tDCS in Improving Quality of Sleep in Athletes
tDCS
The Effect of Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Improving Quality of Sleep in Athletes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sleep disturbances in athletes was found prevalent and affect their cognitive and physical abilities and increase the risk of injury. Moreover, studies showed also that a better sleep produces a better athletic performance. Therefore, it is important to find out management strategies that improve quality of sleep in this population. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that modulates cortical activity. tDCS has been conducted to improve wide range of neurological impairments including sleep. tDCS was used in improving the quality of sleep in older adults and in athletes. Both studies found improvement in some sleep indices.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 4, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 8, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedJuly 10, 2023
July 1, 2023
1.7 years
March 4, 2022
July 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Severity of sleep impairment (using Insomnia Severity Index)
The total score ranges between 0 and 28 with a higher score indicates more sever insomnia (worse).
Baseline.
Severity of sleep impairment (using Insomnia Severity Index)
The effect of the intervention on insomnia severity. The total score ranges between 0 and 28 with a higher score indicates more sever insomnia (worse).
After 4 weeks.
Quality of Sleep (using Actigraph activity monitor)
The wGT3X-BT is ActiGraph's flagship activity monitor, used to capture and record continuous, high resolution physical activity and sleep/wake information.
Baseline.
Quality of Sleep (using Actigraph activity monitor)
The effect of the intervention on quality of sleep. The wGT3X-BT is ActiGraph's flagship activity monitor, used to capture and record continuous, high resolution physical activity and sleep/wake information.
After 3 weeks.
Daytime sleepiness (using Epworth Sleepiness Scale)
It consists of 8 items where the subject uses a 4-point Likert scale to rate how likely they would be to fall asleep in 8 different scenarios of daily activities. The total score ranges between 0-24 with a higher score indicates worse daytime sleepiness.
Baseline.
Daytime sleepiness (using Epworth Sleepiness Scale)
The effect of the intervention on daytime sleepiness. It consists of 8 items where the subject uses a 4-point Likert scale to rate how likely they would be to fall asleep in 8 different scenarios of daily activities. The total score ranges between 0-24 with a higher score indicates worse daytime sleepiness.
After 4 weeks.
The Quality of sleep (Using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index)
The total score ranges from 0 to 21 with a higher score indicates poor quality of sleep (worse). A cut-off score of \>5 indicates poor sleep quality.
Screening for eligibility.
The Quality of sleep (Using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index)
The effect of the intervention on the Quality of sleep. The total score ranges from 0 to 21 with a higher score indicates poor quality of sleep (worse). A cut-off score of \>5 indicates poor sleep quality.
After 4 weeks.
The Quality of sleep (Using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index)
The effect of the intervention on the Quality of sleep. The total score ranges from 0 to 21 with a higher score indicates poor quality of sleep (worse). A cut-off score of \>5 indicates poor sleep quality.
After 2 Months from baseline.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
The Quality of Life (using Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 12)
Baseline.
The Quality of Life (using Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 12)
After 4 weeks.
The severity of anxiety, depression, and stress (using Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21)
Baseline.
The severity of anxiety, depression, and stress (using Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21)
After 4 weeks.
Study Arms (2)
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
EXPERIMENTALAthletes with poor sleep quality will receive tDCS over the right and left prefrontal cortex (F3 and F4 areas) with a constant current of 1.5 mA intensity that lasts for 20 minutes, 3 times a week for 2 weeks in daytime.
Sham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
SHAM COMPARATORAthletes with poor sleep quality will receive sham tDCS over the right and left prefrontal cortex.
Interventions
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that modulates cortical activity. tDCS has been conducted to improve wide range of neurological impairments including sleep.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Athletes who are 12 years of age and older.
- Athletes who have a complaint of sleep impairment determined by \>5 total score on Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).
You may not qualify if:
- Athletes who is using sleep medications or treatment.
- Athletes who have more than 1 concussion in the past year.
- Wearing a pacemaker.
- Pregnant athletes.
- Athletes who have repetitive migraine
- Athletes who are wearing a metal implant.
- Athletes who have epilepsy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Jordan
Amman, 11942, Jordan
Related Publications (1)
Etoom M, Alwardat M, Alghwiri A, Lena F, Romigi A. Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Sleep in Athletes: A Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 5;11(19):5883. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195883.
PMID: 36233749DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alia Alghwiri, PhD
University of Jordan
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Physiotherapy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 4, 2022
First Posted
April 8, 2022
Study Start
May 1, 2022
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
July 10, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share