Postoperative Return to Sexual Activity
PoRS
Randomized Controlled Trial of Standardized Counselling on Postoperative Return to Sexual Activity After Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
186
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To determine if standardized counselling regarding first sexual encounter after pelvic reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and / or urinary incontinence improves postoperative preparedness to return to sexual activity and sexual function.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 22, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 29, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 29, 2024
CompletedApril 2, 2025
December 1, 2024
1.9 years
March 30, 2022
March 28, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Preparedness to return to sexual activity
Preparedness for return to sexual activity will be measured by modifying the Patient Preparedness Questionnaire, Question #11: "Overall, I feel prepared for my upcoming surgery" to make it relevant to sexual activity following surgery. We will consider women prepared if they answer "strongly agree" on a 6-point Likert scale. The scale ranges from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree" to the modified statement: "Overall, I feel prepared for resuming sexual activity after my surgery".
2-6 months postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Sexual Function
2-6 months postoperative
Postoperative Pain
2-6 months postoperative
Time to Return to Sexual Function
2-6 months postoperative
Study Arms (2)
Standardized Counselling Tool
ACTIVE COMPARATORIf randomized to the treatment group, patients will be counselled using the structured counselling tool, and given a bulleted list of the counseling instrument to take home with them.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONRoutine postoperative counselling and care will be administered with no specific standardized counselling for return to sexual activity after surgery.
Interventions
Participants will be administered a Structured Counselling Tool that addresses the following themes: outside influences, conflicting emotions, uncertainty, sexual changes and stability, normalization, self-image
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult women (age ≥ 18 years)
- consented for pelvic reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and / or urinary incontinence
- currently sexually active as defined by self-report
- able to speak and read English
You may not qualify if:
- Not currently sexually active as defined by self-report
- vulvar dermatologic pathology (Lichen sclerosus, lichen planus)
- chronic pelvic pain
- unable to consent or complete outcomes due to mental incapacity, prisoners or incarcerated women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Calgarylead
- University of Wisconsin, Madisoncollaborator
- Albany Medical Collegecollaborator
- Penn State Universitycollaborator
- Columbia Universitycollaborator
- University of Chicagocollaborator
- University of Floridacollaborator
- WellSpan Healthcollaborator
- University of New Mexicocollaborator
- Weill Medical College of Cornell Universitycollaborator
- University of Texas at Austincollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Alberta Health Services, University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T3L 0C9, Canada
Related Publications (8)
Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svardsudd KF. Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Feb;180(2 Pt 1):299-305. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70203-6.
PMID: 9988790BACKGROUNDOlsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr;89(4):501-6. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6.
PMID: 9083302BACKGROUNDSmith FJ, Holman CD, Moorin RE, Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;116(5):1096-100. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f73729.
PMID: 20966694BACKGROUNDDunivan GC, McGuire BL, Rishel Brakey HA, Komesu YM, Rogers RG, Sussman AL. A longitudinal qualitative evaluation of patient perspectives of adverse events after pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Dec;30(12):2023-2028. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03998-7. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
PMID: 31187179BACKGROUNDAntosh DD, Kim-Fine S, Meriwether KV, Kanter G, Dieter AA, Mamik MM, Good M, Singh R, Alas A, Foda MA, Balk EM, Rahn DD, Rogers RG. Changes in Sexual Activity and Function After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A Systematic Review. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;136(5):922-931. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004125.
PMID: 33030874BACKGROUNDKenton K, Pham T, Mueller E, Brubaker L. Patient preparedness: an important predictor of surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;197(6):654.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.059.
PMID: 18060968BACKGROUNDKim-Fine S, Caldwell L, Long J, Meriwether KV, Iyer S, Heisler CA, Hudson P, Husk K, Lozo S, Demtchouk V, Huang B, Antosh DD, Rogers RG; Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Consortium of Research in Pelvic Surgery. Intervention Counseling for Return to Sex After Urogynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Nov 1;146(5):701-709. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006064. Epub 2025 Sep 11.
PMID: 40934518DERIVEDCaldwell L, Kim-Fine S, Antosh DD, Husk K, Meriwether KV, Long JB, Heisler CA, Hudson PL, Lozo S, Iyer S, Weber LeBrun EE, Rogers RG. Standardized Counseling Tool for Returning to Sexual Activity After Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Nov 1;146(5):e80-e84. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005938. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
PMID: 40505118DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shunaha Kim-Fine, MD
University of Calgary
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2022
First Posted
April 22, 2022
Study Start
April 5, 2022
Primary Completion
February 29, 2024
Study Completion
February 29, 2024
Last Updated
April 2, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No identifiers will be shared among co-investigators or other researchers. This is because the information is stored in Redcap and site PIs and their research staff will only have access to IPDs in their own institution but not across outside institutions.