NCT05336357

Brief Summary

Circulatory shock occurs when the oxygen supply to the tissues decreases, leading to cellular damage and affecting about one-third of patients admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICUs). Cardiac Output (CO) is defined as the volume of blood ejected by the left ventricle per minute and is a crucial hemodynamic parameter for monitoring patients with signs of circulatory shock. However, this parameter is underutilized in patients treated in Emergency Units because its measurement typically involves invasive methods, which are not commonly available in this setting. Any method capable of measuring CO without the need for pulmonary artery catheter insertion is referred to as minimally invasive CO monitoring. Evaluating these parameters allows for a quicker determination of the etiology of circulatory shock, enabling the early initiation of goal-directed therapy. Goal-directed therapy has been proven effective in reducing morbidity and mortality, ICU length of stay, and mechanical ventilation duration in ICU patients who respond to fluid resuscitation. Currently, there are no data on the impact of a hemodynamic optimization strategy in patients during the early hours of shock. The objective is to assess whether goal-directed hemodynamic therapy, through non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring, reduces the time required for hemodynamic resuscitation in patients with septic shock. A multicenter, randomized, open-label study will be conducted in Emergency Units, Intensive Care Units, and Hospital Wards. Patients over 18 years old admitted with signs of septic shock (defined as systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg and/or mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg, along with at least one of the following criteria: lactate greater than 2 mEq/L, oliguria, neurological alteration, or capillary refill time greater than 3 seconds) will be included Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups. In the Goal-Directed Therapy Group, patients will be monitored using the HemoSphere HPI™ (Edwards Life Sciences, Irvine, CA, USA), where parameters such as cardiac index (CI), stroke volume (SV), systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and HPI will guide medical management. In the Conventional Therapy Group, patients will be evaluated with the standard hemodynamic monitoring equipment typically found in emergency units..

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
380

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
6mo left

Started Feb 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress82%
Feb 2024Oct 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 17, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 20, 2022

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 20, 2024

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 22, 2026

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 30, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

August 26, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

March 17, 2022

Last Update Submit

August 22, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

ShockSepsisEarly Goal Directed Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time to Resuscitation after 6 hours of treatment

    Time to Resuscitation: After 6 hours of treatment, the number of patients who achieve the following goals: Mean arterial pressure \> 65mmHg Urine output greater than 0.5 mL/kg/h for more than 2 hours, and/or Decrease of more than 10% in serum lactate compared to the initial value

    6 hours

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Number of Participants with Myocardial Injury

    30 days

  • Number of Participants with Acute Myocardial Infarction

    30 days

  • Patients with Acute Kidney Injury

    72 hours

  • Assessment of health costs

    1 year

  • Length of hospital stay

    180 days

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Goal-Directed Therapy Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients allocated to the Goal-Directed Therapy group will be monitored by the ClearSight™ System (Edwards Life Sciences, Irvine, CA, USA) in the first 24 hours after randomization, where the parameters Cardiac Index (CI), Stroke Volume (SV), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) will be acquired continuously.

Device: Goal-Directed Therapy

Conventional Therapy Group

NO INTERVENTION

Patients allocated to the Conventional Therapy Group will be treated according to the assistant team of the Emergency Unit, where will be measured the following parameters: invasive or non-invasive blood pressure (decided by the assistant team), peripheral oximetry, heart and respiratory rate, urinary output, in association with clinical history, complete physical examination and laboratory and imaging tests.

Interventions

Patients will be monitored by the ClearSight™ System (Edwards Life Sciences, Irvine, CA, USA) in the first 24 hours, where the parameters Cardiac Index (CI), Stroke Volume (SV), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) will be acquired continuously. The treatment goal will be to keep the CI greater than or equal to 2.2 L/min/m2, the SV greater than or equal to 35 mL/beat, and the SBP greater than or equal to 90 mmHg and/or the MAP greater than or equal to 65 mmHg. If the CI is below 2.2 L/min/m2 and the SV less than 35 mL/beat, an aliquot of 500 mL of crystalloid solution will be administered; if there is not an increase by 10% in the CI and SV values, a new aliquot of 250 mL may be administered; if this 10% increase does not occur for at least 20 minutes, inotropic medications will be started, with doses titrated periodically. If the pre-established goal is not reached, it is suggested to consider transfusion of a concentrated red blood cell.

Also known as: ClearSight™ System
Goal-Directed Therapy Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age \> 18 years;
  • Patients admitted to Emergency Units, Intensive Care Units, and Wards within 3 hours of the diagnosis of Septic Shock:
  • Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) \< 90 mmHg and/or Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) \< 65 mmHg (with or without norepinephrine at a dose less than 0.5 mcg/kg/min) + Clinical signs of infection and at least one of the following:
  • Lactate \> 2 mEq/L;
  • Oliguria (urine output \< 0.5 mL/kg/h for at least 6 hours);
  • Neurological changes (mental confusion, decreased level of consciousness, psychomotor agitation, temporal-spatial disorientation);
  • Capillary refill time \> 3 s (after digital compression for 10 seconds);
  • Poor skin perfusion.
  • Signed Informed Consent Form.

You may not qualify if:

  • Hospital admission time greater than 24 hours
  • Significant edema in the fingers
  • Severe peripheral vasoconstriction
  • Use of Norepinephrine at a dose greater than or equal to 0.5 mcg/kg/min
  • Presence of significant Aortic Insufficiency
  • Patients undergoing Renal Replacement Therapy
  • Patients with ST-segment elevation Myocardial Infarction
  • Patients requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
  • Patients already participating in another study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Instituto do Coração

São Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil

RECRUITING

Related Publications (23)

  • Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R, Bakker J, Hofer C, Jaeschke R, Mebazaa A, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL, Vincent JL, Rhodes A. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Dec;40(12):1795-815. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z. Epub 2014 Nov 13.

    PMID: 25392034BACKGROUND
  • Gonzalez-Hermosillo JA, Palma-Carbajal R, Rojas-Velasco G, Cabrera-Jardines R, Gonzalez-Galvan LM, Manzur-Sandoval D, Jimenez-Rodriguez GM, Ortiz-Solis WA. Hemodynamic profiles related to circulatory shock in cardiac care units. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2020;90(1):47-54. doi: 10.24875/ACM.19000016.

    PMID: 31996854BACKGROUND
  • Sakr Y, Reinhart K, Vincent JL, Sprung CL, Moreno R, Ranieri VM, De Backer D, Payen D. Does dopamine administration in shock influence outcome? Results of the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) Study. Crit Care Med. 2006 Mar;34(3):589-97. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000201896.45809.E3.

    PMID: 16505643BACKGROUND
  • Vincent JL. Understanding cardiac output. Crit Care. 2008;12(4):174. doi: 10.1186/cc6975. Epub 2008 Aug 22.

    PMID: 18771592BACKGROUND
  • Kislitsina ON, Rich JD, Wilcox JE, Pham DT, Churyla A, Vorovich EB, Ghafourian K, Yancy CW. Shock - Classification and Pathophysiological Principles of Therapeutics. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2019;15(2):102-113. doi: 10.2174/1573403X15666181212125024.

    PMID: 30543176BACKGROUND
  • Swan HJ, Ganz W, Forrester J, Marcus H, Diamond G, Chonette D. Catheterization of the heart in man with use of a flow-directed balloon-tipped catheter. N Engl J Med. 1970 Aug 27;283(9):447-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197008272830902. No abstract available.

    PMID: 5434111BACKGROUND
  • Auler JO Jr, Galas FR, Sundin MR, Hajjar LA. Auler JO Jr, Galas FR, Sundin MR, Hajjar LA: Arterial pulse pressure variation predicting fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Shock 30(Suppl 1):18-22, 2008. Shock. 2009 May;31(5):542. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181a2e492. No abstract available.

    PMID: 19365234BACKGROUND
  • Sangkum L, Liu GL, Yu L, Yan H, Kaye AD, Liu H. Minimally invasive or noninvasive cardiac output measurement: an update. J Anesth. 2016 Jun;30(3):461-80. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2154-9. Epub 2016 Mar 9.

    PMID: 26961819BACKGROUND
  • De Backer D, Bakker J, Cecconi M, Hajjar L, Liu DW, Lobo S, Monnet X, Morelli A, Myatra SN, Perel A, Pinsky MR, Saugel B, Teboul JL, Vieillard-Baron A, Vincent JL. Alternatives to the Swan-Ganz catheter. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jun;44(6):730-741. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5187-8. Epub 2018 May 3.

    PMID: 29725695BACKGROUND
  • Teboul JL, Saugel B, Cecconi M, De Backer D, Hofer CK, Monnet X, Perel A, Pinsky MR, Reuter DA, Rhodes A, Squara P, Vincent JL, Scheeren TW. Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Sep;42(9):1350-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4375-7. Epub 2016 May 7.

    PMID: 27155605BACKGROUND
  • Kobe J, Mishra N, Arya VK, Al-Moustadi W, Nates W, Kumar B. Cardiac output monitoring: Technology and choice. Ann Card Anaesth. 2019 Jan-Mar;22(1):6-17. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_41_18.

    PMID: 30648673BACKGROUND
  • Broch O, Renner J, Gruenewald M, Meybohm P, Schottler J, Caliebe A, Steinfath M, Malbrain M, Bein B. A comparison of the Nexfin(R) and transcardiopulmonary thermodilution to estimate cardiac output during coronary artery surgery. Anaesthesia. 2012 Apr;67(4):377-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.07018.x. Epub 2012 Feb 11.

    PMID: 22324797BACKGROUND
  • Bubenek-Turconi SI, Craciun M, Miclea I, Perel A. Noninvasive continuous cardiac output by the Nexfin before and after preload-modifying maneuvers: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2013 Aug;117(2):366-72. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829562c3. Epub 2013 Jun 11.

    PMID: 23757471BACKGROUND
  • Sokolski M, Rydlewska A, Krakowiak B, Biegus J, Zymlinski R, Banasiak W, Jankowska EA, Ponikowski P. Comparison of invasive and non-invasive measurements of haemodynamic parameters in patients with advanced heart failure. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2011 Nov;12(11):773-8. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32834cfebb.

    PMID: 21941196BACKGROUND
  • Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jun;112(6):1392-402. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181eeaae5. Epub 2010 Oct 21.

    PMID: 20966436BACKGROUND
  • Geisen M, Rhodes A, Cecconi M. Less-invasive approaches to perioperative haemodynamic optimization. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2012 Aug;18(4):377-84. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328355894f.

    PMID: 22732438BACKGROUND
  • Giglio M, Manca F, Dalfino L, Brienza N. Perioperative hemodynamic goal-directed therapy and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Nov;82(11):1199-1213. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

    PMID: 27075210BACKGROUND
  • Pearse RM, Harrison DA, MacDonald N, Gillies MA, Blunt M, Ackland G, Grocott MP, Ahern A, Griggs K, Scott R, Hinds C, Rowan K; OPTIMISE Study Group. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA. 2014 Jun 4;311(21):2181-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.5305.

    PMID: 24842135BACKGROUND
  • Kapoor PM, Kakani M, Chowdhury U, Choudhury M, Lakshmy, Kiran U. Early goal-directed therapy in moderate to high-risk cardiac surgery patients. Ann Card Anaesth. 2008 Jan-Jun;11(1):27-34. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.38446.

    PMID: 18182756BACKGROUND
  • Osawa EA, Rhodes A, Landoni G, Galas FR, Fukushima JT, Park CH, Almeida JP, Nakamura RE, Strabelli TM, Pileggi B, Leme AC, Fominskiy E, Sakr Y, Lima M, Franco RA, Chan RP, Piccioni MA, Mendes P, Menezes SR, Bruno T, Gaiotto FA, Lisboa LA, Dallan LA, Hueb AC, Pomerantzeff PM, Kalil Filho R, Jatene FB, Auler Junior JO, Hajjar LA. Effect of Perioperative Goal-Directed Hemodynamic Resuscitation Therapy on Outcomes Following Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Systematic Review. Crit Care Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):724-33. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001479.

    PMID: 26646462BACKGROUND
  • Aya HD, Cecconi M, Hamilton M, Rhodes A. Goal-directed therapy in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Apr;110(4):510-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet020. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

    PMID: 23447502BACKGROUND
  • Nowak RM, Nanayakkara P, DiSomma S, Levy P, Schrijver E, Huyghe R, Autunno A, Sherwin RL, Divine G, Moyer M. Noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in emergency patients with suspected heart failure, sepsis and stroke: the PREMIUM registry. West J Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;15(7):786-94. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.8.21357. Epub 2014 Sep 23.

    PMID: 25493119BACKGROUND
  • McGregor D, Sharma S, Gupta S, Ahmad S, Godec T, Harris T. Emergency department non-invasive cardiac output study (EDNICO): a feasibility and repeatability study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Mar 11;27(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0586-6.

    PMID: 30867006BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

ShockSepsis

Interventions

Early Goal-Directed Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsInfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammation

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Critical CarePatient CareTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Ludhmila A Hajjar, MD, PhD

    University of Sao Paulo

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Ludhmila A Hajjar, MD, PhD

CONTACT

ARO F InCor, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2022

First Posted

April 20, 2022

Study Start

February 20, 2024

Primary Completion

February 22, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2026

Last Updated

August 26, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations