Effects of a Group EMDR Intervention on Narrative Complexity and Specificity of Autobiographical Memories: the Hug the Child Study (HTC)
HTC
Randomized Trial on the Effects of a Group EMDR Intervention on Narrative Complexity and Specificity of Autobiographical Memories: a Path Analytic and Supervised Machine Learning Approach
1 other identifier
interventional
27
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background and study aims: The Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Group Protocol with Children (EMDR-GP/C) was first developed by Korkmazlar following the Marmara earthquake in Turkey in 1999 and can be adapted for different populations. The aim of this study is to assess if a EMDR-GP program may help primary school students in improving narrative complexity and specificity of autobiographical memories, as well as their subjective unit of distress (SUD) and validity of cognition (VoC). Who can participate? Students attending the fourth or fifth year of primary school What does the study involve? Participants will be randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. Participants in the experimental group will undergo a 3-week EMDR-GP with weekly 60-minute group sessions (3 sessions), while the control group will follow routine daily school activities. Questionnaires will be used to assess narrative complexity, specificity of autobiographical memories, SUD and VoC before and after the intervention. What are the possible benefits and risks of participating? Benefits of participating in the study may include an improvement of narrative complexity, specificity of autobiographical memories, and their SUD and VoC.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 20, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 22, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 8, 2022
CompletedApril 8, 2022
March 1, 2022
2 months
March 22, 2022
March 31, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Event coding - Pre-intervention
Event coding is measured using Manual for Coding Events in Self Defining Memories. "Relationship" nominal score means a better outcome
Event coding is measured before the 3-week group EMDR intervention
Memory specificity level - Pre-intervention
Memory specificity level is measured using Classification System and Scoring for Self-defining Autobiographical Memories. "Specific" nominal score means a better outcome
Memory specificity level is measured before the 3-week group EMDR intervention
Narrative complexity level - Pre-intervention
Narrative complexity level is measured using Coding System for autobiographical Memory Narratives in Psychotherapy. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Narrative complexity level is measured before the 3-week group EMDR intervention
Subjective Unit of Distress - Pre-intervention
Subjective Unit of Distress is measured using a self-reporting scale with a 0- to 10-point rating scale. Higher scores mean a worse outcome
Subjective Unit of Distress is measured before the 3-week group EMDR intervention
Validity of Cognition - Pre-intervention
Validity of Cognition is measured using a self-reporting scale with a 1- to 7-point rating scale. Higher scores mean a better outcome
Validity of Cognition is measured before the 3-week group EMDR intervention
Event coding - Post-intervention
Event coding is measured using Manual for Coding Events in Self Defining Memories. "Relationship" nominal score means a better outcome
Event coding is measured after the 3-week group EMDR intervention
Memory specificity level - Post-intervention
Memory specificity level is measured using Classification System and Scoring for Self-defining Autobiographical Memories. "Specific" nominal score means a better outcome
Memory specificity level is measured after the 3-week group EMDR intervention
Narrative complexity level - Post-intervention
Narrative complexity level is measured using Coding System for autobiographical Memory Narratives in Psychotherapy. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Narrative complexity level is measured after the 3-week group EMDR intervention
Subjective Unit of Distress - Post-intervention
Subjective Unit of Distress is measured using a self-reporting scale with a 0- to 10-point rating scale. Higher scores mean a worse outcome
Subjective Unit of Distress is measured after the 3-week group EMDR intervention
Validity of Cognition - Post-intervention
Validity of Cognition is measured using a self-reporting scale with a 1- to 7-point rating scale. Higher scores mean a better outcome
Validity of Cognition is measured after the 3-week group EMDR intervention
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Autobiographical memory definition - Pre-intervention
Autobiographical memory definition is measured before the 3-week group EMDR intervention
Memory integration level - Pre-intervention
Memory integration level is measured before the 3-week group EMDR intervention
Autobiographical memory definition - Post-intervention
Autobiographical memory definition is measured after the 3-week group EMDR intervention
Memory integration level - Post-intervention
Memory integration level is measured after the 3-week group EMDR intervention
Study Arms (2)
Group EMDR
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the experimental group will undergo a 3-week group EMDR intervention with weekly 60-minute group sessions.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group will follow routine daily school activities
Interventions
The eight phases of the adapted group EMDR protocol was administered during each session: 1. Meeting: Explaining the nature of trauma, group rules, name tags, filling in the scales. 2. Preparation: Exploring children's support system, explaining EMDR, safe place, resource exercise, and installation with bilateral stimulation (BLS, butterfly hug or knee tapping). 3. Assessment: Drawing the worst image on a small separate sheet of paper, SUD level, (negative cognition, emotions, body sensations - if possible). 4. Desensitization: It is done with drawing on 4 separate papers with BLS (butterfly hug or knee tapping). 5. Installation: With the healing story written according to the adaptive information processing (AIP) model, the installation is accompanied BLS. 6. Body scan: A positive body state is installed with the relaxation technique. 7. Closure \& future template: Strong closure with artwork. 8. Re-evaluation: if possible.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children aged 9 to 11 years
- Children have reasonable comprehension of spoken language and can follow simple instructions
- Children and their parents are willing to attend all intervention sessions
- Children and parents have an adequate understanding of Italian
You may not qualify if:
- Concurrent enrollment in other intervention trials
- Child regularly practices EMDR intervention, or other therapeutical interventions, such as cognitive behavioral therapy or meditation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Pisa
Pisa, 56126, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Poli A, Gemignani A, Miccoli M. Randomized Trial on the Effects of a Group EMDR Intervention on Narrative Complexity and Specificity of Autobiographical Memories: A Path Analytic and Supervised Machine-Learning Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;19(13):7684. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137684.
PMID: 35805348DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrea Poli, Psy.D.
University of Pisa
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 22, 2022
First Posted
April 8, 2022
Study Start
August 20, 2021
Primary Completion
October 31, 2021
Study Completion
November 30, 2021
Last Updated
April 8, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
Raw data are available on request.