Virtual Reality Training Intervention on Cognitive Function and Quality of Life
Effects of Incorporating Virtual Reality Training Intervention Into Health Care on Cognitive Function and Quality of Life in Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present study aimed to investigate the effects of a Virtual Reality cognitive training intervention (VRCTI) on cognitive function changes measured with a cognitive test battery and improvement of quality of life in older adults with cognitive impairment in long-term care facilities. Weekly 1-hour sessions were implemented over 8 weeks targeting sustained and selective attention, memory, cognitive functions, and rule deduction. The passive control group received usual care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 14, 2022
CompletedApril 14, 2022
April 1, 2022
1.9 years
March 21, 2022
April 7, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Cognitive Assessment Screening Instrument (CASI)
The CASI evaluates global cognitive function using 9 cognitive domains: long-term memory, short-term memory, attention, mental manipulation, orientation, abstraction and judgment, language abilities, visual construction, and list-generating fluency. Typical administration time is about 20 minutes. The total score ranges from 0 to 100. A greater score demonstrates better global cognitive function.
Change is being assessed. Change in Cognitive Assessment Screening Instrument (CASI) from baseline to immediately after the intervention.
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
General cognitive functioning was assessed with the Chinese version of the MMSE, which is a cognitive screening tool used to evaluate cognitive decline, screen for cognitive impairment, to evaluate the severity of the impairment, and to monitor cognitive change over time. The higher score indicates the better cognitive function.
Change is being assessed. Change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) from baseline to immediately after the intervention.
Clock Drawing Test-Drawing Part, (CDT-D)
The CDT-D has been widely used as a neuropsychological screening test in the detection of cognitive impairment in populations. The lower the patients' clock scores the more likely were patients to be classified as impaired in elderly outpatients.
Change is being assessed. Change in Clock Drawing Test-Drawing Part, (CDT-D) from baseline to immediately after the intervention.
World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF)
The WHOQOL-BREF contains 28 items classified into the same 4 domains related to quality of life (physical health, psychological, social relationships and environment). All items were rated on a 5-point scale with a higher score indicating a higher quality of life.
Change is being assessed. Change in World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) from baseline to immediately after the intervention.
Study Arms (2)
The VR group: the Virtual Reality Cognitive Training Intervention (VRCTI)
EXPERIMENTALThe VRCTI was developed to improve cognitive function. The intervention was designed that simulated schema of underwater world fish swimming. Each 1-hour session was typically divided into three parts: easy, medium and difficult, each with 4 different tasks, so there are 12 tasks/session in total. In some tasks, the VRCTI also distinguished between the real lure (e.g. a red triangle fish with a half-moon pattern) as well as unrelated lure items (i.e., blue square fish with polka dot pattern and other irrelevant items). The use of hardware elements for this study included visual (head-mounted display \[HMD\] in delivering the VR intervention), audio, and motor equipment.
The control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group received usual care.
Interventions
The VRCTI was developed to improve cognitive function. The intervention was designed that simulated schema of underwater world fish swimming. Each 1-hour session was typically divided into three parts: easy, medium and difficult, each with 4 different tasks, so there are 12 tasks/session in total. In some tasks, the VRCTI also distinguished between the real lure (e.g. a red triangle fish with a half-moon pattern) as well as unrelated lure items (i.e., blue square fish with polka dot pattern and other irrelevant items). The use of hardware elements for this study included visual (head-mounted display \[HMD\] in delivering the VR intervention), audio, and motor equipment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged ≥ 65 years
- Admitted as residents at the study-site institutions (long-term care facilities)
- Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) ≥ 13
- Able to communicate sufficiently
You may not qualify if:
- Open facial wounds
- Problems with a finger, hand, or wrist and/or major visual or auditory impairment, making it difficult to deliver training scheme
- Major neurological or psychiatric conditions that may affect cognition (e.g., stroke, dizziness, schizophrenia)
- Unstable medical conditions
- Were unable to comply with the intervention
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
I-Shou University
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mei-Chi Hsu, Ph.D
I-Shou University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2022
First Posted
April 14, 2022
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
April 14, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The data presented in this study are available on request from the researcher. The data are not publicly available due to privacy and ethical restrictions.