Study Stopped
No neuropathic pain in recruited subjects
Physiopathologic Study of Induced by Thoracotomy / Thoracoscopy Neuropathy Mechanism
NITT
2 other identifiers
observational
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pulmonary surgery, performed routinely by thoracotomy or thoracoscopy, can cause significant and frequent chronic postoperative pain, most often neuropathic. The role of trauma intraoperative intercostal nerve is evoked to explain the genesis of the neuropathy. Treatments proposed in the indication of neuropathic pain in a broad sense, are exposed to many cases of failures. It is supposed that these failures are due to a mismatch between the selected drug (which is specific to the target) and the real pathology because neuropathy encompasses many different pathophysiological syndromes which are sometimes intricated. The main objective of this project is to study the clinical, psychophysical and electrophysiological (noninvasively) intercostal nerve affected by the surgery at the second postoperative month, by comparing the results with similar observations made shortly before the intervention. This study will be proposed to patients undergoing thoracotomy or thoracoscopy for partial or total lung resection in the service of Thoracic Surgery of Centre Jean Perrin, the objective is to recruit 120 patients (for 100 evaluable patients) over a period of 18 months of inclusion. The other objective of the project is to provide a treatment algorithm for patients in pain, and to compare the efficacy of this treatment with the pre-treatment observations data.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Oct 2013
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 25, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 28, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 12, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2022
CompletedApril 1, 2022
November 1, 2021
3.5 years
June 25, 2013
March 29, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (38)
Presence of spontaneous pain on the operated hemithorax
Patient interview (yes/no)
Day 0 (day of surgery)
Presence of spontaneous pain on the operated hemithorax
Patient interview (yes/no)
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Presence of spontaneous pain on the unoperated hemithorax
Patient interview (yes/no)
Day 0 (day of surgery)
Presence of spontaneous pain on the unoperated hemithorax
Patient interview (yes/no)
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Intensity of spontaneous pain on the operated hemithorax
Numeric scale of value (from 0 to 10)
Day 0 (day of surgery)
Intensity of spontaneous pain on the operated hemithorax
Numeric scale of value (from 0 to 10)
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Intensity of spontaneous pain on the unoperated hemithorax
Numeric scale of value (from 0 to 10)
Day 0 (day of surgery)
Intensity of spontaneous pain on the unoperated hemithorax
Numeric scale of value (from 0 to 10)
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Characteristics of spontaneous pain on the operated hemithorax
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) survey
Day 0 (day of surgery)
Characteristics of spontaneous pain on the operated hemithorax
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) survey
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Characteristics of spontaneous pain on the unoperated hemithorax
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) survey
Day 0 (day of surgery)
Characteristics of spontaneous pain on the unoperated hemithorax
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) survey
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of threshold sensitivity to cold on the operated hemithorax
The thermode will be applied and patients will be asked to press a button when a cold sensation will be first perceived, thus defining the thermal threshold for that stimulus presentation.
Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of threshold sensitivity to cold on the operated hemithorax
The thermode will be applied and patients will be asked to press a button when a cold sensation will be first perceived, thus defining the thermal threshold for that stimulus presentation.
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of threshold sensitivity to cold on the unoperated hemithorax
The thermode will be applied and patients will be asked to press a button when a cold sensation will be first perceived, thus defining the thermal threshold for that stimulus presentation.
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of threshold sensitivity to hot on the operated hemithorax
The thermode will be applied and patients will be asked to press a button when a hot sensation will be first perceived, thus defining the thermal threshold for that stimulus presentation.
Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of threshold sensitivity to hot on the operated hemithorax
The thermode will be applied and patients will be asked to press a button when a hot sensation will be first perceived, thus defining the thermal threshold for that stimulus presentation.
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of threshold sensitivity to hot on the unoperated hemithorax
The thermode will be applied and patients will be asked to press a button when a hot sensation will be first perceived, thus defining the thermal threshold for that stimulus presentation.
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of nociceptive threshold sensitivity to cold on the operated hemithorax
The thermode will be applied and patients will be asked to press a button when a cold painful sensation will be first perceived, thus defining the thermal nociceptive threshold for that stimulus presentation.
Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of nociceptive threshold sensitivity to cold on the operated hemithorax
The thermode will be applied and patients will be asked to press a button when a cold painful sensation will be first perceived, thus defining the thermal nociceptive threshold for that stimulus presentation.
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of nociceptive threshold sensitivity to cold on the unoperated hemithorax
The thermode will be applied and patients will be asked to press a button when a cold painful sensation will be first perceived, thus defining the thermal nociceptive threshold for that stimulus presentation.
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of nociceptive threshold sensitivity to hot on the operated hemithorax
The thermode will be applied and patients will be asked to press a button when a hot painful sensation will be first perceived, thus defining the thermal nociceptive threshold for that stimulus presentation.
Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of nociceptive threshold sensitivity to hot on the operated hemithorax
The thermode will be applied and patients will be asked to press a button when a hot painful sensation will be first perceived, thus defining the thermal nociceptive threshold for that stimulus presentation.
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of nociceptive threshold sensitivity to hot on the unoperated hemithorax
The thermode will be applied and patients will be asked to press a button when a hot painful sensation will be first perceived, thus defining the thermal nociceptive threshold for that stimulus presentation.
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of threshold tactile sensitivity on the operated hemithorax
Thickness of the 1st filament felt by the patient by application of Von Frey filaments of increasing size from 0.008 to 300 grams in pressure equivalent
Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of threshold tactile sensitivity on the operated hemithorax
Thickness of the 1st filament felt by the patient by application of Von Frey filaments of increasing size from 0.008 to 300 grams in pressure equivalent
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of threshold tactile sensitivity on the unoperated hemithorax
Thickness of the 1st filament felt by the patient by application of Von Frey filaments of increasing size from 0.008 to 300 grams in pressure equivalent
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of pressure pain threshold on the operated hemithorax
An algogenic tip is applied with increasing pressure measured in grams checked on the monitor's digital screen. The subject will be educated to signal by applying a button (sound signal) when the required sensation (beginning pain) is reached.
Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of pressure pain threshold on the operated hemithorax
An algogenic tip is applied with increasing pressure measured in grams checked on the monitor's digital screen. The subject will be educated to signal by applying a button (sound signal) when the required sensation (beginning pain) is reached.
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of pressure pain threshold on the unoperated hemithorax
An algogenic tip is applied with increasing pressure measured in grams checked on the monitor's digital screen. The subject will be educated to signal by applying a button (sound signal) when the required sensation (beginning pain) is reached.
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of the vibration sensitivity threshold on the operated hemithorax
As soon as the subject perceives the vibration of the vibrameter, the value displayed on the digital panel will be noted. The operator will then increase the intensity a little then go back down. As soon as the patient no longer feels the vibration, the value displayed on the digital panel will be noted. The vibration perception value is obtained by calculating the average of the high and low values obtained.
Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of the vibration sensitivity threshold on the operated hemithorax
As soon as the subject perceives the vibration of the vibrameter, the value displayed on the digital panel will be noted. The operator will then increase the intensity a little then go back down. As soon as the patient no longer feels the vibration, the value displayed on the digital panel will be noted. The vibration perception value is obtained by calculating the average of the high and low values obtained.
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of the vibration sensitivity threshold on the unoperated hemithorax
As soon as the subject perceives the vibration of the vibrameter, the value displayed on the digital panel will be noted. The operator will then increase the intensity a little then go back down. As soon as the patient no longer feels the vibration, the value displayed on the digital panel will be noted. The vibration perception value is obtained by calculating the average of the high and low values obtained.
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Thermographic photo of the operated hemithorax
A camera coupled with a software makes it possible to identify changes in skin temperature. The region(s) clinically identified as pathological (neuropathic) will be identified beforehand by cutaneous tags (adhesive metallic controls that have been cooled beforehand).
Day 0 (day of surgery)
Thermographic photo of the operated hemithorax
A camera coupled with a software makes it possible to identify changes in skin temperature. The region(s) clinically identified as pathological (neuropathic) will be identified beforehand by cutaneous tags (adhesive metallic controls that have been cooled beforehand).
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Thermographic photo of the unoperated hemithorax
A camera coupled with a software makes it possible to identify changes in skin temperature. The region(s) clinically identified as pathological (neuropathic) will be identified beforehand by cutaneous tags (adhesive metallic controls that have been cooled beforehand).
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of the conduction velocity in the operated hemithorax
A peripheral stimulation will be performed using a technique used in the intercostal region, and a cervical signal will be collected.
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Measurement of the conduction velocity in the unoperated hemithorax
A peripheral stimulation will be performed using a technique used in the intercostal region, and a cervical signal will be collected.
Visit 2 = 2 months after Day 0 (day of surgery)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Total or partial pneumonectomy
Day 0 (day of surgery)
Operated side
Day 0 (day of surgery)
Number of drains
Day 0 (day of surgery)
Location of drains
Day 0 (day of surgery)
Importance of rib spacing
Day 0 (day of surgery)
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
neuropathic pain
This study will be proposed to patients undergoing thoracotomy or thoracoscopy for partial or total lung resection in the service of Thoracic Surgery of Centre Jean Perrin (Prof. M. Filaire), the objective is to recruit 120 patients (for 100 evaluable patients) over a period of 18 months of inclusion
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
patients undergoing thoracotomy or thoracoscopy for partial or total lung resection
You may qualify if:
- patients undergoing lateral or posterolateral thoracotomy scheduled lung surgery, regardless of indication, or lung or pleural scheduled surgery (treatment of recurrent pneumothorax) by thoracoscopy;
- to 80 years
- Informed consent to the trial
- Protected by the French health welfare
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal of the patient;
- Preexisting neuropathy ;
- Treatment of active substance known on neuropathic pain: gabapentin, pregabalin, amitryptyline, duloxetine, venlafaxine, tricyclic antidepressants, topical lidocaine or capsaicin;
- Emergency surgery;
- Specific clinical contexts including terminal or palliative neoplasia;
- Deficit psychiatric pathology and dementia.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christian DUALE
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 25, 2013
First Posted
April 1, 2022
Study Start
October 28, 2013
Primary Completion
April 12, 2017
Study Completion
November 15, 2021
Last Updated
April 1, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-11