NCT05317182

Brief Summary

To compare the accuracy of the occlusal splints made by conventional impression and milled with the splint made by intraoral scanner and milled.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 17, 2022

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 6, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 7, 2022

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 15, 2022

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

May 18, 2022

Status Verified

May 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

March 6, 2022

Last Update Submit

May 16, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Digital DentistryOcclusal recordsIntraoral scan

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Volumetric changes assessed in Root Mean Square (RMS)

    The software of automatically graphical comparisons called Geomagic® Control X (Geomagic Inc., 3D Systems Inc., USA) will be used to calculate the accuracy by measuring the distance (positive or negative) from every surface point from the initial dataset (occlusal devices before adjustment) to the final dataset (occlusal device after adjustment). This approach will give us the mean of the simple arithmetic difference.

    1 week

Study Arms (3)

Analogic-Analogic

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Occlusal splints made by conventional impression and conventional fabrication.

Other: Occlusal Splints Analogic-Analogic

Analogic-Digital

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Occlusal splints made by conventional impression and digital design and fabrication.

Other: Occlusal Splints Analogic-Digital

Digital-Digital

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Occlusal splints performed by intra-oral scanner and digital design and fabrication.

Other: Occlusal Splints Digital-Digital

Interventions

Take a conventional impression to the patient and conventional fabrication of the splint.

Analogic-Analogic

Take a conventional impression to the patient and digital fabrication of the splint.

Analogic-Digital

Take a digital impression to the patient and digital fabrication of the splint.

Digital-Digital

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients between 18 to 70 years old.
  • Patients who maintain until first molar in both arches.
  • Patients who need occlusal splints due to bruxism.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant patients.
  • Patients with removable prostheses.
  • Patients with fixed prostheses between six to six in both arches.
  • Patients with partial edentulism, do not maintain until first molar in both arches.
  • Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD): articular noises, pain on palpation, limited opening.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Blasi Clinica Dental Barcelona

Barcelona, 08021, Spain

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Blasi A, Henarejos-Domingo V, Palacios-Banuelos R, Aparicio C, Roig M. Comparison accuracy of digital and analog method using milled occlusal splints. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 Oct;35(7):1103-1112. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13039. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

Study Officials

  • Miguel Roig, DDS, PhD

    Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Model Details: This clinical study has three arms of equal size: occlusal splints made by conventional impression and conventional fabrication (Group 1), occlusal splints made by conventional impression and digital design and fabrication (Group 2), and occlusal splints performed by intra-oral scanner and digital design and fabrication (Group 3). Otherwise, the allocation of each subject to each group will be done at random by a list made with specialized software until the sample will be fulfilled when the patient is recruited.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2022

First Posted

April 7, 2022

Study Start

February 17, 2022

Primary Completion

April 15, 2022

Study Completion

April 30, 2022

Last Updated

May 18, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations