NCT05323838

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate differences in neuroimmunoendocrine response and quality of live in patients diagnosed with Fibromyalgia, with or without a co-diagnosis of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
140

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2021

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 9, 2021

Completed
13 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 22, 2021

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 18, 2022

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 12, 2022

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 16, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

May 11, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

13 days

First QC Date

March 18, 2022

Last Update Submit

May 9, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (11)

  • Differences in perceived anxiety using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)

    State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) is a self-reported, scientifically validated questionnaire that measures perceived anxiety. The STAI has 20 items for assessing trait anxiety and 20 for state anxiety. State anxiety items include: "I am tense; I am worried" and "I feel calm; I feel secure." Trait anxiety items include: "I worry too much over something that really doesn't matter" and "I am content; I am a steady person." All items are rated on a 4-point scale (e.g., from "Almost Never" to "Almost Always"). Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.

    During the intervention, at day 1.

  • Differences in perceived stress using The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)

    The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a self-reported, scientifically validated questionnaire that measures perceived stress. This scale is a self- report instrument that evaluates the level of perceived stress during the last month, and consists of 14 items with a 5-point response scale (0 = never, 1 = almost never, 2 = once in a while, 3 = often, 4 = very often). The total score of the PSS is obtained by reversing the scores of items 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, and 13 (in the following manner: 0 = 4, 1 = 3, 2 = 2, 3 = 1, and 4 = 0) and subsequently adding the 14 item scores. A higher score indicates a higher level of perceived stress.

    During the intervention, at day 1.

  • Differences in perceived depression using the Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI)

    Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) is a self-reported, scientifically validated questionnaire that measures perceived depression. Each of the 21 items on the BDI measures the presence and severity of a symptom of depression by requiring a self-rating from 0 to 3. Mild (low) scores are less than 4; moderate (medium) is between 14 and 20, and severe 21 and above. Unless otherwise indicated, the use of "mild," "moderate," and "severe" levels of depression throughout the remainder of this chapter will refer to the aforementioned ranges.

    During the intervention, at day 1.

  • Differences in perceived pain using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)

    Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is a self-reported, scientifically validated questionnaire that measures perceived pain. The BPI starts with a screening question, asking about the presence of pain and a body chart is used to indicate painful regions as well as the worst region. These items aren´t evaluated. This is followed by the core BPI items: the rating scales for pain severity and interference. Numerical rating scales from 0 to 10 are used for all items. The anchors for pain severity scales are 0 = 'no pain' and 10 = 'pain as bad as you can imagine', whilst the interference anchors are 0 = 'no interference' and 10 = 'interferes completely'.

    During the intervention, at day 1.

  • Differences in perceived pain using the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)

    The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) has nine items, with the items measured on 0-10 numeric rating scales. Three items ask patients to rate the severity of their fatigue at its "worst," "usual," and"now" during normal waking hours, with 0 being "no fatigue" and 10 being "fatigue as bad as you can imagine." Six items assess the amount that fatigue has interfered with different aspects of the patient's life during the past 24 hours. The interference items include general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. The interference items are measured on a 0 -10 scale, with 0 beings "does not interfere" and 10 being "completely interferes."

    During the intervention, at day 1.

  • Differences in subjective quality of sleep using The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality lndex (PSQI) contains 19 self-rated questions and 5 questions rated by the bed partner or roommate (if one is available). Only self-rated questions are included in the scoring. The 19 self-rated items are combined to form seven "component" scores, each of which has a range of 0-3 points. In all cases, a score of "0" indicates no difficulty, while a score of "3" indicates severe difficulty. The seven component scores are then added to yield one "global" score, with a range of 0-21 points, "0" indicating no difficulty and "21 " indicating severe difficulties in all areas.

    During the intervention, at day 1.

  • Differences in subjective quality of life using The Healthy Lifestyle and Personal Control Questionnaire (HLPCQ)

    The Healthy Lifestyle and Personal Control Questionnaire (HLPCQ) This is a 26-item tool in which the respondent is asked to indicate the frequency of adopting 26 positively stated lifestyle habits using a Likert-type scale (1=Never or rarely, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often, and 4 = Always).

    During the intervention, at day 1.

  • Differences in perceived anxiety related to Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) using the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS)

    The Coronavirus Anxiety Scale is a brief mental health screener that can be used to identify cases of dysfunctional anxiety related to COVID-19. The items measure physiologically-based symptoms that are aroused with coronavirus-related information and thoughts using a 5-point time anchored scale (0=not at all to 4=nearly every day over the last 2 weeks).

    During the intervention, at day 1.

  • Differences in fear of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) using the Fear COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S)

    The Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) is used to identify and intervene early, psychologically, in people with high values of fear of COVID-19. This one-dimensional scale is made up of seven items with a 5-point Likert response ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) and the total tables can range between 7 and 35 points. The higher the score, the greater the fear of COVID-19 infection.

    During the intervention, at day 1.

  • Objective differences in physical activity, sedentary lifestyle and sleep using the accelerometer technique (ActiGraph)

    An accelerometer is a small device, like a wristwatch, used to measure physical activity level, patterns of activity, sedentary levels, sleep patterns, and the expenditure of calories consumed, basal and total Metabolic Equivalent of Task (METs) used as an assessment of the metabolism of the person wearing it.

    Up to 1 week

  • Determination of immuno-neuroendocrine parameters (cytokines, catecholamines, and stress hormones)

    Cytokines (IL-8, IL-10), catecholamines (such as epinephrine, and norepinephrine) as well as stress hormones (serotonin and cortisol), were analyzed by competitive inhibition enzyme immunoassays (ELISA)

    Through study completion, an average of 2 year

Study Arms (3)

Control Healthy Women

Aged-matched control group of healthy women.

Behavioral: Subjective quality of liveProcedure: Blood extractionBehavioral: Accelerometry

Only Fibromyalgia

Patients diagnosed only with fibromyalgia.

Behavioral: Subjective quality of liveProcedure: Blood extractionBehavioral: AccelerometryDietary Supplement: Synbiotic complement

Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.

Behavioral: Subjective quality of liveProcedure: Blood extractionBehavioral: AccelerometryDietary Supplement: Synbiotic complement

Interventions

The groups fill out scientifically validated questionnaires to know the differences in perceived stress, anxiety, quality of life, depression, quality of sleep, pain, fatigue, and impact of the disease on daily life.

Control Healthy WomenFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue SyndromeOnly Fibromyalgia

Blood collection by qualified personnel.

Control Healthy WomenFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue SyndromeOnly Fibromyalgia
AccelerometryBEHAVIORAL

To know the objective differences between physical activity/sedentary lifestyle, caloric expenditure and quality of sleep, we used the accelerometry technique

Control Healthy WomenFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue SyndromeOnly Fibromyalgia
Synbiotic complementDIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

On two separate days, the "baseline-tests" and "final-tests" were conducted. All participants performed a series of tests, before which they had to fast. The order and schedule (8 am) of the tests was the same for the "final-test" and the same materials and procedures were used. A period of 30 consecutive days elapsed between the base-line and final tests, during which the participants had to ingest their supplement (synbiotic).

Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue SyndromeOnly Fibromyalgia

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 65 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The present investigation is carried out in two experimental groups: patients diagnosed with Fibromyalgia and patients diagnosed with Fibromyalgia and a co-diagnosis of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, all of them volunteers facilitated through the Fibromyalgia Associations of Badajoz and Cáceres, Extremadura, Spain.

You may qualify if:

  • Fibromyalgia and/or Chronic Fatigue Syndrome diagnosis by rheumatologists or internal medicine professionals.
  • Age not less than 40 years old and not more than 65 years old.

You may not qualify if:

  • Suffering from diagnosed "major depression".
  • Suffer diagnosed multiple chemical sensitivity.
  • Corticosteroid treatment or anti-cytokine therapies.
  • Periodically carry out programmed therapeutic physical activity in the two months prior to the accelerometry tests.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Extremadura

Badajoz, 06006, Spain

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Adler GK, Geenen R. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal and autonomic nervous system functioning in fibromyalgia. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2005 Feb;31(1):187-202, xi. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2004.10.002.

    PMID: 15639063BACKGROUND
  • Guillen-Riquelme A, Buela-Casal G. [Meta-analysis of group comparison and meta-analysis of reliability generalization of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Questionnaire (STAI)]. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2014 Jan-Feb;88(1):101-12. doi: 10.4321/S1135-57272014000100007. Spanish.

    PMID: 24728394BACKGROUND
  • Remor E. Psychometric properties of a European Spanish version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Span J Psychol. 2006 May;9(1):86-93. doi: 10.1017/s1138741600006004.

    PMID: 16673626BACKGROUND
  • BECK AT, WARD CH, MENDELSON M, MOCK J, ERBAUGH J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-71. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004. No abstract available.

    PMID: 13688369BACKGROUND
  • Poquet N, Lin C. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). J Physiother. 2016 Jan;62(1):52. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Aug 21. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26303366BACKGROUND
  • Mendoza TR, Wang XS, Cleeland CS, Morrissey M, Johnson BA, Wendt JK, Huber SL. The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: use of the Brief Fatigue Inventory. Cancer. 1999 Mar 1;85(5):1186-96. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990301)85:53.0.co;2-n.

    PMID: 10091805BACKGROUND
  • Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.

    PMID: 2748771BACKGROUND
  • Darviri C, Alexopoulos EC, Artemiadis AK, Tigani X, Kraniotou C, Darvyri P, Chrousos GP. The Healthy Lifestyle and Personal Control Questionnaire (HLPCQ): a novel tool for assessing self-empowerment through a constellation of daily activities. BMC Public Health. 2014 Sep 24;14:995. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-995.

    PMID: 25253039BACKGROUND
  • Freedson P, Bowles HR, Troiano R, Haskell W. Assessment of physical activity using wearable monitors: recommendations for monitor calibration and use in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jan;44(1 Suppl 1):S1-4. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399b7e.

    PMID: 22157769BACKGROUND
  • Lee SA. Coronavirus Anxiety Scale: A brief mental health screener for COVID-19 related anxiety. Death Stud. 2020;44(7):393-401. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2020.1748481. Epub 2020 Apr 16.

    PMID: 32299304BACKGROUND
  • Ahorsu DK, Lin CY, Imani V, Saffari M, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. The Fear of COVID-19 Scale: Development and Initial Validation. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(3):1537-1545. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8. Epub 2020 Mar 27.

    PMID: 32226353BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

FibromyalgiaFatigue Syndrome, Chronic

Interventions

Accelerometry

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesEncephalomyelitisNeuroinflammatory DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Investigative Techniques

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Staff Scientist, Research

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2022

First Posted

April 12, 2022

Study Start

June 9, 2021

Primary Completion

June 22, 2021

Study Completion

November 16, 2024

Last Updated

May 11, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations