NCT05340595

Brief Summary

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of self-etch primer (SEP) application on the bond failure rate of a mandibular bonded lingual retainer over 24 months. Materials and Methods: After the removal of the orthodontic appliances, the lingual retainers, which were made of six-stranded stainless steel wire 0.0215 inches in diameter, wiil bent and bond onto the lingual surface of all mandibular anterior teeth. The study will performed using a split-mouth design. In the study group, the SEP will be administired to the teeth's lingual surfaces. In the control group, they will etch using 37% phosphoric etchant liquid gel. After etching, the primer wiil be applied. The adhesive resin was applied and the lingual retainer was fitted. The patients will be re-valuated over 24 months. The first bond failures and the amount of adhesive remaining on the tooth will be recorded as the adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores. The chi-square test will be used to compare the bond failure rates and ARI scores between the groups. The survival rates of the retainers will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier test. The significance level will P \< 0.05.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
26

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2014

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 2, 2014

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 2, 2015

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 23, 2016

Completed
5.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 7, 2022

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 22, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 28, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

April 7, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 21, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Bond Failure Rate of a Mandibular Bonded Lingual Retainer

    Bond Failure Rate of a Mandibular Bonded Lingual Retainer

    24 months

Study Arms (2)

Control group

OTHER

The primer (Transbond XT Primer; 3M Unitek, California) was applied in a thin and uniform coat. Then the adhesive resin (Transbond LR Light Cure Adhesive Paste; 3M Unitek, California) was administered to the lingual surface of the anterior teeth and the lingual retainer was placed in position. The adhesive resin was polymerized from two directions for a total of 20 s using a visible-light curing unit (Hilux 200, Benlioglu Dental Inc., Ankara, Turkey) with an output power of 600 mW/cm2.

Other: Orthodontic retainer bonding

Study group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In the study group, the SEP (3M Unitek, Monrovia, California) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions, namely it was administered to the lingual surfaces of the teeth and rubbed for 3 s. Then a gentle burst of dry air was delivered to thin the primer. In the control group, the lingual surfaces of the teeth were etched using 37% phosphoric etchant liquid gel (3M Espe, St Paul, Minnesota, USA) for 30 s, followed by rinsing and drying.

Other: Orthodontic retainer bonding

Interventions

Self-etch primer (Transbond XT Primer; 3M Unitek, California) was administered to the teeth's lingual surfaces.

Control groupStudy group

Eligibility Criteria

Age11 Years - 34 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Individuals who will continue to the retention phase after fixed orthodontic treatment,
  • Presence of all mandibular incisor and canine teeth,
  • Good oral hygiene,
  • No caries,
  • No fractures,
  • Healthy periodontal condition,
  • No restorations,
  • No previous bonded retainer,
  • No traumatic parafunctional habits such as bruxism.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (2)

  • Elekdag-Turk S, Isci D, Turk T, Cakmak F. Six-month bracket failure rate evaluation of a self-etching primer. Eur J Orthod. 2008 Apr;30(2):211-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm119. Epub 2008 Jan 23.

    PMID: 18216373BACKGROUND
  • Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Scribante A, De Angelis M, Klersy C. Effect of blood contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Mar;125(3):357-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.09.022.

    PMID: 15014415BACKGROUND

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2022

First Posted

April 22, 2022

Study Start

March 2, 2014

Primary Completion

November 2, 2015

Study Completion

July 23, 2016

Last Updated

April 28, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04