Lifestyle Monitoring and Coaching Using the Mobile DIAMETER Application in Secondary Care
DIAMETER-1
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a major chronic lifestyle-related disorder with a significant impact on quality and costs of care. As patients with T2DM often have insufficient knowledge about proper self-management and are insufficiently motivated for a lifestyle change, interventions with more motivational strategies and personalization are needed. The use of real-time monitoring of glucose values, nutrition and physical activity in combination with coaching aimed at lifestyle-related behavior change may improve patients' diabetes management. Therefore, ZGT, UT and RRD developed the Diameter app. The aim of phase 2 of this study is to investigate the Diameter as blended-care using a feasibility study. The primary objective of this feasibility study is to assess intervention usage and acceptability of the Diameter as a blended-care intervention in secondary care, of which some are also following a combined lifestyle intervention (GLI). Secondary objectives are to explore behavioral (e.g. physical activity), physiological (e.g. BMI), psychological (e.g. health-related quality of life) and clinical outcomes (e.g. glucose control, estimated HbA1c values). This study has a mixed-method design with 3 (regular participants) or 4 (participants who decide to follow the Combined Lifestyle Intervention (GLI) COOL next to the Diameter during the study period) data collection points. Patients will start with a two-week period of baseline measurements. Subsequently, patients will use the Diameter as a blended-care intervention for 10 weeks. The two-week measurement periods will be repeated twice (T1: week 13-14 and at T2: week 25-26). Between T1 and T2, patients will use a version of the Diameter without daily coaching messages. At T1 and T2, questionnaires will be administered, data on physical activity, food intake and glucose values will be logged, and blood and urine samples will be retrieved from regular care measurements. In addition, open-ended interviews will be performed with 10-15 patients at T1. For participants who also decided to follow the COOL program, some routinely collected measurements as part of the COOL program will be obtained from the patient record.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus-type-2
Started Jan 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus-type-2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 13, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 9, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2024
CompletedMay 14, 2024
May 1, 2024
3 years
March 9, 2022
May 10, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Intervention usage - frequency
The way in which the intervention is actually used in terms of frequency (number of time used over time)
T1 (week 13-14)
Intervention usage - duration
The way in which the intervention is actually used in terms of duration (minutes of use over time)
T1 (week 13-14)
Acceptability
Acceptability will be assessed using an UTAUT2 questionnaire of 19 questions. The UTAUT2 determinants include performance expectancy, effort expectancy, pleasure/hedonic motivation, facilitating circumstances, design, technical issues and habit. The experiences with the Diameter will be assessed using multiple statements generated by the research team according to literature and previous used UTAUT2-model based questionnaires. Each statement will be scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = extremely disagree, 7 = extremely agree) where a higher score indicate positive experiences with the Diameter. The scores will be used to calculate individual sum scores per determinant of the UTAUT2 model. Open-ended interviews will be conducted with a subset of 10-15 participation to gain in-depth information on the acceptability, and perceived barriers and facilitating conditions for usage of the Diameter.
T1 (week 13-14)
Secondary Outcomes (31)
Glucose-lowering medication usage
T0 (baseline), T1 (week 13-14), T2 (week 25-26)
T2DM-related medication usage
T0 (baseline), T1 (week 13-14), T2 (week 25-26)
Glycemic regulation - eHbA1c
T0 (baseline), T1 (week 13-14), T2 (week 25-26)
Glycemic regulation - Time In Range (TIR)
T0 (baseline), T1 (week 13-14), T2 (week 25-26)
Glycemic regulation - Time Below Range (TBR)
T0 (baseline), T1 (week 13-14), T2 (week 25-26)
- +26 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (8)
Age
T0 (baseline)
Gender
T0 (baseline)
Duration of type 2 diabetes diagnosis
T0 (baseline)
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALRegular T2DM treatment in secondary care will be complemented with the Diameter: a mobile application on smartphones that enables continuous monitoring of nutrition (via food diary), physical activity (via activity tracker Fitbit and self-reported activities) and blood glucose values (via Freestyle libre 2 sensors). The Diameter also provides autonomous lifestyle coaching via daily coaching messages, short weekly e-mails and exercises aimed at goal achievement.
Interventions
Regular T2DM treatment in secondary care will be complemented with the Diameter: a mobile application on smartphones that enables continuous monitoring of physical activity (via activity tracker Fitbit and self-reported activities) and nutrition (via food diary) and blood glucose values (via Freestyle Libre sensor). The Diameter also provides autonomous lifestyle coaching via daily coaching messages, short weekly e-mails and exercises aimed at goal achievement.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Being familiar with using a smartphone
- Being treated in ZGT hospital or primary care
You may not qualify if:
- Dependence on renal replacement therapy
- Severe general diseases or mental disorders make the participation in the study impossible
- Insufficient mastery of the Dutch language
- Other CGM device than Freestyle Libre.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Twentelead
- Ziekenhuisgroep Twentecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Ziekenhuisgroep Twente (Hospital Group Twente; ZGT)
Almelo, Overijssel, 7600 SZ, Netherlands
Related Publications (15)
van Rinsum C, Gerards S, Rutten G, Philippens N, Janssen E, Winkens B, van de Goor I, Kremers S. The Coaching on Lifestyle (CooL) Intervention for Overweight and Obesity: A Longitudinal Study into Participants' Lifestyle Changes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 4;15(4):680. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040680.
PMID: 29617337BACKGROUNDGlanz, K., B.K. Rimer, and K. VIswanath, Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice, 4th ed. Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice, 4th ed., ed. K. Glanz, B.K. Rimer, and K. Viswanath. 2008, San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass
BACKGROUNDGant, C.M., Opportunities for Improvement of Cardiovascular Risk Management in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: Integrated Assessment of Lifestyle Habits and Pharmacological Intervention in Routine Clinical Care. 2018, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
BACKGROUNDVenkatesh, V., J.Y. Thong, and X. Xu, Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly, 2012: p. 157-178.
BACKGROUNDGill, P.K.S., et al., Handgrip strength in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pakistan Journal of Physiology, 2016. 12(2): p. 19-21.
BACKGROUNDCetinus E, Buyukbese MA, Uzel M, Ekerbicer H, Karaoguz A. Hand grip strength in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005 Dec;70(3):278-86. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2005.03.028.
PMID: 15878215BACKGROUNDPalaniappan U, Cue RI, Payette H, Gray-Donald K. Implications of day-to-day variability on measurements of usual food and nutrient intakes. J Nutr. 2003 Jan;133(1):232-5. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.1.232.
PMID: 12514296BACKGROUNDBaranowski, T., 24-hour recall and diet record methods. Nutritional epidemiology, 2012. 40: p. 49-69.
BACKGROUNDHorne, R., J. Weinman, and M. Hankins, The beliefs about medicines questionnaire: the development and evaluation of a new method for assessing the cognitive representation of medication. Psychology and health, 1999. 14(1): p. 1-24.
BACKGROUNDBijl JV, Poelgeest-Eeltink AV, Shortridge-Baggett L. The psychometric properties of the diabetes management self-efficacy scale for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Adv Nurs. 1999 Aug;30(2):352-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01077.x.
PMID: 10457237BACKGROUNDRademakers J, Nijman J, van der Hoek L, Heijmans M, Rijken M. Measuring patient activation in The Netherlands: translation and validation of the American short form Patient Activation Measure (PAM13). BMC Public Health. 2012 Jul 31;12:577. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-577.
PMID: 22849664BACKGROUNDMarttila J, Nupponen R. Assessing stage of change for physical activity: how congruent are parallel methods? Health Educ Res. 2003 Aug;18(4):419-28. doi: 10.1093/her/cyf034.
PMID: 12939124BACKGROUNDHerdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
PMID: 21479777BACKGROUNDRogers, E., Diffusion of Innovations Fifth edition Free Press. 2003, New York Pp107, pp111, pp127.
BACKGROUNDFransen MP, Van Schaik TM, Twickler TB, Essink-Bot ML. Applicability of internationally available health literacy measures in the Netherlands. J Health Commun. 2011;16 Suppl 3:134-49. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.604383.
PMID: 21951248BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eclaire Hietbrink, MSc.
University of Twente
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- The primary study aim is to assess intervention usage and acceptability (e.g. effort expectancy, pleasure) regarding the Diameter integrated in regular secondary care and how acceptability is associated with intervention usage. Therefore, the study does not make use of a double blind randomized controlled trial as this design does not fit the study's primary purpose. Consequently, there will be no randomization and treatment allocation. To minimize the treatment effect at baseline, baseline measures will be blinded as much as possible, i.e., participants will not be able to get insight in their glucose values and nutrient intake. The physical activity data collected with the Fitbit cannot be blinded, so that the participants do have insight into their physical activity during the baseline measurements
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 9, 2022
First Posted
April 1, 2022
Study Start
January 13, 2022
Primary Completion
December 31, 2024
Study Completion
December 31, 2024
Last Updated
May 14, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share