Gold Factor on Knee Joint Health and Function
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Microscopic Doses Oral Administration of Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs) on Knee Joint Health and Function
1 other identifier
interventional
51
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical study was to determine whether gold nanoparticles (AuNP) supplement holds clinical value in improving joint health, function, and quality of life for arthritis patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 3, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 14, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2022
CompletedJuly 12, 2022
July 1, 2022
5 months
April 14, 2022
July 11, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (11)
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): Pain score
The KOOS survey was chosen due to its repeatability, and it gave scores of 0-100 for four separate categories: Symptoms, Pain, Function \& Daily Living, Sports \& Recreational Activities, and Quality of Life. Under KOOS scoring guidelines, a score of zero represents extreme knee problems, and 100 represents complete function of the knee with no pain, discomfort, or other joint related problems.
20 weeks
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): Symptoms score
The KOOS survey was chosen due to its repeatability, and it gave scores of 0-100 for four separate categories: Symptoms, Pain, Function \& Daily Living, Sports \& Recreational Activities, and Quality of Life. Under KOOS scoring guidelines, a score of zero represents extreme knee problems, and 100 represents complete function of the knee with no pain, discomfort, or other joint related problems.
20 weeks
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): Function in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score
The KOOS survey was chosen due to its repeatability, and it gave scores of 0-100 for four separate categories: Symptoms, Pain, Function \& Daily Living, Sports \& Recreational Activities, and Quality of Life. Under KOOS scoring guidelines, a score of zero represents extreme knee problems, and 100 represents complete function of the knee with no pain, discomfort, or other joint related problems.
20 weeks
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): Function in Sports and Recreation score
The KOOS survey was chosen due to its repeatability, and it gave scores of 0-100 for four separate categories: Symptoms, Pain, Function \& Daily Living, Sports \& Recreational Activities, and Quality of Life. Under KOOS scoring guidelines, a score of zero represents extreme knee problems, and 100 represents complete function of the knee with no pain, discomfort, or other joint related problems.
20 weeks
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): Quality of Life score
The KOOS survey was chosen due to its repeatability, and it gave scores of 0-100 for four separate categories: Symptoms, Pain, Function \& Daily Living, Sports \& Recreational Activities, and Quality of Life. Under KOOS scoring guidelines, a score of zero represents extreme knee problems, and 100 represents complete function of the knee with no pain, discomfort, or other joint related problems.
20 weeks
C-Reactive Protein
C-Reactive Protein levels were measured at T0 for baseline scores, and then measured again at T1, T2, and T3. As CRP levels are biomarkers of systemic inflammation, it was expected to see a decrease in CRP levels when taking AuNP Supplement.
20 weeks
Range of Motion Bilateral Flexion score
All participants completed a physical assessment conducted by an assigned physical therapist: Range of Motion Bilateral Flexion, Leg Press, Walk Test, Sit-to Stand and Single Leg Squats.
20 weeks
Leg Press repetition number
All participants completed a physical assessment conducted by an assigned physical therapist: Range of Motion Bilateral Flexion, Leg Press, Walk Test, Sit-to Stand and Single Leg Squats.
20 weeks
6-minute Walk distance (meter)
All participants completed a physical assessment conducted by an assigned physical therapist: Range of Motion Bilateral Flexion, Leg Press, Walk Test, Sit-to Stand and Single Leg Squats.
20 weeks
Sit-to Stand repetition number
All participants completed a physical assessment conducted by an assigned physical therapist: Range of Motion Bilateral Flexion, Leg Press, Walk Test, Sit-to Stand and Single Leg Squats.
20 weeks
Single Leg Squats repetition number
All participants completed a physical assessment conducted by an assigned physical therapist: Range of Motion Bilateral Flexion, Leg Press, Walk Test, Sit-to Stand and Single Leg Squats.
20 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Number of Event for Loss of Balance (LOB)
20 weeks
Movement efficiency index
20 weeks
Squat Lumbar Flexion Deviation score
20 weeks
Squat Lateral Shift Deviation score
20 weeks
single leg squat speed
20 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Phase 1: double-blinded placebo-controlled Supplement vs Placebo
OTHERPhase 1 (8 weeks): Supplement and Placebo groups ingested 3 oz of Supplement and Placebo per day respectively for the first four weeks as a loading dose, and then switched to 2 oz per day for weeks 5 - 8. This phase was double-blinded.
Washout Phase
NO INTERVENTIONPhase 2 (4 weeks): Both groups underwent a month-long "wash out" period, during which they did not ingest any of the Supplement or Placebo. This lasted from weeks 9-12. This phase was not double-blinded as all participants and the researchers were aware of the wash-out procedure.
Phase 3: Supplement
ACTIVE COMPARATORPhase 3 (8 weeks): Both groups took the Supplement at 3 oz per day as a loading dose for four weeks (weeks 13 - 16), and then 2 oz per day for the final four weeks (weeks 17 - 20). This phase was open labeled, as all participants and the researchers were aware that all participants were ingesting the Supplement.
Interventions
AuNP used in the study is an aqueous suspension of clean-surfaced, faceted gold nanoparticles that have extraordinary catalytic capabilities. AuNP were 8 - 28 nm in diameter, with varying shapes from bipyramids to polyhedrons. To avoid contamination, AuNP was suspended in ultra-pure water, and were not coated with any proteins or molecules to avoid negative reactions within living tissues. This resulted in a rose-pink color due to the incident light inducing a specific resonance known as the localized surface plasmon resonance. The AuNP supplement used in this study contains elemental gold at 6 ppm. Study dosage is 1 oz per day, which is about 0.17 mg elemental gold per day.
For the Placebo, water and red dye were mixed to create a placebo liquid with the same rose-pink shade as the AuNP supplement, along with flavoring that matched the AuNP supplement.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥ 18 and \<87 years of age
- Having arthritis
- Suffering from chronic knee pain
- Failed treatments to date - including surgery, Physical Therapy, NSAIDs
- Must agree to maintain the same eating, exercise, and sleep arrangements for the whole duration of the study
You may not qualify if:
- Having bacterial, intra-articular, or knee infections
- Had any knee related partial or complete total knee replacement within 3 months prior to the start of the study
- Had recent (3 months prior to start of the study) knee injection
- Currently on NSAIDs
- currently pregnant or lactating
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- 4Life Research, LLClead
- Professional Athletic Orthopedicscollaborator
- St. Louis Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Professional Athletic Orthopedics
St Louis, Missouri, 63122, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard C Lehman, MD
Professional Athletic Orthopedics
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Phase 1 was double-blinded, neither investigator nor participants know what products each participant was taking.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 14, 2022
First Posted
April 26, 2022
Study Start
August 3, 2020
Primary Completion
December 30, 2020
Study Completion
December 30, 2020
Last Updated
July 12, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share