Comparative Study Between ESPB Versus IV Morphine as Postoperative Analgesia After Spine Surgeries .
Comparative Study Between Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Intravenous Morphine as Postoperative Analgesia After Spine Surgeries .
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Postoperative pain is often severe in patients undergoing lumbar surgery. Due to postoperative pain, patients are unwilling to get out of bed at an early stage, which affects their recovery. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) as a new trunk fascia block technique was proposed in 2016. ESPB has aroused the interest of many nerve block experts. The benefits of ESPB are not yet demonstrated. The specific mechanism is still controversial. The erector spinae block is achieved by injecting the local anesthetic solution (with possible adjuvants) between the erector spinae muscles (iliocostalis, longissimus, spinalis/ from lateral to medial) and the transverse process . The technique is performed under ultrasound guidance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 15, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 28, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 20, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2024
CompletedNovember 7, 2023
November 1, 2023
11 days
March 15, 2022
November 6, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative analgesia .
The study will include 60 adult patients undergoing uncomplicated spine surgery under general anesthesia. At the end of operation , Patients will be randomly divided using closed enveloped method into two equal groups. * Group 1, (30 patients) will receive bilateral ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block using plain bupivacaine 100 mg diluted to volume using normal saline to achieve 50% concentration ( 50 mg plain pubivicaine in each side ). * Group 2, (30 patients) will receive 0.1 mg /kg of intravenous morphine diluted to 10 ml volume using saline at the end of the operation. postoperative pain assessment according to visual analogue scale ( VAS ) within 24 hours after the surgery. 0 - 3 mild pain ( better outcome ) 4 - 6 moderate pain 7 - 10 severe pain \> 10 unbearable pain ( worst outcome)
24 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Avoid side effects of using systemic morphine.
24 hours after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Erector Spinae Plane block group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR(30 patients) will receive bilateral ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block using plain bupivacaine 100 mg diluted to volume using normal saline to achieve 50% concentration ( 50 mg plain pubivicaine in each side ).
Intravenous Morphine group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR(30 patients) will receive 0.1 mg /kg of intravenous morphine diluted to 10 ml volume using saline at the end of the operation.
Interventions
The erector spinae block is achieved by injecting the local anesthetic solution (with possible adjuvants) between the erector spinae muscles (iliocostalis, longissimus, spinalis/ from lateral to medial) and the transverse process . The technique is performed under ultrasound guidance.
patients will receive 0.1 mg /kg of intravenous morphine diluted to 10 ml volume using saline at the end of the operation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Lumbar Disc Prolapse.
- Fracture Lumbar Vertebrae
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal.
- Drug abuse.
- Patient with significant neurological, psychiatric or neuromuscular disease.
- Chronic pain on medicine.
- known allergy to the study medications.
- Infection at the site of infiltration.
- Patients with bleeding tendency.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sohag Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Sohag University Hospital
Sohag, Egypt
Related Publications (4)
Hamilton DL, Manickam B. Erector spinae plane block for pain relief in rib fractures. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):474-475. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex013. No abstract available.
PMID: 28203765BACKGROUNDForero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
PMID: 27501016BACKGROUNDMelvin JP, Schrot RJ, Chu GM, Chin KJ. Low thoracic erector spinae plane block for perioperative analgesia in lumbosacral spine surgery: a case series. Can J Anaesth. 2018 Sep;65(9):1057-1065. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1145-8. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
PMID: 29704223BACKGROUNDTseng V, Xu JL. Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery: Is There a Better Option? J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2021 Jan;33(1):92. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000631. No abstract available.
PMID: 31343504BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- resident doctor at Anasthesia department sohag university hospital
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 15, 2022
First Posted
April 28, 2022
Study Start
November 20, 2023
Primary Completion
December 1, 2023
Study Completion
January 1, 2024
Last Updated
November 7, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11