NCT05352503

Brief Summary

Virtual reality application, which is a non-pharmacological method, is used for different purposes in many different fields. One of the areas where virtual reality application is used is health services. Its use in the field of obstetrics is new. Virtual reality application is often in pregnancy; it is used to reduce pain, stress and anxiety levels, exercise training and train pregnant women to effectively manage their pain during childbirth. Although pregnancy is a normal physiological process, adverse situations may occur that can make every pregnancy risky. Threatened premature birth, which is called the onset of uterine contractions without cervical changes between the 20th and 37th weeks of pregnancy, is also among these risk groups. Pregnant women diagnosed with the threat of premature birth are usually treated by hospitalization. Psychological problems such as stress, fear and anxiety may develop in pregnant women who are on bed rest in the hospital. In these pregnant women, mother-infant attachment may also be adversely affected. Pregnant women who are hospitalized and taken to bed rest due to risky pregnancy need to be informed and supported by health personnel. The midwife's spending enough time with the pregnant woman, keeping in touch and meeting her needs increase satisfaction in terms of care. When the literature was examined, it was determined that pregnant women were satisfied with the virtual reality application and thus increased care satisfaction.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
126

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 5, 2022

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 23, 2022

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 28, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 20, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 25, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

September 27, 2022

Status Verified

September 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

April 23, 2022

Last Update Submit

September 25, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Psychological StressAnxietyPrenatal attachmentPleasureVirtual RealityPreterm Birth

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21)

    Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21); It was created as an abbreviation of DASS-42 developed by Lovibond and Lovibond (1995) (Lovibond and Lovibond 1995). The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Sarıçam in 2018. Scale "Depression (3rd, 5th, 10th, 13th, 16th, 17th, 21st)", "Anxiety (2nd, 4th, 7th, 9th, 15th, 19th, 20.)" and "Stress (1st, 6th, 8th, 11th, 12th, 14th, 18th)" and 21 questions. Items in the scale; 4-point Likert-type scoring ranging from ''(0) never', ''(1) sometimes and sometimes'', ''(2) quite often'' and ''(3) always'' evaluated over. A minimum of 0 and a maximum of 21 points can be obtained from each sub-dimension. The higher the score, the higher the level of depression, anxiety and stress (Sarıçam 2018). In this study, the 'stress sub-dimension' of the DASS-21 scale will be used

    first day

  • State Anxiety Scale

    It was developed by Spielberger et al. in 1970 (Spielberger et al. 1970). Its adaptation to Turkish society, validity and reliability were done by Öner and Le Compte in 1985. The State Anxiety Scale consists of 20 items. The items expressing the emotions and behaviors in the scales vary in 4 levels as "(1) Not at all", "(2) A little", "(3) A lot" and "(4) Completely". It is evaluated on a 5-point Likert-type scoring system. A high score indicates a high level of anxiety. A score of six or less indicates no anxiety, 37-42 indicates mild anxiety, and a score of 43 and above indicates high anxiety (Öner and Le Compte 1985).

    first day

  • The Prenatal Attachment Inventory

    Prenatal Attachment Inventory; It is a 21-item scale developed by Mary Muller in 1993 to explain the feelings, thoughts and situations experienced by women during pregnancy and to determine the level of attachment to the fetus during the prenatal period (Muller 1993). The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was carried out by Yılmaz and Beji in 2009. Participants scored each item on a 4-point Likert-type rating scale as "(1) Never", "(2) Sometimes", "(3) Often", "(4) Always". evaluates over. A minimum of 21 and a maximum of 84 points can be obtained from the scale. As the score obtained by the pregnant increases, the level of attachment increases. The applicability of the scale for pregnant women at 20 weeks of gestation and above was found to be reliable and valid. Yılmaz and Beji found the Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient as 0.84 in the internal consistency analysis of the scale (Yılmaz and Beji 3013).

    first day

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21)

    second day

  • State Anxiety Scale

    second day

  • The Prenatal Attachment Inventory

    second day

  • Virtual Reality Glasses (SGG) Application Satisfaction Level Information Form

    second day

Study Arms (2)

watching video with virtual reality glasses

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Watching videos with nature images accompanied by nature sounds with virtual reality glasses

routine maintenance, no intervention

NO INTERVENTION

Interventions

The video with nature images accompanied by the sounds of nature with virtual reality glasses will be watched 3 times a day for at least 5 minutes for 2 days.

watching video with virtual reality glasses

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • who are in the age group of 18 and over,
  • Able to speak Turkish and express himself in Turkish,
  • Not visually or hearing impaired,
  • Diagnosed with the threat of premature birth,
  • Between 24-37 weeks of gestation,
  • Primiparous,
  • Single pregnancy,
  • Open to communication, spiritually and mentally healthy,
  • Pregnant women who are married and living with their spouses.

You may not qualify if:

  • In addition to the diagnosis of threat of preterm birth, other diagnoses (preeclampsia, fetal distress, premature rupture of membranes, gestational diabetes, bleeding, etc.)
  • Having a chronic disease
  • Women who are pregnant by assisted reproductive techniques.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Selcuk University Faculty of Health Sciences

Konya, 42130, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Frey DP, Bauer ME, Bell CL, Low LK, Hassett AL, Cassidy RB, Boyer KD, Sharar SR. Virtual Reality Analgesia in Labor: The VRAIL Pilot Study-A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Trial Suggesting Benefit of Immersive Virtual Reality Analgesia in Unmedicated Laboring Women. Anesth Analg. 2019 Jun;128(6):e93-e96. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003649.

    PMID: 31094789BACKGROUND
  • Garcia-Blanco A, Diago V, Serrano De La Cruz V, Hervas D, Chafer-Pericas C, Vento M. Can stress biomarkers predict preterm birth in women with threatened preterm labor? Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017 Sep;83:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.05.021. Epub 2017 May 25.

    PMID: 28558282BACKGROUND
  • Glover V. Maternal depression, anxiety and stress during pregnancy and child outcome; what needs to be done. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Jan;28(1):25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.08.017. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

    PMID: 24090740BACKGROUND
  • Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008 Jan 5;371(9606):75-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4.

    PMID: 18177778BACKGROUND
  • Grigoriadis S, Graves L, Peer M, Mamisashvili L, Tomlinson G, Vigod SN, Dennis CL, Steiner M, Brown C, Cheung A, Dawson H, Rector NA, Guenette M, Richter M. Maternal Anxiety During Pregnancy and the Association With Adverse Perinatal Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 4;79(5):17r12011. doi: 10.4088/JCP.17r12011.

    PMID: 30192449BACKGROUND
  • Gur EY, Apay SE. The effect of cognitive behavioral techniques using virtual reality on birth pain: a randomized controlled trial. Midwifery. 2020 Dec;91:102856. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102856. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

    PMID: 33478718BACKGROUND
  • Hajesmaeel-Gohari S, Sarpourian F, Shafiei E. Virtual reality applications to assist pregnant women: a scoping review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 25;21(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03725-5.

    PMID: 33765969BACKGROUND
  • Hoyer J, Wieder G, Hofler M, Krause L, Wittchen HU, Martini J. Do lifetime anxiety disorders (anxiety liability) and pregnancy-related anxiety predict complications during pregnancy and delivery? Early Hum Dev. 2020 May;144:105022. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105022. Epub 2020 Mar 25.

    PMID: 32220767BACKGROUND
  • Lilliecreutz C, Laren J, Sydsjo G, Josefsson A. Effect of maternal stress during pregnancy on the risk for preterm birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jan 15;16:5. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0775-x.

    PMID: 26772181BACKGROUND
  • Kilic S, Dereli Yilmaz S. Virtual Reality Headset Simulating a Nature Environment to Improve Health Outcomes in Pregnant Women: A Randomized-Controlled Trial. Clin Nurs Res. 2023 Nov;32(8):1104-1114. doi: 10.1177/10547738231184923. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stress, PsychologicalAnxiety DisordersPremature Birth

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehaviorMental DisordersObstetric Labor, PrematureObstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2022

First Posted

April 28, 2022

Study Start

April 5, 2022

Primary Completion

July 20, 2022

Study Completion

September 25, 2022

Last Updated

September 27, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share
Shared Documents
ICF

Locations