Effect of Two Methods of Soft Tissue Augmentation for Socket Closure on Soft Tissue Landmarks and Ridge Dimensions
"Effect of Two Methods of Soft Tissue Augmentation for Socket Closure on Soft Tissue Landmarks and Ridge Dimensions- Results From Software-based Analysis of Clinical Data"
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To evaluate the effect of Connective Tissue Graft and Pediculated-Connective Tissue Graft for extraction socket closure on soft tissue landmarks and ridge dimensions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 22, 2022
CompletedApril 22, 2022
April 1, 2022
1.3 years
April 8, 2022
April 18, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
BL Gain
The displacement from the baseline to 6-months in BL dimensions was calculated and was described as BL gain.
Baseline to 6 months
Total displacement (TD)
The total displacement (TD) from the baseline to 6-months in MD dimensions was calculated and was described as TD gain.
Baseline to 6 months
Angle of Displacement (AOD)
The Angle of Displacement (AOD)) from the baseline to 6-months in MD dimensions was calculated and was described as AOD Change.
Baseline to 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Main treatment group
EXPERIMENTALsoft tissue closure of extraction sockets was done by pediculated connective tissue grafts (P-CTG)
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORsoft tissue closure of extraction sockets was done by connective tissue grafts (CTG)
Interventions
soft tissue closure of extraction sockets was done by pediculated connective tissue grafts (P-CTG)
soft tissue closure of extraction sockets was done by connective tissue grafts (CTG)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Based on the Extraction Defect Sounding(EDS) Classification given by Caplanis et al,
- Systemically healthy subjects within the age group of 20-50years
- with extraction defect type 2 and type 3 were included in this study
You may not qualify if:
- Medically compromised patients
- Subjects who underwent radiotherapy or chemotherapy and
- Smokers
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
SVS Institute of Dental Sciences
Hyderabad, Telangana, 509002, India
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bhagyasree Medisetty, MDS
SVS Institute of Dental Sciences
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Primary Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2022
First Posted
April 22, 2022
Study Start
January 1, 2018
Primary Completion
May 1, 2019
Study Completion
June 20, 2019
Last Updated
April 22, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share