NCT05307081

Brief Summary

This is a prospective, observational, consecutive, qualitative, multicenter study. Based on the available published evidence that supports patient challenges with eyedrop administration, the purpose of this video-capture study is to evaluate a more real-world population of consenting patients, regardless of age, with or without visual impairment, at routine eyecare visits. To date, no studies have been performed evaluating a real-world population consisting of daily routine eyecare clinic patients with or without visual impairment. This study will help to determine the ability to achieve success with self-administration of eyedrops in the real world.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
300

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 22, 2020

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 1, 2022

Completed
20 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 21, 2022

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

September 16, 2022

Status Verified

September 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

October 22, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 13, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion of patients who meet pre-specified "success" criteria for proper administration of eye drop onto ocular surface on first attempt session as evaluated by the ophthalmologist or optometrist grader

    Eye drop administration success = one drop accurately falling onto the ocular surface with single drop administration without the tip of the eye drop bottle touching the hands or eye (including the eyelid, conjunctiva, eyelashes)

    There will be a total of three eye drop administration attempts - Two attempts occur on the first visit (Day 0)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Proportion of patients who meet each individual failure criterion on first, second, and third attempt session

    three eye drop administration attempts - Two attempts on the first visit (Day 0) and one attempt at second visit (Day 30 +/- 7 days).

  • Proportion of patient eye drop administration "success" as evaluated by patient self-assessment on first, second, and third attempt sessions

    three eye drop administration attempts - Two attempts on the first visit (Day 0) and one attempt at second visit (Day 30 +/- 7 days).

  • Agreement between optometrist and ophthalmologist graders and patient eye drop administration "success" outcomes on first, second and third attempt sessions as measured by calculated Kappa statistic.

    three eye drop administration attempts - Two attempts on the first visit (Day 0) and one attempt at second visit (Day 30 +/- 7 days)

Study Arms (1)

1

Drug: Artificial Tears

Interventions

Artificial Tears are an FDA approved intervention

1

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Consented, routine, and real world eyecare clinic patient population, regardless of age, with or without visual impairment, willing to administer an artificial tear with video capture.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients or parents of minor patients who consent to participating in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Any patient who does not consent to study participation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Vance Thompson Vision

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57108, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Cataract Surgeons for Improved Eyecare(CSIE). Analysis of the economic impacts of dropless cataract therapy on Medicare, Medicaid, state governments, and patient costs. October 2015. http://stateofreform.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/CSIE_Dropless_Economic_Study.pdf

    RESULT
  • An JA, Kasner O, Samek DA, Levesque V. Evaluation of eyedrop administration by inexperienced patients after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Nov;40(11):1857-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.02.037. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

  • Hennessy AL, Katz J, Covert D, Kelly CA, Suan EP, Speicher MA, Sund NJ, Robin AL. A video study of drop instillation in both glaucoma and retina patients with visual impairment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Dec;152(6):982-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.05.015. Epub 2011 Aug 6.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Eye Injuries

Interventions

Lubricant Eye Drops

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Facial InjuriesCraniocerebral TraumaTrauma, Nervous SystemNervous System DiseasesEye DiseasesWounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ophthalmic SolutionsPharmaceutical SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical PreparationsTherapeutic UsesPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and UsesLubricantsSpecialty Uses of Chemicals

Central Study Contacts

Alyssa Paolini, BS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2020

First Posted

April 1, 2022

Study Start

April 21, 2022

Primary Completion

July 1, 2023

Study Completion

December 1, 2023

Last Updated

September 16, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-09

Locations