NCT05333263

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy with which a microprocessor-controlled treadmill delivers controlled postural disturbances.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
12

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable healthy

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable healthy

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 11, 2022

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 18, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 17, 2022

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 17, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 17, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 23, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 23, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

April 11, 2022

Results QC Date

December 5, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 19, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Estimate the Limits of Agreement Between Observed and Commanded Treadmill Belt Disturbance Parameters: Belt Displacement.

    Treadmill belt displacement (cm) will be measured with a Motion Capture system for each perturbation trial and compared to the commanded magnitude to assess system accuracy. Mean observed treadmill belt displacement, in centimeters, relative to commended treadmill belt displacement was calculated and the mean relative error (percentage) was reported. Percent Error = (Commanded Kinematic Value - Observed Kinematic Value)/Commanded Kinematic Value \*100%. The mean value is then determined from the individual errors for each participant. This results in Mean Relative Error. Lower numbers are considered a better outcome (less error). A negative percentage indicates that the observed value is larger than the command value.

    Duration of participant test session (approximately 2 hours)

  • Estimate the Limits of Agreement Between Observed and Commanded Treadmill Belt Disturbance Parameters: Peak Velocity.

    Treadmill belt peak velocity (cm/s) will be measured with a Motion Capture system for each perturbation trial and compared to the commanded magnitude to assess system accuracy. Mean observed treadmill belt peak velocity, in centimeters/second, relative to commended treadmill belt peak velocity was calculated and the mean relative error (percentage) was reported. Percent Error = (Commanded Kinematic Value - Observed Kinematic Value)/Commanded Kinematic Value \*100%. The mean value is then determined from the individual errors for each participant. This results in Mean Relative Error. Lower numbers are considered a better outcome (less error). A negative percentage indicates that the observed value is larger than the command value.

    Duration of participant test session (approximately 2 hours)

  • Estimate the Limits of Agreement Between Observed and Commanded Treadmill Belt Disturbance Parameters: Average Initial Acceleration.

    Treadmill belt average initial acceleration (cm/s/s) will be measured with a Motion Capture system for each perturbation trial and compared to the commanded magnitude to assess system accuracy. Mean observed treadmill belt average initial acceleration, in centimeters/second/second, relative to commended treadmill belt average initial acceleration was calculated and the mean relative error (percentage) was reported. Percent Error = (Commanded Kinematic Value - Observed Kinematic Value)/Commanded Kinematic Value \*100%. The mean value is then determined from the individual errors for each participant. This results in Mean Relative Error. Lower numbers are considered a better outcome (less error). A negative percentage indicates that the observed value is larger than the command value.

    Duration of participant test session (approximately 2 hours)

Study Arms (3)

ABB Motor

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects will undergo a balance assessment using the following program on the treadmill: 3-phase-motor, velocity control mode.

Device: Treadmetrix

ETM Motor

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects will undergo a balance assessment using the following program on the treadmill: single-phase, velocity control mode.

Device: Treadmetrix

NIDEC/CT Motor

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects will undergo a balance assessment using the following program on the treadmill: single-phase motor, position-mode.

Device: Treadmetrix

Interventions

Programmable treadmill that delivers controlled postural disturbances

ABB MotorETM MotorNIDEC/CT Motor

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy adults with no medical conditions or previous injuries, trauma, or surgeries that reduce your balance, mobility or strength.
  • Able to follow simple directions.
  • Willingness to participate in the study.
  • No restriction will be placed on gender, race, or ethnicity.

You may not qualify if:

  • Current or chronic pain in your shoulders, elbows, hips, knees, ankles, feet, neck or back.
  • Use of assistive device such as walker or cane.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mayo Clinic Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
Kenton Kaufman, Ph.D
Organization
Mayo Clinic

Study Officials

  • Kenton Kaufman, PhD

    Mayo Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2022

First Posted

April 18, 2022

Study Start

June 17, 2022

Primary Completion

December 17, 2024

Study Completion

December 17, 2024

Last Updated

December 23, 2025

Results First Posted

December 23, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Locations