NCT05337696

Brief Summary

The RECONSTRUCT study is a multi-center, prospective, single arm, post-market, pilot study to evaluate clinical and radiologic outcome data regarding the use of the Vertebral Implant PEEK (VIP) implant in the treatment of symptomatic, acute (\<8week) vertebral compression fractures who have failed conservative care strategies.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 26, 2022

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 20, 2022

Completed
20 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 10, 2022

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 7, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 7, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 8, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

March 26, 2022

Last Update Submit

July 2, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of adverse events

    Safety will be measured by number of device related serious adverse events using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0

    End of study at 18 months

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Procedure duration

    Day 1, at end of procedure

  • Volume of cement injected

    Day 1, at end of procedure

  • Cement leakage

    Day 1, at end of procedure

  • Fluoroscopy time

    Day 1, at end of procedure

  • Fluoroscopy dose

    Day 1, at end of procedure

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Participants with vertebral compression fractures

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants with vertebral compression fractures who have failed conservative care strategies.

Procedure: Vertebral Implant PEEK ProcedureDevice: Vertebral Implant PEEK (VIP) implant

Interventions

Vertebral Implant PEEK (VIP) procedure is a minimally invasive/percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA), image guided procedure. Two VIP devices are implanted in each to be treated vertebra. A cavity is drilled allowing the introduction of the implant posteriorly through the pedicle and the vertebral body upto the anterior wall. A part of the implant is embedded into the pedicle, thus providing posterior support. The other part of the device, located in the vertebral body, presents a central canula and lateral perforations, which allow acrylic bone cement diffusion, filling of the vertebral body, filling and fixing the implant, and supporting of the upper endplate. The combination of the implant and the cement allows the treatment of vertebral fractures.

Also known as: Vertebral Implant, VIP
Participants with vertebral compression fractures

The study device is V-STRUT© Vertebral Implant manufactured by Hyprevention (VIP -Vertebral Implant PEEK), FDA cleared under K191709, indicated for use in the treatment of vertebral fractures in the thoracic and lumbar spine from T9 to L5. It is intended to be used in combination with PMMA bone cement.

Also known as: V-STRUT©
Participants with vertebral compression fractures

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 50
  • Osteoporotic compression fractures of the thoracolumbar spine (T1 -L5)
  • Up to three levels can be fractured and treated, but at least one of the three need to be treated with V-STRUT; the level(s) to be treated with study device is at the discretion of the enrolling investigator
  • Fracture age of ≤ 12 weeks as indicated by onset of pain or known antecedent traumatic event with corresponding evidence of acuity on MRI (T1 and STIR sequences) or radioisotope bone scan
  • ODI ≥ 30/100 at screening visit and VAS ≥ 60 at screening visit
  • Failure of conservative management strategies for compression fractures resulting in inadequately controlled pain and/or patient immobility
  • Patient has failed non-operative medical therapy as defined by one of the following definitions set forth by the American College of Radiology:
  • For a patient rendered nonambulatory as a result of pain from a VCF, pain persisting at a level that prevents ambulation despite 24 hours of analgesic therapy; or
  • For a patient with sufficient pain from a VCF such that physical therapy is intolerable, pain persisting at that level despite 24 hours of analgesic therapy; or
  • For a patient with pain from a VCF, unacceptable side effects such as excessive sedation, confusion, or constipation as a result of the analgesic therapy necessary to reduce pain to a tolerable level.
  • Magerl classification A1.1, A1.2, A1.3, A2.1, A2.2 and A3.1 type fractures: pediculosomatic junction fractures and other fractures involving vertebral pedicles
  • Appropriate pedicle diameter to receive 4.5mm, 5.5mm diameter or 6.5mm diameter implants
  • ASA \< 4

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient clearly improving on conservative treatment
  • Any contra-indication or allergy to implant material or cement
  • Systemic infection or infection located in the spine
  • Any medical condition including but not limited to anemia, coagulation disorders, fibromyalgia, algoneurodystrophy, Paget's disease, uncontrolled diabetes that would preclude the patient from having surgery or would impede the benefit of surgery
  • Neurologic signs or symptoms related to the fracture or the impeding pathological fracture
  • Any previous surgical treatment (material or cement) in the targeted vertebra
  • Less than one third of the original vertebral body height remaining
  • Unstable fractures or neoplasms with posterior involvement
  • Damages of the posterior wall
  • Sclerotic cancellous bone
  • Pedicles not large enough to accept V-STRUT© instrumentation and implants
  • Pregnancy(women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test to participate)
  • Pre-existing or clinically unstable neurologic deficit
  • Spinal canal compromise causing clinical manifestations of cord, neural foramen, or nerve root compression at the level to be treated
  • Any physical exam evidence of myelopathy or radiculopathy
  • +10 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Johns Hopkins

Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States

Location

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

New York, New York, 10029, United States

Location

St. Luke's

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015, United States

Location

West Virginia

Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Mutagenesis, Insertional

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Protein EngineeringGenetic EngineeringGenetic TechniquesInvestigative TechniquesMutationGenetic VariationGenetic PhenomenaMutagenesis

Study Officials

  • Tomoyoshi Shigematsu, MD

    Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor, Neurosurgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2022

First Posted

April 20, 2022

Study Start

May 10, 2022

Primary Completion

March 7, 2025

Study Completion

March 7, 2025

Last Updated

July 8, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Upon the completion of the study, Mount Sinai's data management team will clean and analysis all data in preparation of manuscript writing and publication. The intention will be to publish together between the principal investigator and the sponsor. Following publication, Mount Sinai will archive and store all associated data on it's cloud-based system

Locations