Effect of Primer Application on the Lingual Retainer
Effect of Self-Etch Primer Application on the Bond Failure Rate of a Mandibular Bonded Lingual Retainer
1 other identifier
interventional
26
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Background: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of self-etch primer (SEP) application on the bond failure rate of a mandibular bonded lingual retainer over 24 months. Materials and Methods: After the removal of the orthodontic appliances, the lingual retainers, which were made of six-stranded stainless steel wire 0.0215 inches in diameter, wiil bent and bond onto the lingual surface of all mandibular anterior teeth. The study will performed using a split-mouth design. In the study group, the SEP will be administired to the teeth's lingual surfaces. In the control group, they will etch using 37% phosphoric etchant liquid gel. After etching, the primer wiil be applied. The adhesive resin was applied and the lingual retainer was fitted. The patients will be re-valuated over 24 months. The first bond failures and the amount of adhesive remaining on the tooth will be recorded as the adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores. The chi-square test will be used to compare the bond failure rates and ARI scores between the groups. The survival rates of the retainers will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier test. The significance level will P \< 0.05.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 2, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 2, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 23, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 7, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 22, 2022
CompletedApril 28, 2022
April 1, 2022
1.7 years
April 7, 2022
April 21, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bond Failure Rate of a Mandibular Bonded Lingual Retainer
Bond Failure Rate of a Mandibular Bonded Lingual Retainer
24 months
Study Arms (2)
Control group
OTHERThe primer (Transbond XT Primer; 3M Unitek, California) was applied in a thin and uniform coat. Then the adhesive resin (Transbond LR Light Cure Adhesive Paste; 3M Unitek, California) was administered to the lingual surface of the anterior teeth and the lingual retainer was placed in position. The adhesive resin was polymerized from two directions for a total of 20 s using a visible-light curing unit (Hilux 200, Benlioglu Dental Inc., Ankara, Turkey) with an output power of 600 mW/cm2.
Study group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the study group, the SEP (3M Unitek, Monrovia, California) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions, namely it was administered to the lingual surfaces of the teeth and rubbed for 3 s. Then a gentle burst of dry air was delivered to thin the primer. In the control group, the lingual surfaces of the teeth were etched using 37% phosphoric etchant liquid gel (3M Espe, St Paul, Minnesota, USA) for 30 s, followed by rinsing and drying.
Interventions
Self-etch primer (Transbond XT Primer; 3M Unitek, California) was administered to the teeth's lingual surfaces.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals who will continue to the retention phase after fixed orthodontic treatment,
- Presence of all mandibular incisor and canine teeth,
- Good oral hygiene,
- No caries,
- No fractures,
- Healthy periodontal condition,
- No restorations,
- No previous bonded retainer,
- No traumatic parafunctional habits such as bruxism.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ondokuz Mayıs Universitylead
- Sabahat Yazıcıoğlucollaborator
Related Publications (2)
Elekdag-Turk S, Isci D, Turk T, Cakmak F. Six-month bracket failure rate evaluation of a self-etching primer. Eur J Orthod. 2008 Apr;30(2):211-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm119. Epub 2008 Jan 23.
PMID: 18216373BACKGROUNDSfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Scribante A, De Angelis M, Klersy C. Effect of blood contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Mar;125(3):357-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.09.022.
PMID: 15014415BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 7, 2022
First Posted
April 22, 2022
Study Start
March 2, 2014
Primary Completion
November 2, 2015
Study Completion
July 23, 2016
Last Updated
April 28, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04