Azithromycin Versus Erythromycin For Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes
1 other identifier
interventional
240
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Aim 1. To examine the latency period according to antibiotic regimens (erythromycin iv for two days followed by orally for 5 days vs. azithromycin iv for 2 days followed by 5 days orally). Aim 2. To examine the latency period according to races stratified by antibiotic regimens. Aim 3: To examine if there is a difference in neonatal morbidity and mortality stratified by antibiotic regimen.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 7, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 14, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2025
CompletedApril 14, 2022
April 1, 2022
3 years
April 7, 2022
April 13, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Latency Period
The time interval between the first antibiotic dose to time of delivery.
At delivery
Study Arms (2)
Erythromycin
EXPERIMENTALReceive 1) erythromycin 250 mg iv every 6 hours for 48 hours followed by 333 mg orally (pills) every 8 hours for 5 days
Azithromycin
EXPERIMENTALReceive azithromycin 500 mg iv daily for 48 hours followed by 500 mg orally (pills) for 5 days.
Interventions
In the absence of labor, broad-spectrum antibiotics (often called latency antibiotics) are recommended for women with PPROM less than 34 weeks to reduce chorioamnionitis, prolong latency, and decrease neonatal sepsis (12,13).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Singleton pregnancy
- PPROM from 22 weeks 0 days to 31 weeks 6 days at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
- Membrane rupture within 36 hours of randomization, cervical dilation 3 cm or less, and 4 or fewer contractions in the 60-minutes monitoring before randomization
You may not qualify if:
- Non-reassuring fetal heart tracing
- Vaginal bleeding
- Indications for delivery
- Received any antibiotic therapy within 7 days other than initiation of Ampicillin treatment as part of latency antibiotics prior to transfer to Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
- Allergy to penicillin, erythromycin, or azithromycin
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (24)
Waters TP, Mercer B. Preterm PROM: prediction, prevention, principles. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;54(2):307-12. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e318217d4d3.
PMID: 21508700BACKGROUNDMeis PJ, Ernest JM, Moore ML. Causes of low birth weight births in public and private patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 May;156(5):1165-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(87)90133-5.
PMID: 3578431BACKGROUNDBeydoun SN, Yasin SY. Premature rupture of the membranes before 28 weeks: conservative management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Sep;155(3):471-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90257-7.
PMID: 3752169BACKGROUNDGarite TJ, Freeman RK. Chorioamnionitis in the preterm gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 1982 May;59(5):539-45.
PMID: 7070724BACKGROUNDPergialiotis V, Bellos I, Fanaki M, Antsaklis A, Loutradis D, Daskalakis G. The impact of residual oligohydramnios following preterm premature rupture of membranes on adverse pregnancy outcomes: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;222(6):628-630. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.022. Epub 2020 Feb 25. No abstract available.
PMID: 32109463BACKGROUNDCosteloe KL, Hennessy EM, Haider S, Stacey F, Marlow N, Draper ES. Short term outcomes after extreme preterm birth in England: comparison of two birth cohorts in 1995 and 2006 (the EPICure studies). BMJ. 2012 Dec 4;345:e7976. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7976.
PMID: 23212881BACKGROUNDMarlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell MA, Samara M; EPICure Study Group. Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jan 6;352(1):9-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041367.
PMID: 15635108BACKGROUNDAverbuch B, Mazor M, Shoham-Vardi I, Chaim W, Vardi H, Horowitz S, Shuster M. Intra-uterine infection in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes: maternal and neonatal characteristics. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995 Sep;62(1):25-9. doi: 10.1016/0301-2115(95)02176-8.
PMID: 7493703BACKGROUNDShen TT, DeFranco EA, Stamilio DM, Chang JJ, Muglia LJ. A population-based study of race-specific risk for preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct;199(4):373.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.05.011. Epub 2008 Jul 29.
PMID: 18667175BACKGROUNDDrassinower D, Friedman AM, Obican SG, Levin H, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Prolonged latency of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes and neurodevelopmental outcomes: a secondary analysis. BJOG. 2016 Sep;123(10):1629-35. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14133. Epub 2016 May 31.
PMID: 27245741BACKGROUNDBoghossian NS, Geraci M, Lorch SA, Phibbs CS, Edwards EM, Horbar JD. Racial and Ethnic Differences Over Time in Outcomes of Infants Born Less Than 30 Weeks' Gestation. Pediatrics. 2019 Sep;144(3):e20191106. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-1106. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
PMID: 31405887BACKGROUNDKenyon S, Boulvain M, Neilson JP. Antibiotics for preterm rupture of membranes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 2;2013(12):CD001058. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001058.pub3.
PMID: 24297389BACKGROUNDPrelabor Rupture of Membranes: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 217. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;135(3):e80-e97. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003700.
PMID: 32080050BACKGROUNDMercer BM, Moretti ML, Prevost RR, Sibai BM. Erythromycin therapy in preterm premature rupture of the membranes: a prospective, randomized trial of 220 patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Mar;166(3):794-802. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91336-9.
PMID: 1550145BACKGROUNDMercer BM, Miodovnik M, Thurnau GR, Goldenberg RL, Das AF, Ramsey RD, Rabello YA, Meis PJ, Moawad AH, Iams JD, Van Dorsten JP, Paul RH, Bottoms SF, Merenstein G, Thom EA, Roberts JM, McNellis D. Antibiotic therapy for reduction of infant morbidity after preterm premature rupture of the membranes. A randomized controlled trial. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. JAMA. 1997 Sep 24;278(12):989-95.
PMID: 9307346BACKGROUNDEdwards MS, Newman RB, Carter SG, Leboeuf FW, Menard MK, Rainwater KP. Randomized Clinical Trial of Azithromycin vs. Erythromycin for the Treatment of Chlamydia Cervicitis in Pregnancy. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1996;4(6):333-7. doi: 10.1155/S1064744996000671.
PMID: 18476121BACKGROUNDHopkins S. Clinical toleration and safety of azithromycin. Am J Med. 1991 Sep 12;91(3A):40S-45S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90401-i.
PMID: 1656742BACKGROUNDNavathe R, Schoen CN, Heidari P, Bachilova S, Ward A, Tepper J, Visintainer P, Hoffman MK, Smith S, Berghella V, Roman A. Azithromycin vs erythromycin for the management of preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;221(2):144.e1-144.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
PMID: 30904320BACKGROUNDFinneran MM, Appiagyei A, Templin M, Mertz H. Comparison of Azithromycin versus Erythromycin for Prolongation of Latency in Pregnancies Complicated by Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes. Am J Perinatol. 2017 Sep;34(11):1102-1107. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1603915. Epub 2017 Jun 21. No abstract available.
PMID: 28637060BACKGROUNDPierson RC, Gordon SS, Haas DM. A retrospective comparison of antibiotic regimens for preterm premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;124(3):515-519. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000426.
PMID: 25162251BACKGROUNDMartingano D, Singh S, Mitrofanova A. Azithromycin in the Treatment of Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes Demonstrates a Lower Risk of Chorioamnionitis and Postpartum Endometritis with an Equivalent Latency Period Compared with Erythromycin Antibiotic Regimens. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jul 9;2020:2093530. doi: 10.1155/2020/2093530. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32694907BACKGROUNDTsai D, Jamal JA, Davis JS, Lipman J, Roberts JA. Interethnic differences in pharmacokinetics of antibacterials. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015 Mar;54(3):243-60. doi: 10.1007/s40262-014-0209-3.
PMID: 25385446BACKGROUNDFohner AE, Sparreboom A, Altman RB, Klein TE. PharmGKB summary: Macrolide antibiotic pathway, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2017 Apr;27(4):164-167. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000270. No abstract available.
PMID: 28146011BACKGROUNDKumar D, Moore RM, Mercer BM, Mansour JM, Redline RW, Moore JJ. The physiology of fetal membrane weakening and rupture: Insights gained from the determination of physical properties revisited. Placenta. 2016 Jun;42:59-73. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
PMID: 27238715BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tetsuya Kawakita, MD
Eastern Virginia Medical School
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 7, 2022
First Posted
April 14, 2022
Study Start
May 1, 2022
Primary Completion
May 1, 2025
Study Completion
July 1, 2025
Last Updated
April 14, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share