NCT05317533

Brief Summary

Explore the prevalence of distal radial artery occlusion after cardiac catheterization via distal radial artery and the risk factors

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
805

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2022

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 30, 2022

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 8, 2022

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 18, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 18, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

December 19, 2023

Status Verified

December 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

March 30, 2022

Last Update Submit

December 18, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

distal radial artery occlusion;cardiac catheterization

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Prevalence of distal radial artery occlusion

    Prevalence of the distal radial artery occlusion is detected using ultrasound

    3 months after procedure

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Prevalence of distal radial artery occlusion

    1 day after procedure

  • Thickness of distal radial artery

    3 months after procedure

Interventions

cardiac catheterization via distal radial artery

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

The subjects consist of patients who present to the cardiac catheterization laboratory for an angiogram or percutaneous intervention for the first time.

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Palpable distal radial artery

You may not qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 90years;
  • Height≥ 185cm;
  • Cardiogenic shock;
  • Refuse to sign the written informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Changzhou Wujin People's Hospital

Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213017, China

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Lin Y, Sun X, Chen R, Liu H, Pang X, Chen J, Dong S. Feasibility and Safety of the Distal Transradial Artery for Coronary Diagnostic or Interventional Catheterization. J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Dec 9;2020:4794838. doi: 10.1155/2020/4794838. eCollection 2020.

  • Sgueglia GA, Di Giorgio A, Gaspardone A, Babunashvili A. Anatomic Basis and Physiological Rationale of Distal Radial Artery Access for Percutaneous Coronary and Endovascular Procedures. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct 22;11(20):2113-2119. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.045.

  • Sattar Y, Talib U, Faisaluddin M, Song D, Lak HM, Laghari A, Khan MZ, Ullah W, Elgendy IY, Balla S, Daggubati R, Kawsara A, Jneid H, Alraies CM, Alam M. Meta-Analysis Comparing Distal Radial Versus Traditional Radial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Angiography. Am J Cardiol. 2022 May 1;170:31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.01.019. Epub 2022 Mar 2.

  • Prasad RM, Pandrangi P, Pandrangi G, Yoo H, Salazar AM, Ukponmwan E, Kehdi M, Abela G. Meta-Analysis Comparing Distal Radial Artery Approach Versus Traditional for Coronary Procedures. Am J Cardiol. 2022 Feb 1;164:52-56. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.10.034. Epub 2021 Nov 20.

  • Pacchioni A, Mugnolo A, Sanz Sanchez J, Sgueglia GA, Pesarini G, Bellamoli M, Sacca S, Ribichini F, Reimers B, Gasparini GL. Radial artery occlusion after conventional and distal radial access: Impact of preserved flow and time-to-hemostasis in a propensity-score matching analysis of 1163 patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(3):827-835. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30005. Epub 2021 Nov 16.

  • Aminian A, Sgueglia GA, Wiemer M, Gasparini GL, Kefer J, Ruzsa Z, van Leeuwen MAH, Vandeloo B, Ungureanu C, Kedev S, Iglesias JF, Leibundgut G, Ratib K, Bernat I, Barriocanal I, Borovicanin V, Saito S. Distal versus conventional radial access for coronary angiography and intervention: Design and rationale of DISCO RADIAL study. Am Heart J. 2022 Feb;244:19-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.10.180. Epub 2021 Oct 16.

  • Li F, Shi GW, Yu XL, Song RX, Xiao JQ, Huang HM, Li LM, Zhang LY, Gong C, Cai GJ. Safety and efficacy of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via distal transradial artery access in the anatomical snuffbox: a single-centre prospective cohort study using a propensity score method. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Mar 2;22(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02518-8.

  • Shi G, Li F, Zhang L, Gong C, Xue S, Song Y, Cai G. Retrograde Recanalization of Occluded Radial Artery: A Single-Centre Experience and Literature Review. J Endovasc Ther. 2022 Oct;29(5):755-762. doi: 10.1177/15266028211067732. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

Study Officials

  • Gaojun Cai, MD

    Cardiovascular department, Changzhou Wujin People's Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
3 Months
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2022

First Posted

April 8, 2022

Study Start

March 1, 2022

Primary Completion

December 18, 2023

Study Completion

December 18, 2023

Last Updated

December 19, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations