Automated Robotic Maneuvering System (RMS) vs Manual Reposition Maneuver in Treatment of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV)
Comparison of Treatment Efficacy of Automated Robotic Maneuvering System (RMS) Reposition Chair Versus Traditional Manual Repositioning Maneuvers in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV)
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Comparison of treatment efficacy of an automated robotic maneuvering system (RMS) repositioning chair versus manual positioning maneuvers in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Feb 2022
Shorter than P25 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 12, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 23, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2022
CompletedApril 29, 2022
April 1, 2022
2 months
April 23, 2022
April 23, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Treatments
Number of treatment necessary to achieve resolution of vertigo and nystagmus
1 month (30 days)
Treatment success
Number of subjects achieving resolution of vertigo and nystagmus after one treatment
After treatment: 1 week - 1 month (30 days)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Vertigo-Dizziness Imbalance (VDI) questionnaire
1 month (30 days)
Adverse events
1 month (30 days)
Study Arms (2)
Robotic Maneuvering System (RMS)
EXPERIMENTALBPPV subtype diagnosis and corresponding treatment will be performed using automated RMS chair and recorded with video frenzel goggle. In cases of posterior canal involvement, Epley's maneuver will be used for canalithiasis and cupulolithiasis. Semont maneuver will be used as a second-line treatment for cupulolithiasis, in cases of initial failure. In cases of horizontal canal involvement, Barbecue (Lempert) maneuver will be used. If canalithiasis or cupulolithiasis is diagnosed, Gufoni's maneuver will be performed. In cases of anterior canal involvement, Yacovino's maneuver will be used.
Canalith Reposition Maneuver
ACTIVE COMPARATORBPPV subtype diagnosis and corresponding treatment will be performed with manual repositioning maneuvers and recorded with video frenzel goggle. In cases of posterior canal involvement, Epley's maneuver will be used. In cases of horizontal canal involvement, Log roll maneuver will be used. In cases of anterior canal involvement, Yacovino's maneuver will be used.
Interventions
Patients are strapped to the chair with a safety harness, and video fenzel goggle are worn. Automated diagnostic procedures are performed to determine vertigo subtype and orientation (Left/Right) (described below). 1. Dix-Hallpike (for posterior canal involvement) 2. Supine roll (for horizontal canal involvement) 3. (Optional) Deep Head Hanging (for anterior canal involvement) If nystagmus is detected during automated diagnostic maneuvers, BPPV subtype is diagnosed, and corresponding automated treatment maneuver will be performed (described below). 1. Epley's and/or Semont's maneuver (for posterior canal involvement) 2. Barbecue and/or Gufoni's maneuver (for horizontal canal involvement) 3. Yacovino's maneuver (for anterior canal involvement) 10 minutes after performing automated treatment maneuver, provocative diagnostic test maneuver was performed once again to ensure successful intervention. A follow-up was done one week later at the earliest.
Patients were seated on a examination table and given videonystagmography goggles (VNG). Manual diagnostic procedures are performed to determine vertigo subtype and orientation. The manual diagnostic procedures for Left and Right sided semicircular canals are: 1. Dix-Hallpike (for posterior canal involvement) 2. Supine roll and Bow and Lean (for horizontal canal involvement) If nystagmus is detected during diagnostic maneuvers, BPPV subtype is diagnosed, and corresponding treatment maneuvers will be performed manually. The automated treatment maneuvers are: 1. Epley's maneuver (for posterior canal involvement) 2. Barbecue and/or Gufoni's maneuver (for horizontal canal involvement) Patients were called back for a follow up 2 days after performing manual treatment maneuvers. Provocative diagnostic testing maneuvers were performed again to ensure successful intervention. A second follow-up was done one week later at the earliest.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Characteristic positional nystagmus (for BPPV)
- Positive Dix-Hallpike
- Positive supine roll test
- Positive Deep Head Hanging
- Vertigo-Dizziness Imbalance symptom scores compatible with BPPV
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant patients
- Patients who have taken vertigo suppressing agents (Dimenhydrinate) in the last 48 hours
- Patients taller than 200 cm (2.0 m)
- Patients who have had a cardiovascular or neurosurgical operation in the last month
- Patients with retinal detachment and/or glaucoma
- Lack of treatment cooperation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Haseki Sultangazi Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Sultangazi, 34265, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (8)
Tan J, Yu D, Feng Y, Song Q, You J, Shi H, Yin S. Comparative study of the efficacy of the canalith repositioning procedure versus the vertigo treatment and rehabilitation chair. Acta Otolaryngol. 2014 Jul;134(7):704-8. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2014.899711. Epub 2014 May 7.
PMID: 24807849BACKGROUNDChoung YH, Shin YR, Kahng H, Park K, Choi SJ. 'Bow and lean test' to determine the affected ear of horizontal canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Laryngoscope. 2006 Oct;116(10):1776-81. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000231291.44818.be.
PMID: 17003735BACKGROUNDWest N, Hansen S, Moller MN, Bloch SL, Klokker M. Repositioning chairs in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: implications and clinical outcome. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Mar;273(3):573-80. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3583-z. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
PMID: 25749489BACKGROUNDBhattacharyya N, Baugh RF, Orvidas L, Barrs D, Bronston LJ, Cass S, Chalian AA, Desmond AL, Earll JM, Fife TD, Fuller DC, Judge JO, Mann NR, Rosenfeld RM, Schuring LT, Steiner RW, Whitney SL, Haidari J; American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. Clinical practice guideline: benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Nov;139(5 Suppl 4):S47-81. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.08.022.
PMID: 18973840BACKGROUNDPedersen MF, Eriksen HH, Kjaersgaard JB, Abrahamsen ER, Hougaard DD. Treatment of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo with the TRV Reposition Chair. J Int Adv Otol. 2020 Aug;16(2):176-182. doi: 10.5152/iao.2020.6320.
PMID: 32784154BACKGROUNDNakayama M, Epley JM. BPPV and variants: improved treatment results with automated, nystagmus-based repositioning. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Jul;133(1):107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.03.027.
PMID: 16025062BACKGROUNDRichard-Vitton T, Seidermann L, Fraget P, Mouillet J, Astier P, Chays A. [Benign positional vertigo, an armchair for diagnosis and for treatment: description and significance]. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2005;126(4):249-51. French.
PMID: 16496552BACKGROUNDYanik B, Kulcu DG, Kurtais Y, Boynukalin S, Kurtarah H, Gokmen D. The reliability and validity of the Vertigo Symptom Scale and the Vertigo Dizziness Imbalance Questionnaires in a Turkish patient population with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. J Vestib Res. 2008;18(2-3):159-70.
PMID: 19126986BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Murat H Ozkul, M.D.
StatejikYG
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- Every enrolled patients records were randomized, and based on the outcome, subjects were either assigned to control or experimental arm groups. A report detailing the outcome, but omitting the method of treatment, was given to patients and their care provider.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief Medical Officer (CMO)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2022
First Posted
April 29, 2022
Study Start
February 15, 2022
Primary Completion
April 12, 2022
Study Completion
April 23, 2022
Last Updated
April 29, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share