Non Invasive Measurement With Trans Cranial Doppler Versus Invasive Measurement in Pediatric Age
nICPped
The Accuracy of Intracranial Pressure Non Invasive Measurement With Trans Cranial Doppler Versus Invasive Measurement in Pediatric Age
1 other identifier
observational
46
1 country
6
Brief Summary
An increase of intracranial pressure (ICP) is an important cause of secondary brain damage. The gold standard for measuring ICP is represented by invasive positioning of intracranial ICP devices. The most used non-invasive methods (nICP) are obtained through bed-side ultrasound, routinely used in the management of children in Pediatric Intensive Care: arterial Trancranial Doppler (TCD) and ultrasound measurement of the diameter of the optic nerve sheath (ONSD ). In this study it is proposed to compare the measurement of nICP obtained by TCD and ONSD versus the measurement obtained by the invasive monitoring (iICP) already present.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2022
Typical duration for all trials
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 31, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedJanuary 28, 2025
January 1, 2025
3 years
March 31, 2022
January 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
comparison between ICP and nICP (measured by TCD)
For each patient with invasive ICP, the nICP (measured by TCD) will be compared. We will collect ICP and nICP in pairs for each measurement ( T1 ) using the same unit of measurement. (During 48 hours we will collect ICP and nICP in pairs 4 times: T1 T2 T3 T4. We will finally evaluate the data in pairs in the total sample).
within 48 hours after the invasive ICP placement
comparison between ICP and nICP (measured by TCD)
For each patient with invasive ICP, the nICP (measured by TCD) will be compared. We will collect ICP and nICP in pairs for each measurement ( T2 ) using the same unit of measurement. (During 48 hours we will collect ICP and nICP in pairs 4 times: T1 T2 T3 T4. We will finally evaluate the data in pairs in the total sample).
within 48 hours after the invasive ICP placement
comparison between ICP and nICP (measured by TCD)
For each patient with invasive ICP, the nICP (measured by TCD) will be compared. We will collect ICP and nICP in pairs for each measurement ( T3 ) using the same unit of measurement. (During 48 hours we will collect ICP and nICP in pairs 4 times: T1 T2 T3 T4. We will finally evaluate the data in pairs in the total sample).
within 48 hours after the invasive ICP placement
comparison between ICP and nICP (measured by TCD)
For each patient with invasive ICP, the nICP (measured by TCD) will be compared. We will collect ICP and nICP in pairs for each measurement ( T4 ) using the same unit of measurement. (During 48 hours we will collect ICP and nICP in pairs 4 times: T1 T2 T3 T4. We will finally evaluate the data in pairs in the total sample).
within 48 hours after the invasive ICP placement
Secondary Outcomes (3)
comparison between ICP and nICP (measured by ONSD)
within 48 hours after the invasive ICP placement
interrater reliability for TCD measurement
within 48 hours after the invasive ICP placement
interrater reliability for ONSD measurement
within 48 hours after the invasive ICP placement
Study Arms (1)
pediatric patients with ICP device
In children requiring ICP, TCD and ONSD will be measured: * within 30 minutes before to the placement of the ICP (if possiblel) * at least twice a day after placement of the invasive ICP for the first 48 hours Each measurement will include: * The measure of the invasive ICP * Calculation of invasive CPP (invasive MAP-invasive ICP) * TCD: FVs, FVd, FVm, from which the nCPP will be obtained with the formula FVdICP. The nICP will be obtained from invasive MAP minus nCPP. * The measurement of the nICP ONSD (2) for a total of 2 measurements preferably from the side where the invasive ICP device is positioned. Measurements (TCD and ONSD) will be done by two operators blinded by each other in order to evaluate the inter-operator variability
Interventions
TCD and ONSD sonography twice a day per 2 days
Eligibility Criteria
pediatric patients with planned invasive ICP admitted to PICU
You may qualify if:
- invasive ICP placement
You may not qualify if:
- cranial base fracture
- absent informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
PICU IRCSS Sant'Orsola Malpighi
Bologna, Italy
PICU Spedali Civili BRescia
Brescia, Italy
PICU Ospedale Mayer
Florence, Italy
PICU Ospedale Gaslini
Genova, Italy
PICU University Hospital Padova
Padua, 35128, Italy
PICU Università Cattolica
Roma, Italy
Related Publications (6)
Czosnyka M, Pickard JD. Monitoring and interpretation of intracranial pressure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;75(6):813-21. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.033126.
PMID: 15145991RESULTKochanek PM, Tasker RC, Carney N, Totten AM, Adelson PD, Selden NR, Davis-O'Reilly C, Hart EL, Bell MJ, Bratton SL, Grant GA, Kissoon N, Reuter-Rice KE, Vavilala MS, Wainwright MS. Guidelines for the Management of Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Third Edition: Update of the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines, Executive Summary. Neurosurgery. 2019 Jun 1;84(6):1169-1178. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz051.
PMID: 30822776RESULTAnderson RC, Kan P, Klimo P, Brockmeyer DL, Walker ML, Kestle JR. Complications of intracranial pressure monitoring in children with head trauma. J Neurosurg. 2004 Aug;101(1 Suppl):53-8. doi: 10.3171/ped.2004.101.2.0053.
PMID: 16206972RESULTSchmidt EA, Czosnyka M, Gooskens I, Piechnik SK, Matta BF, Whitfield PC, Pickard JD. Preliminary experience of the estimation of cerebral perfusion pressure using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;70(2):198-204. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.70.2.198.
PMID: 11160468RESULTMalayeri AA, Bavarian S, Mehdizadeh M. Sonographic evaluation of optic nerve diameter in children with raised intracranial pressure. J Ultrasound Med. 2005 Feb;24(2):143-7. doi: 10.7863/jum.2005.24.2.143.
PMID: 15661943RESULTO'Brien NF, Reuter-Rice K, Wainwright MS, Kaplan SL, Appavu B, Erklauer JC, Ghosh S, Kirschen M, Kozak B, Lidsky K, Lovett ME, Mehollin-Ray AR, Miles DK, Press CA, Simon DW, Tasker RC, LaRovere KL. Practice Recommendations for Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography in Critically Ill Children in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus Statement. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2021 Jun;10(2):133-142. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715128. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
PMID: 33884214RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
angela amigoni, MD
University Hospital of Padova
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 31, 2022
First Posted
April 21, 2022
Study Start
July 1, 2022
Primary Completion
June 30, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
January 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01