Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) Memory Support (MS) Study
Enhancing Memory and Learning in Cognitive Processing Therapy for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
2 other identifiers
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The efficacy of psychological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is likely limited by the difficulty participants have learning and remembering important therapy content. Accordingly, the present study will examine the utility of integrating a Memory Support (MS) intervention into Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT), an empirically supported and widely disseminated treatment for PTSD. MS was designed to integrate techniques aimed at facilitating encoding, consolidation, and retrieval of new learning into existing treatments, and has been shown to improve outcomes when integrated into cognitive therapy for depression. A pilot randomized controlled trial (n=52) comparing CPT with Memory Support (CPT+MS) to CPT-alone will be conducted. Study participants will be adults diagnosed with PTSD. The primary aim of the trial will be to determine if CPT+MS will lead to greater memory and learning of therapy content relative to CPT-alone, and to establish the acceptability and feasibility of integrating MS into CPT. Secondary aims include a preliminary examination of treatment efficacy, as indicated by the magnitude of changes in PTSD symptoms between conditions, and target validation, as indicated by associations between memory and learning of therapy content and treatment response. Exploratory analyses will examine several indicators of baseline memory-related cognitive functioning as predictors of memory and learning of therapy content, providing preliminary data to inform future research on personalized application of MS. Results of the trial will advance scientific knowledge about methods for optimizing memory and learning as a mechanism for improving PTSD treatment outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 25, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 4, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 4, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2027
April 1, 2026
March 1, 2026
4 years
March 25, 2022
March 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (11)
Mid-treatment Memory of therapy content assessed by the Therapy Recall Task
The Therapy Recall Task involves participants writing down as many distinct "treatment points" as they can in a 10-minute period. Treatment points are defined as insights, skills, or strategies they think are important to remember or implement as part of their therapy. Responses are scored based on the number of distinct treatment points described.
6 weeks
Post-treatment Memory of therapy content assessed by the Therapy Recall Task
The Therapy Recall Task involves participants writing down as many distinct "treatment points" as they can in a 10-minute period. Treatment points are defined as insights, skills, or strategies they think are important to remember or implement as part of their therapy. Responses are scored based on the number of distinct treatment points described.
12 weeks
Follow-up Memory of therapy content assessed by the Therapy Recall Task
The Therapy Recall Task involves participants writing down as many distinct "treatment points" as they can in a 10-minute period. Treatment points are defined as insights, skills, or strategies they think are important to remember or implement as part of their therapy. Responses are scored based on the number of distinct treatment points described.
6 months
Feasibility assessed by mean CPT Adherence
CPT adherence is defined as the portion of CPT protocol elements completed across therapy sessions, rated from 0-100%. This will be assessed via observer ratings of a random selection of 25% of tapes/session recordings from each treatment condition using the CPT Therapist Adherence and Competence Protocol - Revised. Completion of ≥ 90% mean adherence to protocol elements indicates high CPT adherence, and would be an indicator of feasibility of CPT+MS.
12 weeks
Feasibility assessed by mean CPT Competence
CPT competence will be assessed via observer ratings of a random selection of 25% of tapes/session recordings from each treatment condition of the competence with which CPT protocol elements are delivered, rated from 1 (poor) to 7 (excellent). This will be assessed via observer ratings of a random selection of session recordings using the CPT Therapist Adherence and Competence Protocol - Revised. A mean skill rating of "good" or higher (≥5 on a 7-point Likert scale) on protocol elements indicates high CPT competence, and would be an indicator of feasibility of CPT+MS.
12 weeks
Feasibility assessed by the Memory Support Rating Scale (MSRS)
The Memory Support Rating Scale (MSRS) is an an observer-rated scale used to measure the type and frequency of Memory Support strategies used. A greater number of Memory Support strategies used in the CPT+MS condition compared to CPT will indicate feasibility of CPT+MS. A random selection of 25% of tapes from each treatment condition will be assessed to derive the mean Memory Support strategies used.
12 weeks
Treatment acceptability after Session 1 assessed by the Credibility and Expectancy (CEQ) questionnaire
The CEQ is a 6-item questionnaire that assesses how credible participants think the treatment they are receiving is and how much they expect to benefit, measured after the initial treatment session. The potential range of scores is 6 to 54 and higher scores indicating greater treatment credibility/acceptability.
1 week
Mid-treatment acceptability assessed by the Working Alliance Inventory Short-Revised (WAI-R)
The WAI-R is a 12-item self-report questionnaire that measures three aspects of the therapeutic alliance: agreement on tasks, agreement on goals, and affective bond with the therapist. The potential range of scores is 12 to 60 and higher scores indicate stronger therapeutic alliance/treatment acceptability.
6 weeks
Post-treatment acceptability assessed by the Working Alliance Inventory Short-Revised (WAI-R)
The WAI-R is a 12-item self-report questionnaire that measures three aspects of the therapeutic alliance: agreement on tasks, agreement on goals, and affective bond with the therapist. The potential range of scores is 12 to 60 and higher scores indicate stronger therapeutic alliance/treatment acceptability.
12 weeks
Mid-treatment client satisfaction assessed by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ)
The CSQ is an 8-item self-report questionnaire that assesses client satisfaction with the treatment they received. The potential range of scores is 8 to 32 and higher scores suggest greater client satisfaction/treatment acceptability.
6 weeks
Post-treatment client satisfaction assessed by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ)
The CSQ is an 8-item self-report questionnaire that assesses client satisfaction with the treatment they received. The potential range of scores is 8 to 32 and higher scores suggest greater client satisfaction/treatment acceptability.
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (19)
Mid-treatment Memory of Therapy Content assessed by the Treatment Thoughts and Application Task
6 weeks
Post-treatment Memory of Therapy Content assessed by the Treatment Thoughts and Application Task
12 weeks
Follow-up Memory of Therapy Content assessed by the Treatment Thoughts and Application Task
6 months
Mid-treatment Change in Memory of Therapy Content assessed by the Generalization Task
Baseline, 6 weeks
Post-treatment Change in Memory of Therapy Content assessed by the Generalization Task
Baseline, 12 weeks
- +14 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (8)
Post-treatment Change in cognitive complaints assessed by the Cognitive Self-Report Questionnaire - Cognitive subscale (CSRQ-C)
Baseline, 12 weeks
Follow-up Change in cognitive complaints assessed by the Cognitive Self-Report Questionnaire - Cognitive subscale (CSRQ-C)
Baseline, 6 months
Post-treatment Change in PTSD-related cognitions assessed by the Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory - 9-item (PTCI-9)
Baseline, 12 weeks
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cognitive Processing Therapy + Memory Support (CPT + MS)
EXPERIMENTALCPT + MS will involve the same treatment strategies as CPT while incorporating deliberate and frequent use of memory and learning support strategies. MS strategies are designed to enhance the memory of specific treatment points, defined as any insight, skill or strategy determined to be important for the patient to remember and/or implement. MS is not designed to enhance memory functioning generally, but rather improve the encoding, consolidation and retrieval of specific components of therapeutic learning.
Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)
ACTIVE COMPARATORCPT is a manualized, trauma-focused therapy for PTSD. Treatment consists of psychoeducation on the cognitive model of PTSD, identification of trauma-related stuck points (i.e. dysfunctional beliefs), and cognitive challenging techniques to help participants identify more realistic and adaptive ways of viewing their trauma, themselves, and the world.
Interventions
CPT will be delivered over the course of 12 one-hour weekly sessions (maximum of 18 weeks to complete treatment). Participants will have the option of receiving CPT in-person or via videoconferencing.
The MS protocol consists of eight strategies: categorization, evaluation, application, cue-based reminders, practice remembering, attention recruitment, praising recall, and repetitions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Current diagnosis of PTSD as determined by the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5)
- For potential participants on psychiatric medication, dose must be stable for the past four weeks.
- Veteran status
You may not qualify if:
- Current DSM-5 diagnoses of unstable bipolar disorder, past or present psychosis, or organic mental disorder
- Active suicidal or homicidal ideation with plan or intent
- Current moderate or severe substance use disorder, as defined by DSM-5 \[i.e., at least 4 diagnostic symptoms of Substance use disorder (SUD) present\]
- Prior receipt of CPT or concurrent therapy for PTSD
- Significant cognitive impairment as indicated by a score \<10th percentile on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment
- History of moderate or severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) based on the Ohio State University TBI Identification Method and Veterans Administration/ Department of Defense (VA/DOD) guidelines
- High verbal memory ability, as indicated by a score \>1 standard deviation (SD) above the population mean on the California Verbal Learning Test® Third Edition (CVLT-3) immediate recall task
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Boston Universitylead
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)collaborator
- VA Boston Healthcare Systemcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
VA Boston Healthcare System
Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, 02130, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joseph Carpenter, PhD MA
VA Boston Healthcare System, BUSM Psychiatry Dept.
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 25, 2022
First Posted
April 4, 2022
Study Start
January 4, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2027
Last Updated
April 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share