Agreement Between Standard and Continuous Wireless Vital Sign Measurements
1 other identifier
observational
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients undergoing major surgery are at risk of postoperative complications. Continuous wireless monitoring outside the post-anesthesia or intensive care units may enable early detection of patient deterioration, but good accuracy of measurements is required. This validation study, which is part of the WARD-SX project, aimed to assess the agreement between vital signs recorded by standard and novel wireless devices
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Dec 2019
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 18, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 22, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 22, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 13, 2022
CompletedApril 19, 2022
April 1, 2022
7 months
April 5, 2022
April 12, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Heart rate comparisons
Heart rate (beats per minute) measurements compared between Isansys Lifetouch and standard monitoring (Phillips IntelliVue). Analysed using Bland Altman (BA) analysis to measure mean diference and limits of agreement between to methods. The BA analysis is corrected for repeated measures within each subject.
1.5 hours (measurement interval every 15 min)
Respiratory rate comparisons
Respiratory rate (breaths per minute) measurements compared between Isansys Lifetouch and observed counted measurements. Analysed using Bland Altman (BA) analysis to measure mean difference and limits of agreement between to methods. The BA analysis is corrected for repeated measures within each subject.
1.5 hours
SpO2 measurements comparisons wireless vs. standard
SpO2 (percent) measurements compared between Nonin WristOx 3150 and standard monitoring. Analysed using Bland Altman (BA) analysis to measure mean difference and limits of agreement between to methods. The BA analysis is corrected for repeated measures within each subject.
1.5 hours (measurement interval every 15 min)
SpO2 measurements comparisons wireless vs. invasive
SpO2 (percent) measurements compared between Nonin WristOx 3150 and arterial arterial oxygen saturation. Analysed using Bland Altman (BA) analysis to measure mean difference and limits of agreement between to methods. The BA analysis is corrected for repeated measures within each subject.
1.5 hours
Pulse rate comparisons
Pulse rate measurements (beats per minute) measures compared between Nonin WristOx 3150 and standard monitoring. Analysed using Bland Altman (BA) analysis to measure mean difference and limits of agreement between to methods. The BA analysis is corrected for repeated measures within each subject.
1.5 hours
Blood pressure comparisons wireless vs. standard
Blood pressure (mmHg) measurements compared between Meditech BlueBp-05 and standard monitoring. Analysed using Bland Altman (BA) analysis to measure mean difference and limits of agreement between to methods. The BA analysis is corrected for repeated measures within each subject.
1.5 hours, every 15 min
Blood pressure comparisons, wireless vs. arterial BP
Systolic and diastolic (mmHg) measurements compared between Meditech BlueBp-05 and invasive arterial blood pressure. Analysed using Bland Altman (BA) analysis to measure mean difference and limits of agreement between to methods. The BA analysis is corrected for repeated measures within each subject.
1.5 hours
Study Arms (1)
Device: Continuous monitoring system
Continuous monitoring system Recruited patients will be continuously monitored with Isansys Lifetouch patch, Nonin WristOx 3150, Isansys wireless blood pressure monitor (Meditech Blue BP-05) and standard monitoring at the post anesthesia care unit
Eligibility Criteria
Patients planned for major abdominal surgery at Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, and Rigshospitalet.
You may qualify if:
- ≥60 years, scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgery with planned PACU admission.
- Estimated surgical intervention duration ≥2 hours.
You may not qualify if:
- Implanted cardioverter defibrillator or pacemaker, allergy to study devices, severe cognitive impairment assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination ≤24, or inability to cooperate in wearing the wireless monitoring equipment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Anesthesiology, Center for Cancer and Organ Diseases
Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Eske K Aasvang, Dr. Med
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Camilla Haahr-Raunkjaer, MD
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 5, 2022
First Posted
April 13, 2022
Study Start
December 18, 2019
Primary Completion
July 22, 2020
Study Completion
July 22, 2020
Last Updated
April 19, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04