NCT05342870

Brief Summary

Intravenous Regional Anesthesia (IVRA) is an easy and reliable anesthetic technique for hand and forearm surgery. Its use is however limited by the presence of tourniquet pain during the surgery and the absence of postoperative analgesia. Many adjuvants to local anesthetics have been studied in order to overcome these shortcomings, including α2 adrenergic agonists. Clonidine has been shown to be efficacious when used with IVRA at a dose of 1µg/kg. Dexmetedomidine (DEX) is a recent more selective α2 adrenergic agonist that has been used successfully during IVRA at a dose of 0.5µg/kg. However when comparing potency ratios of Clonidine and DEX (8 to 1), the investigators hypothesize that a lower DEX dose would provide patients with adequate anesthesia. We will determine the population average dose of DEX (ED50) that provides 50 minutes of tolerance to the tourniquet during a Lidocaine IVRA by a sequential Dixon up-down allocation study. Eligible patients will be enrolled after obtaining informed consent. Patients will receive a standardized IVRA with Lidocaine and DEX adjuvant following a sequential allocation scheme. The first patient will receive a dose of 0.5 µg/kg of DEX. The dose will be then adjusted in 0.1 µg/kg increments for the following patients dependent on the success of the previous patients block. If a patient experiences tourniquet pain prior to 50 minutes after inflation of the distal tourniquet the next patient will receive a higher dose, if he does not experience pain prior to 50 minutes after inflation of the distal tourniquet the dose for the following patient will be decreased. Recruitment will continue until 6 independent crossovers are observed with a minimum of 20 patients. The mean and the standard deviation of the ED50 of DEX will be calculated using the modified up-down method. This study will help determine the ED50 of DEX used as an adjuvant in IVRA. Based on the potency ratios of Clonidine vs. DEX, the investigators hypothesize that the dose of DEX needed to achieve 50 minutes of pain free tourniquet time will be closer to 0.125 µg/kg rather than 0.5 µg/kg, a 75% reduction in the dose studied.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
23

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2012

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2012

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2013

Completed
8.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 12, 2022

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 25, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 25, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

April 12, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 20, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Median effective dose of dexmedetomidine

    The dexmedetomidine dose for the first patient was 0.5 µg/kg, the minimum tourniquet time chosen for our study was 50 minutes. The dose was then adjusted in 0.1 µg/kg increments for the following patients depending on the success of the previous patient's block. If a patient experienced tourniquet pain prior to T0 + 50 minutes the next patient received a higher dose. If a patient did not experience pain at T0 + 50 minutes of tourniquet time the dose for the following patient was decreased. Stopping rules were set at 6 independent crossovers in the same direction (no pain to pain or pain to no pain), with a minimum number of 20 patients. The mean and standard deviation of the ED50 of dexmedetomidine were calculated using the modified up-and-down method, which uses the average dexmedetomidine dose of all independent pairs of patients involved a crossover to calculate the ED50

    During the procedure

Study Arms (1)

Dexmedetomidine

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Dexmedetomidine

Interventions

Following a sequential allocation scheme, the dexmedetomidine dose for each patient was determined by the Dixon up-and-down method. The dexmedetomidine dose for the first patient was 0.5 µg/kg. The dose was then adjusted in 0.1 µg/kg increments for the following patients depending on the success of the previous patient's block. If a patient experienced tourniquet pain prior to T0 + 50 minutes the next patient received a higher dose. If a patient did not experience pain at T0 + 50 minutes of tourniquet time the dose for the following patient was decreased. Identical syringes containing the solution mix were prepared by the principal investigator and handed to the blinded anesthesiologist in the room. Stopping rules were set at 6 independent crossovers in the same direction (no pain to pain or pain to no pain), with a minimum number of 20 patients

Dexmedetomidine

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients 18 to 70 years of age, ASA physical status I-II, undergoing unilateral hand or forearm surgery (that require 30 minutes or more) under IVRA.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with Raynaud's disease, sickle cell anemia, heart block, allergy to any of the anesthetic drugs used, patients on α-adrenergic agonists, ASA III or IV, emergency surgery and pregnant patients., Weight greater than 100Kg.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Karam C, Al Assadi S, Kanazi G, Zeeni C. A sequential allocation study to determine the ED50 of Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to lidocaine intravenous regional anesthesia. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 May 27;22(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01702-9.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Median Neuropathy

Interventions

Dexmedetomidine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

MononeuropathiesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking Details
This is one arm non-randomized approach. Since it is a sequential approach of medication administration, the anesthesiologist and patients were blinded to whatever dose was given.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2022

First Posted

April 25, 2022

Study Start

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion

August 1, 2013

Study Completion

August 1, 2013

Last Updated

April 25, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available because the publicity policy is not yet generated by our institutional review board but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.