NCT05351398

Brief Summary

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become the mainstream recommended treatment for advanced gastric cancer. However, due to the heterogeneity of gastric cancer, part of some patients fail to benefit from the treatment. This project aims to compare the clinical efficacy of individualized neoadjuvant therapy based on patient-derived organoid drug sensitivity assay and traditional regimen, exploring the advantages and disadvantages of these two treatments. And access the safety and clinical value of the personalized neoadjuvant therapy based on patient-derived organoid drug sensitivity assay in advanced gastric cancer.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
54

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2022

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 22, 2022

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 28, 2022

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2023

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

April 28, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

April 22, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 22, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

advanced gastric carcinomapatient-derived organoidpersonalized treatmentNeoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Objective Response Rate

    proportion of patients whose tumor volume reduced to a predetermined value and maintain the minimum time limit.

    an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • postoperative complication

    an average of 1 year

  • postoperative tumor regression grading

    an average of 1 year

  • 3-year recurrence rate

    an average of 3 year

  • chemotherapy tolerance and adverse reaction rate

    an average of 1 year

  • R0 resection rate

    an average of 1 year

Study Arms (2)

PDO group

Patients with stage III gastric cancer who need neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical surgery are recruited. And they are treated with individualized neoadjuvant therapy under the guidance of a patient-derived organoid (PDO)-based drug sensitivity assay.

Drug: PDO groupDrug: Traditional group

Traditional group

Patients with stage III gastric cancer who need neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical surgery are recruited. In this group, patients are treated with the SOX regimen.

Drug: PDO groupDrug: Traditional group

Interventions

Patients with stage III gastric cancer who need neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical surgery are recruited. And they are treated with individualized neoadjuvant therapy under the guidance of a patient-derived organoid (PDO)-based drug sensitivity assay.

PDO groupTraditional group

Patients with stage III gastric cancer who need neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical surgery are recruited. In this group, patients are treated with the SOX regimen.

PDO groupTraditional group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with advanced gastric cancer whose tumor is located in the stomach and need neoadjuvant therapy before radical surgery.

You may qualify if:

  • Age between 18 and 80 years
  • A biopsy proven histological diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia
  • Tumor located at stomach
  • Chest/abdomen/pelvis CT scans or gastric cancer staging CT scan evaluate the clinical stage of tumor as stage III:
  • A. preoperative staging cT3-4N1-2 B. excluding distant organ metastasis (M0)
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score ≤1
  • Willing to participate and informed consent signed

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Synchronous or heterochronic malignant carcinomas
  • History of malignant carcinomas
  • Clinical evidence of metastasis
  • Abnormal heart, lung, liver, kidney, hematopoietic function and bone marrow reserve function, unable to tolerate surgical treatment and chemotherapy
  • Mental illness or other serious cardiovascular disease
  • Emergency procedure

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Shanghai Ruijin Hospttal

Shanghai, Sahnghai, 200000, China

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Cao W, Chen HD, Yu YW, Li N, Chen WQ. Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020. Chin Med J (Engl). 2021 Mar 17;134(7):783-791. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001474.

  • Kanaji S, Suzuki S, Matsuda Y, Hasegawa H, Yamamoto M, Yamashita K, Oshikiri T, Matsuda T, Nakamura T, Sumi Y, Kakeji Y. Recent updates in perioperative chemotherapy and recurrence pattern of gastric cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2018 Aug 29;2(6):400-405. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12199. eCollection 2018 Nov.

  • Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, Scarffe JH, Lofts FJ, Falk SJ, Iveson TJ, Smith DB, Langley RE, Verma M, Weeden S, Chua YJ, MAGIC Trial Participants. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 6;355(1):11-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055531.

  • Oh SY, Kwon HC, Jeong SH, Joo YT, Lee YJ, Cho Sh, Kang MH, Go SI, Lee GW, Kim Hg, Kang JH. A phase II study of S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOx) combination chemotherapy as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Invest New Drugs. 2012 Feb;30(1):350-6. doi: 10.1007/s10637-010-9507-2. Epub 2010 Aug 13.

  • Xu R, He X, Wufuli R, Su Y, Ma L, Chen R, Han Z, Wang F, Liu J. Choice of Capecitabine or S1 in Combination with Oxaliplatin based on Thymidine Phosphorylase and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Expression Status in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer. J Gastric Cancer. 2019 Dec;19(4):408-416. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e40. Epub 2019 Nov 13.

  • Vlachogiannis G, Hedayat S, Vatsiou A, Jamin Y, Fernandez-Mateos J, Khan K, Lampis A, Eason K, Huntingford I, Burke R, Rata M, Koh DM, Tunariu N, Collins D, Hulkki-Wilson S, Ragulan C, Spiteri I, Moorcraft SY, Chau I, Rao S, Watkins D, Fotiadis N, Bali M, Darvish-Damavandi M, Lote H, Eltahir Z, Smyth EC, Begum R, Clarke PA, Hahne JC, Dowsett M, de Bono J, Workman P, Sadanandam A, Fassan M, Sansom OJ, Eccles S, Starling N, Braconi C, Sottoriva A, Robinson SP, Cunningham D, Valeri N. Patient-derived organoids model treatment response of metastatic gastrointestinal cancers. Science. 2018 Feb 23;359(6378):920-926. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2774.

  • Driehuis E, Clevers H. CRISPR/Cas 9 genome editing and its applications in organoids. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2017 Mar 1;312(3):G257-G265. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00410.2016. Epub 2017 Jan 26.

Study Officials

  • Jing Sun, PhD

    Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2022

First Posted

April 28, 2022

Study Start

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion

June 1, 2023

Study Completion

December 1, 2023

Last Updated

April 28, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Locations