-implant mucosa, midfacial peri-implant mucosal level , aesthetic outcome assessed by means of an objective index and patients' satisfaction using a questionnaire.
  • Expected results Stable peri-implant bone levels, stable peri-implant soft tissue levels, high implant and restoration survival rate and satisfied patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2022

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 29, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 4, 2022

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 6, 2022

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

March 30, 2025

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

March 29, 2022

Last Update Submit

March 28, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

dental implants

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in peri-implant marginal bone level

    Change in peri-implant marginal bone level along the implant side measured on radiographs in millimetres

    Comparison initial radiograph with radiograph after 10 years

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Implant survival

    10 years

  • Restoration survival

    10 years

  • Peri-implant soft tissue health

    Status at 10 years

  • Patient satisfaction

    Satisfaction at 10 years

Study Arms (1)

Two adjacent dental implants

25 patients with two missing adjacent teeth in the maxillary aesthetic region which was treated 10 years ago with dental implant placement and an implant-supported restorations.

Device: Two endosseous dental implants (NobelReplace Groovy®) were placed 10 years ago

Interventions

All patients were 10 years ago referred to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (University of Groningen, University Medical Hospital) because of having two failing teeth in the maxillary aesthetic region and were treated with dental implant placement and implant-supported restorations. Patients will have a regular routine control visit (as part of regular follow-up of these patients)

Two adjacent dental implants

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

All patients were 10 years ago referred to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (University of Groningen, University Medical Hospital) because of having two failing teeth in the maxillary aesthetic region and were treated with dental implant placement and implant-supported restorations.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients, having two missing teeth in the maxillary aesthetic region, referred to the department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 10 years ago and treated with dental implant placement and implant-supported restorations. At the time of treatment:
  • The patient was 18 years or older;
  • The failing teeth were an incisor (central or lateral), cuspid or first bicuspid in the maxilla; the adjacent teeth are natural teeth;
  • Sufficient healthy and vital bone to insert a dental implant with a minimum length of 10 mm and at least 3.5 mm in diameter with initial stability \> 45 Ncm
  • The implant site was free from infection;
  • Adequate oral hygiene (modified plaque index and modified sulcus bleeding index ≤ 1);
  • Sufficient mesio-distal, bucco-lingual, and interocclusal space for placement of an anatomic restoration;
  • The patient was capable of understanding and giving informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Medical and general contraindications for the surgical procedures;
  • Presence of an active and uncontrolled periodontal disease;
  • Bruxism;
  • Smoking
  • A history of local radiotherapy to the head and neck region.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dept Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery UMCG

Groningen, Provincie Groningen, 9713GZ, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Tymstra N, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Den Hartog L, Stellingsma K, Meijer HJ. Treatment outcome of two adjacent implant crowns with different implant platform designs in the aesthetic zone: a 1-year randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Jan;38(1):74-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01638.x. Epub 2010 Nov 10.

    PMID: 21062337BACKGROUND
  • Van Nimwegen WG, Raghoebar GM, Stellingsma K, Tymstra N, Vissink A, Meijer HJ. Treatment Outcome of Two Adjacent Implant-Supported Restorations with Different Implant Platform Designs in the Esthetic Region: A Five-Year Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Prosthodont. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):490-8. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4199.

    PMID: 26340009BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anodontia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth AbnormalitiesStomatognathic System AbnormalitiesStomatognathic DiseasesTooth DiseasesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Study Officials

  • Henny JA Meijer, Prof

    University Medical Center Groningen

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
10 Years
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2022

First Posted

May 4, 2022

Study Start

October 6, 2022

Primary Completion

May 1, 2023

Study Completion

May 1, 2023

Last Updated

March 30, 2025

Record last verified: 2023-10

Locations