Influence of Co-diagnosis of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in Patients With Fibromyalgia.
1 other identifier
observational
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate differences in neuroimmunoendocrine response and quality of live in patients diagnosed with Fibromyalgia, with or without a co-diagnosis of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2021
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 9, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 22, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 18, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 12, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 16, 2024
CompletedMay 11, 2023
May 1, 2023
13 days
March 18, 2022
May 9, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (11)
Differences in perceived anxiety using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) is a self-reported, scientifically validated questionnaire that measures perceived anxiety. The STAI has 20 items for assessing trait anxiety and 20 for state anxiety. State anxiety items include: "I am tense; I am worried" and "I feel calm; I feel secure." Trait anxiety items include: "I worry too much over something that really doesn't matter" and "I am content; I am a steady person." All items are rated on a 4-point scale (e.g., from "Almost Never" to "Almost Always"). Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.
During the intervention, at day 1.
Differences in perceived stress using The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a self-reported, scientifically validated questionnaire that measures perceived stress. This scale is a self- report instrument that evaluates the level of perceived stress during the last month, and consists of 14 items with a 5-point response scale (0 = never, 1 = almost never, 2 = once in a while, 3 = often, 4 = very often). The total score of the PSS is obtained by reversing the scores of items 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, and 13 (in the following manner: 0 = 4, 1 = 3, 2 = 2, 3 = 1, and 4 = 0) and subsequently adding the 14 item scores. A higher score indicates a higher level of perceived stress.
During the intervention, at day 1.
Differences in perceived depression using the Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI)
Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) is a self-reported, scientifically validated questionnaire that measures perceived depression. Each of the 21 items on the BDI measures the presence and severity of a symptom of depression by requiring a self-rating from 0 to 3. Mild (low) scores are less than 4; moderate (medium) is between 14 and 20, and severe 21 and above. Unless otherwise indicated, the use of "mild," "moderate," and "severe" levels of depression throughout the remainder of this chapter will refer to the aforementioned ranges.
During the intervention, at day 1.
Differences in perceived pain using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is a self-reported, scientifically validated questionnaire that measures perceived pain. The BPI starts with a screening question, asking about the presence of pain and a body chart is used to indicate painful regions as well as the worst region. These items aren´t evaluated. This is followed by the core BPI items: the rating scales for pain severity and interference. Numerical rating scales from 0 to 10 are used for all items. The anchors for pain severity scales are 0 = 'no pain' and 10 = 'pain as bad as you can imagine', whilst the interference anchors are 0 = 'no interference' and 10 = 'interferes completely'.
During the intervention, at day 1.
Differences in perceived pain using the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) has nine items, with the items measured on 0-10 numeric rating scales. Three items ask patients to rate the severity of their fatigue at its "worst," "usual," and"now" during normal waking hours, with 0 being "no fatigue" and 10 being "fatigue as bad as you can imagine." Six items assess the amount that fatigue has interfered with different aspects of the patient's life during the past 24 hours. The interference items include general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. The interference items are measured on a 0 -10 scale, with 0 beings "does not interfere" and 10 being "completely interferes."
During the intervention, at day 1.
Differences in subjective quality of sleep using The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality lndex (PSQI) contains 19 self-rated questions and 5 questions rated by the bed partner or roommate (if one is available). Only self-rated questions are included in the scoring. The 19 self-rated items are combined to form seven "component" scores, each of which has a range of 0-3 points. In all cases, a score of "0" indicates no difficulty, while a score of "3" indicates severe difficulty. The seven component scores are then added to yield one "global" score, with a range of 0-21 points, "0" indicating no difficulty and "21 " indicating severe difficulties in all areas.
During the intervention, at day 1.
Differences in subjective quality of life using The Healthy Lifestyle and Personal Control Questionnaire (HLPCQ)
The Healthy Lifestyle and Personal Control Questionnaire (HLPCQ) This is a 26-item tool in which the respondent is asked to indicate the frequency of adopting 26 positively stated lifestyle habits using a Likert-type scale (1=Never or rarely, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often, and 4 = Always).
During the intervention, at day 1.
Differences in perceived anxiety related to Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) using the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS)
The Coronavirus Anxiety Scale is a brief mental health screener that can be used to identify cases of dysfunctional anxiety related to COVID-19. The items measure physiologically-based symptoms that are aroused with coronavirus-related information and thoughts using a 5-point time anchored scale (0=not at all to 4=nearly every day over the last 2 weeks).
During the intervention, at day 1.
Differences in fear of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) using the Fear COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S)
The Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) is used to identify and intervene early, psychologically, in people with high values of fear of COVID-19. This one-dimensional scale is made up of seven items with a 5-point Likert response ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) and the total tables can range between 7 and 35 points. The higher the score, the greater the fear of COVID-19 infection.
During the intervention, at day 1.
Objective differences in physical activity, sedentary lifestyle and sleep using the accelerometer technique (ActiGraph)
An accelerometer is a small device, like a wristwatch, used to measure physical activity level, patterns of activity, sedentary levels, sleep patterns, and the expenditure of calories consumed, basal and total Metabolic Equivalent of Task (METs) used as an assessment of the metabolism of the person wearing it.
Up to 1 week
Determination of immuno-neuroendocrine parameters (cytokines, catecholamines, and stress hormones)
Cytokines (IL-8, IL-10), catecholamines (such as epinephrine, and norepinephrine) as well as stress hormones (serotonin and cortisol), were analyzed by competitive inhibition enzyme immunoassays (ELISA)
Through study completion, an average of 2 year
Study Arms (3)
Control Healthy Women
Aged-matched control group of healthy women.
Only Fibromyalgia
Patients diagnosed only with fibromyalgia.
Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.
Interventions
The groups fill out scientifically validated questionnaires to know the differences in perceived stress, anxiety, quality of life, depression, quality of sleep, pain, fatigue, and impact of the disease on daily life.
Blood collection by qualified personnel.
To know the objective differences between physical activity/sedentary lifestyle, caloric expenditure and quality of sleep, we used the accelerometry technique
On two separate days, the "baseline-tests" and "final-tests" were conducted. All participants performed a series of tests, before which they had to fast. The order and schedule (8 am) of the tests was the same for the "final-test" and the same materials and procedures were used. A period of 30 consecutive days elapsed between the base-line and final tests, during which the participants had to ingest their supplement (synbiotic).
Eligibility Criteria
The present investigation is carried out in two experimental groups: patients diagnosed with Fibromyalgia and patients diagnosed with Fibromyalgia and a co-diagnosis of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, all of them volunteers facilitated through the Fibromyalgia Associations of Badajoz and Cáceres, Extremadura, Spain.
You may qualify if:
- Fibromyalgia and/or Chronic Fatigue Syndrome diagnosis by rheumatologists or internal medicine professionals.
- Age not less than 40 years old and not more than 65 years old.
You may not qualify if:
- Suffering from diagnosed "major depression".
- Suffer diagnosed multiple chemical sensitivity.
- Corticosteroid treatment or anti-cytokine therapies.
- Periodically carry out programmed therapeutic physical activity in the two months prior to the accelerometry tests.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Extremadura
Badajoz, 06006, Spain
Related Publications (11)
Adler GK, Geenen R. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal and autonomic nervous system functioning in fibromyalgia. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2005 Feb;31(1):187-202, xi. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2004.10.002.
PMID: 15639063BACKGROUNDGuillen-Riquelme A, Buela-Casal G. [Meta-analysis of group comparison and meta-analysis of reliability generalization of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Questionnaire (STAI)]. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2014 Jan-Feb;88(1):101-12. doi: 10.4321/S1135-57272014000100007. Spanish.
PMID: 24728394BACKGROUNDRemor E. Psychometric properties of a European Spanish version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Span J Psychol. 2006 May;9(1):86-93. doi: 10.1017/s1138741600006004.
PMID: 16673626BACKGROUNDBECK AT, WARD CH, MENDELSON M, MOCK J, ERBAUGH J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-71. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004. No abstract available.
PMID: 13688369BACKGROUNDPoquet N, Lin C. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). J Physiother. 2016 Jan;62(1):52. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Aug 21. No abstract available.
PMID: 26303366BACKGROUNDMendoza TR, Wang XS, Cleeland CS, Morrissey M, Johnson BA, Wendt JK, Huber SL. The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: use of the Brief Fatigue Inventory. Cancer. 1999 Mar 1;85(5):1186-96. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990301)85:53.0.co;2-n.
PMID: 10091805BACKGROUNDBuysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
PMID: 2748771BACKGROUNDDarviri C, Alexopoulos EC, Artemiadis AK, Tigani X, Kraniotou C, Darvyri P, Chrousos GP. The Healthy Lifestyle and Personal Control Questionnaire (HLPCQ): a novel tool for assessing self-empowerment through a constellation of daily activities. BMC Public Health. 2014 Sep 24;14:995. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-995.
PMID: 25253039BACKGROUNDFreedson P, Bowles HR, Troiano R, Haskell W. Assessment of physical activity using wearable monitors: recommendations for monitor calibration and use in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jan;44(1 Suppl 1):S1-4. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399b7e.
PMID: 22157769BACKGROUNDLee SA. Coronavirus Anxiety Scale: A brief mental health screener for COVID-19 related anxiety. Death Stud. 2020;44(7):393-401. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2020.1748481. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
PMID: 32299304BACKGROUNDAhorsu DK, Lin CY, Imani V, Saffari M, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. The Fear of COVID-19 Scale: Development and Initial Validation. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(3):1537-1545. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
PMID: 32226353BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Staff Scientist, Research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2022
First Posted
April 12, 2022
Study Start
June 9, 2021
Primary Completion
June 22, 2021
Study Completion
November 16, 2024
Last Updated
May 11, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share