Scar Mobilization Techniques vs Core Stability Exercises on Scar Tissue and Lumbopelvic Pain

NCT05355181 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: REC/Lhr/22/0504 Anam
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 27
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The study will be a Randomized clinical trial to check the effects of scar mobilization techniques with and without core stabilization exercises on scar tissue mobility and lumbopelvic pain in females after a cesarean section suffering from back pain and restricted scar mobility. Duration of study will 6 months, convenient sampling technique used, subject following eligibility criteria from Rafiqa Medical Centre, Sargodha and Fatima Hospital, Sargodha, will randomly be allocated in two groups via lottery method, baseline assessment will be done, Group A participants will be given baseline treatment along with scar mobilization and core stabilization exercises, Group B participants will be given baseline treatment along with scar mobilization for 3 weeks. On the 5th and 9th day, the post-intervention assessment will be done via, Manual Scar mobility testing, Vancouver Scar Scale, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, and Oswestry Disability Index. 3 sessions per week will be given.

Conditions

Scar Tissue; Back Pain

Keywords

Cicatrix; Pelvic Girdle Pain; Postpartum Period; scar; back pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

• Manual Scar mobility testing

  The physiotherapist evaluates the appearance and mobility of a healed scar. Mobility is checked by placing the hand or fingertips on or around it. By moving the scar in different directions, the skin's displacement in relation to the fascia is checked. Apart from the free movement of the scar in all directions in the frontal plane, lifting should also be possible.

  up to 3 weeks

• Vancouver Scar Scale

  The VSS evaluates only 4 physical scar features-pigmentation, vascularity, pliability, and height-and the rater assigns an ordinal value for each feature Each feature has word descriptions for all possible options to help the rater assign a proper value. The values translate into numeric scores, which are then summed into an overall score ranging from 0 to 13 points.

  up to 3 weeks

• Numeric Pain Rating Scale

  The NPRS is a segmented numeric scale in which the respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain. The common format is a horizontal bar or line. NPRS is anchored by terms describing pain severity extremes

  up to 3 weeks

• Oswestry Disability Index

  The Oswestry Disability Index is considered the 'gold standard' of low back functional outcome tools. It has 10 different sections. For each section the total possible score is 5. If all 10 sections are completed the score is calculated and interpreted in percentage measures.

  up to 3 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Group A: scar mobilization and core stabilization exercises group

EXPERIMENTAL

Group A will perform exercises for 3 weeks. Participants will perform core stabilization exercises as well as scar mobility exercises. All exercises will be performed in 3 sessions per week for a period of 3 weeks.

Other: Scar mobilization techniques; Other: Core stabilization exercises

Group B: scar mobilization techniques group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group B will perform scar mobilization exercises for 3 weeks along with baseline treatment. All exercises will be performed in 3 sessions per week for a period of 3 weeks.

Other: Scar mobilization techniques

Interventions

Scar mobilization techniques OTHER

Scar mobilization techniques include the gentle stroking and lifting of the scar as well as moving the scar tissue in different directions. It also includes rolling, C- grip, S-grip, and ram horn mobilization of the scar tissue. Core stabilization exercises administered after cesarean section include the posture corrective exercises, abdominal draw-in, squatting, pelvis tilting, knee to chest, flexibility and stretching exercises, and bridges.

Group A: scar mobilization and core stabilization exercises group; Group B: scar mobilization techniques group

Core stabilization exercises OTHER

Core stabilization exercises

Group A: scar mobilization and core stabilization exercises group

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 20 Years - 40 Years
• Sex: female
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• Age 20 -40 years.
• Lower segment transverse incision technique used.
• Minimum 6 weeks postnatal.
• Completely healed Scar.
• Limited scar mobilization in any direction or lifting.
• No complications after the surgery.

You may not qualify if:

• Women with an abdominal hernia.
• Multiple births.
• Skin irritation or infection at the scar site.
• Diastasis Recti Abdominis
• History of abdominal surgery other than cesarean section.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Riphah International University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Rafiqa hospital

Sargodha, Punjab Province, 54700, Pakistan

Location

Related Publications (11)

• Chamorro Comesana A, Suarez Vicente MD, Docampo Ferreira T, Perez-La Fuente Varela MD, Porto Quintans MM, Pilat A. Effect of myofascial induction therapy on post-c-section scars, more than one and a half years old. Pilot study. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017 Jan;21(1):197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Jul 18.

  PMID: 28167179 BACKGROUND

• Daniszewska-Jarząb I. Manual scar therapy on the example of a caesarean section scar.

  BACKGROUND

• Ghavipanje V, Rahimi NM, Akhlaghi F. Six Weeks Effects of Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization (DNS) Training in Obese Postpartum Women With Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Biol Res Nurs. 2022 Jan;24(1):106-114. doi: 10.1177/10998004211044828. Epub 2021 Sep 23.

  PMID: 34555964 BACKGROUND

• Hui T. Effective Physical Therapy Treatment of Post-Cesarean Section Low Back Pain-Case Report. J Adv Med Med Res. 2017;22:1-5.

  BACKGROUND

• Nayyab I, Ghous M, Shakil Ur Rehman S, Yaqoob I. The effects of an exercise programme for core muscle strengthening in patients with low back pain after Caesarian-section: A single blind randomized controlled trial. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 May;71(5):1319-1325. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.596.

  PMID: 34091607 BACKGROUND

• Sakamoto A, Nakagawa H, Nakagawa H, Gamada K. Effects of exercises with a pelvic realignment device on low-back and pelvic girdle pain after childbirth: A randomized control study. J Rehabil Med. 2018 Nov 7;50(10):914-919. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2487.

  PMID: 30264849 BACKGROUND

• Saleh MSM, Botla AMM, Elbehary NAM. Effect of core stability exercises on postpartum lumbopelvic pain: A randomized controlled trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32(2):205-213. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181259.

  PMID: 30282349 BACKGROUND

• Teymuri Z, Hosseinifar M, Sirousi M. The Effect of Stabilization Exercises on Pain, Disability, and Pelvic Floor Muscle Function in Postpartum Lumbopelvic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Dec;97(12):885-891. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000993.

  PMID: 29979205 BACKGROUND

• Wasserman JB, Abraham K, Massery M, Chu J, Farrow A, Marcoux BC. Soft tissue mobilization techniques are effective in treating chronic pain following cesarean section: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Journal of Women's Health Physical Therapy. 2018;42(3):111-9.

  BACKGROUND

• Wasserman JB, Copeland M, Upp M, Abraham K. Effect of soft tissue mobilization techniques on adhesion-related pain and function in the abdomen: A systematic review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019 Apr;23(2):262-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

  PMID: 31103106 BACKGROUND

• Yalfani A, Bigdeli N, Gandomi F. Effect of isometric-isotonic exercises of core stability in women with postpartum diastasis recti and its secondary disorders (randomized controlled clinical trial). J Health Care. 2020;22:123-37.

  BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cicatrix; Back Pain; Pelvic Girdle Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Fibrosis; Pathologic Processes; Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms; Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Signs and Symptoms; Musculoskeletal Pain; Pelvic Pain

Study Officials

• Ghulam Fatima, PhD*

  Riphah International University

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: April 21, 2022
• First Posted: May 2, 2022
• Study Start: April 20, 2022
• Primary Completion: October 30, 2022
• Study Completion: November 30, 2022
• Last Updated: April 3, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

PA (1)