Effectiveness of Sodium Fusidate Ointment Compared to Petrolatum for Wound Healing Following Cauterization
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A double-blind within person randomized controlled trial study was conducted on 90 wounds in 22 subjects. All wounds were randomized to receive either sodium fusidate ointment or petrolatum following cauterization.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2022
CompletedMay 5, 2022
April 1, 2022
5 months
April 23, 2022
April 29, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Wound healing score
Wound healing score was calculated based on the erythema, edema, crusts, and reepithelization. Wound healing score is as follows: 0-4 = very good/healed, 5-8 good/healed, 9-12 moderate/not healed, and 13-16 = poor/not healed
14 days
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Erythema
14 days
Edema
14 days
Crusts
14 days
Reepithelization
14 days
Incidence of infection
14 days
Study Arms (2)
Sodium fusidate ointment
EXPERIMENTALElectrosurgery was carried out using Ellman® Surgitron. The tissue was cleaned using sterile gauze or a cotton swab that had been moistened with 0.9% NaCl. Following electrosurgery, sodium fusidate ointment was applied to the wound according to the allocation sequence. The patient also received a wound care instruction sheet. Each subject was given two or four pots of ointment that should be applied twice daily on the wound.
Petrolatum
PLACEBO COMPARATORElectrosurgery was carried out using Ellman® Surgitron. The tissue was cleaned using sterile gauze or a cotton swab that had been moistened with 0.9% NaCl. Following electrosurgery, petrolatum was applied to the wound according to the allocation sequence. The patient also received a wound care instruction sheet. Each subject was given two or four pots of ointment that should be applied twice daily on the wound.
Interventions
Sodium fusidate 2% topical ointment was applied twice daily on the wound after cauterization for 14 days.
Petrolatum ointment was applied twice daily on the wound after cauterization for 14 days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age over 20 years
- clinically diagnosed with seborrheic keratosis or acrochordon
- having minimum of two lesions and maximum of four lesions with diameter of 4-10 mm on face or neck and minimum distance between lesions of 5 cm
- providing consent to participate into the study
You may not qualify if:
- a skin bacterial infection on the other parts of body's skin
- benign tumor lesions with inflammation or secondary infection
- history of antibiotics use in the last 2 weeks or long-acting penicillin injections within the past 1 month
- history of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants use in the past 2 weeks
- using a pacemaker
- infected with Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dermatology and Venereology Clinic, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital
Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Firman Parrol, MD
Indonesia University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Allocation sequence was generated by a statistician with a computer and it was concealed from the researchers and participants. The ointment was prepared and packaged by a pharmacist. Each pot was numbered in accordance with the allocation sequence.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dermatology Resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2022
First Posted
April 29, 2022
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
May 31, 2021
Study Completion
May 31, 2021
Last Updated
May 5, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share