Comparison of Endoscopic Band Ligation Plus 24-hour Versus 72-hour Terlipressin Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
109
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In the Western world, liver cirrhosis is a significant issue. Acute variceal bleeding (AVB) is a considerable complication of cirrhosis associated with high mortality. Still, the combination of endoscopic variceal ligation and terlipressin-like treatment decreases the risks of rebleeding and mortality. This therapy with terlipressin usually was used for 72 hours. However, there are some studies demostrating that using terlipressin for 24 hours could control variceal bleeding with fewer side effects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2022
CompletedApril 18, 2022
April 1, 2022
9 months
March 29, 2022
April 9, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compare the 24-h group vs 72-h group
Differences between groups at baseline were evaluated with Student's t-test test for continuous variables and proportions were compared using the Chi2 or Fisher test.
The total study time ranges from the first day of telmipressin infusion to 6 weeks after the event
Study Arms (2)
24-h group
EXPERIMENTALThe 24-h group received intravenous terlipressin (Glypressin® Ferring Pharmaceuticals) as an initial intravenous bolus of 2 mg (10 ml) and thereafter every 6 hours for a period of 24 hours.
72-h group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe 72-h group received the standard treatment with administration of intravenous terlipressin (Glypressin® Ferring Pharmaceuticals) with an initial intravenous bolus of 2 mg (10 ml) and thereafter every 6 hours for a period of 72 hours. Terlipressin was administered blinded after endoscopic treatment and infused as a 5 ml bolus in a pre-prepared syringe
Interventions
Subjects were randomly allocated to banding ligation plus terlipressin infusion for 24 hours (24-h group) or banding ligation plus terlipressin infusion for 72 hours (72-h group) using a blocked allocation strategy. The 72-h group received the standard treatment with administration of intravenous terlipressin (Glypressin® Ferring Pharmaceuticals) with an initial intravenous bolus of 2 mg (10 ml) and thereafter every 6 hours for a period of 72 hours. Terlipressin was administered blinded after endoscopic treatment and infused as a 5 ml bolus in a pre-prepared syringe. The 24-h group received intravenous terlipressin (Glypressin® Ferring Pharmaceuticals) as an initial intravenous bolus of 2 mg (10 ml) and thereafter every 6 hours for a period of 24 hours.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients of 18 years and older
- Both genders,
- Diagnosis of liver cirrhosis with a Child-Pugh score ≤ 11 (class B or C)
- Acute variceal bleeding were included
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with contraindications to terlipressin (pregnancy, breastfeeding, or severe cardiopulmonary diseases),
- Presence of sepsis,
- Multi-organ failure,
- The requirement of continuous ionotropic or ventilatory support,
- Bleeding disorders,
- Hepatocellular carcinoma or other extrahepatic malignanc.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44329, Mexico
Related Publications (21)
Roesch-Dietlen F, Gonzalez-Santes M, Sanchez-Maza YJ, Diaz-Roesch F, Cano-Contreras AD, Amieva-Balmori M, Garcia-Zermeno KR, Salgado-Vergara L, Remes-Troche JM, Ortigoza-Gutierrez S. Influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors in the etiology of cirrhosis of the liver. Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed). 2021 Jan-Mar;86(1):28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Apr 25. English, Spanish.
PMID: 32345507BACKGROUNDBerardo C, Di Pasqua LG, Cagna M, Richelmi P, Vairetti M, Ferrigno A. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis: Current Issues and Future Perspectives in Preclinical and Clinical Research. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Dec 17;21(24):9646. doi: 10.3390/ijms21249646.
PMID: 33348908BACKGROUNDBoregowda U, Umapathy C, Halim N, Desai M, Nanjappa A, Arekapudi S, Theethira T, Wong H, Roytman M, Saligram S. Update on the management of gastrointestinal varices. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jan 21;10(1):1-21. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v10.i1.1.
PMID: 30697445BACKGROUNDBosch J, Pizcueta MP, Fernandez M, Feu F, Cirera I, Luca A, Garcia-Pagan JC. Hepatic, splanchnic and systemic haemodynamic abnormalities in portal hypertension. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol. 1992 Sep;6(3):425-36. doi: 10.1016/0950-3528(92)90030-i.
PMID: 1421593BACKGROUNDKalambokis G, Tsiouris S, Tsianos EV, Baltayiannis G, Pakou B, Fotopoulos A. Effects of terlipressin and somatostatin on liver and thorax blood volumes in patients with cirrhosis. Liver Int. 2010 Oct;30(9):1371-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2010.02322.x.
PMID: 20738780BACKGROUNDKovalak M, Lake J, Mattek N, Eisen G, Lieberman D, Zaman A. Endoscopic screening for varices in cirrhotic patients: data from a national endoscopic database. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Jan;65(1):82-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.08.023.
PMID: 17185084BACKGROUNDGarcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND, Carey W; Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2007 Sep;46(3):922-38. doi: 10.1002/hep.21907. No abstract available.
PMID: 17879356BACKGROUNDFortune BE, Groszmann RJ. Combination of splanchnic vasoconstrictors and endoscopic band ligation is an effective treatment strategy for acute variceal hemorrhage; but how do we get those drugs approved by the FDA? Hepatology. 2014 Sep;60(3):789-91. doi: 10.1002/hep.27080. Epub 2014 Jul 28. No abstract available.
PMID: 24700393BACKGROUNDBendtsen F, Krag A, Moller S. Treatment of acute variceal bleeding. Dig Liver Dis. 2008 May;40(5):328-36. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
PMID: 18243077BACKGROUNDZhou X, Tripathi D, Song T, Shao L, Han B, Zhu J, Han D, Liu F, Qi X. Terlipressin for the treatment of acute variceal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(48):e13437. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013437.
PMID: 30508958BACKGROUNDBanares R, Albillos A, Rincon D, Alonso S, Gonzalez M, Ruiz-del-Arbol L, Salcedo M, Molinero LM. Endoscopic treatment versus endoscopic plus pharmacologic treatment for acute variceal bleeding: a meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2002 Mar;35(3):609-15. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.31354.
PMID: 11870374BACKGROUNDKrag A, Borup T, Moller S, Bendtsen F. Efficacy and safety of terlipressin in cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding or hepatorenal syndrome. Adv Ther. 2008 Nov;25(11):1105-40. doi: 10.1007/s12325-008-0118-7.
PMID: 19018483BACKGROUNDDohler KD, Walker S, Mentz P, Forssmann K, Staritz M. [Vasoconstrictive Therapies for Bleeding Esophageal Varices and their Mechanisms of Action]. Z Gastroenterol. 2003 Oct;41(10):1001-16. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-42931. German.
PMID: 14562199BACKGROUNDSalim A, Malik K, Haq IU, Butt AK, Alam A. Comparison of 12-Hour with 72-Hour Terlipressin Therapy for Bleeding Esophageal Varices. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2017 Jun;27(6):334-337.
PMID: 28689520BACKGROUNDMoller S, Hansen EF, Becker U, Brinch K, Henriksen JH, Bendtsen F. Central and systemic haemodynamic effects of terlipressin in portal hypertensive patients. Liver. 2000 Feb;20(1):51-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0676.2000.020001051.x.
PMID: 10726961BACKGROUNDYao Q, Chen W, Yan C, Yu J, Jiang T, Cao H. Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Patients With Portal Hypertension and Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 3;8:712918. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.712918. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34540867BACKGROUNDAbid S, Jafri W, Hamid S, Salih M, Azam Z, Mumtaz K, Shah HA, Abbas Z. Terlipressin vs. octreotide in bleeding esophageal varices as an adjuvant therapy with endoscopic band ligation: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):617-23. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.147. Epub 2009 Feb 17.
PMID: 19223890BACKGROUNDIoannou G, Doust J, Rockey DC. Terlipressin for acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(1):CD002147. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002147.
PMID: 12535432BACKGROUNDYeh JH, Lo GH, Huang RY, Lin CW, Wang WL, Perng DS. Short-course vasoconstrictors are adequate for esophageal variceal bleeding after endoscopic variceal ligation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Prog. 2021 Jul-Sep;104(3):368504211031711. doi: 10.1177/00368504211031711.
PMID: 34260315BACKGROUNDAzam Z, Hamid S, Jafri W, Salih M, Abbas Z, Abid S, Shah H. Short course adjuvant terlipressin in acute variceal bleeding: a randomized double blind dummy controlled trial. J Hepatol. 2012 Apr;56(4):819-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.11.019. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
PMID: 22178268BACKGROUNDByrne CD, Targher G. NAFLD: a multisystem disease. J Hepatol. 2015 Apr;62(1 Suppl):S47-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.12.012.
PMID: 25920090RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alejandro González-Ojeda
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Subjects were randomly allocated to banding ligation plus terlipressin infusion for 24 hours (24-h group) or banding ligation plus terlipressin infusion for 72 hours (72-h group) using a blocked allocation strategy
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2022
First Posted
April 18, 2022
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
September 30, 2021
Study Completion
September 30, 2021
Last Updated
April 18, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04