NCT05306756

Brief Summary

Pregnant women have routine monitoring of the baby's heart rate when in labour. Women with complicated pregnancies require continuous monitoring using an electronic recorder called a CTG. The CTG produces a paper based recording which is interpreted by the midwife as showing normal, suspicious or abnormal features of the baby's heart rate. Babies quite commonly demonstrate abnormal features from time to time during the course of labour. In some cases the abnormal features are of sufficient concern to warrant delivery by emergency caesarean section. In most of these cases the baby is born in good condition and the question arises whether the caesarean section was unnecessary. In order to reduce the chance of an unnecessary caesarean section additional "second-line" tests can be offered. One such test is where a small drop of blood is taken from the baby's scalp. This test involves an internal examination with an instrument to visualise the baby's head and a small scratch to the baby's scalp. The blood is tested for acid which is an indicator of whether or not the baby is receiving enough oxygen. The test is called a fetal blood sample or FBS. An alternative test is where the doctor or midwife performs a vaginal examination with two fingers and gently rubs the baby's scalp in an attempt to cause an increase in the baby's heart rate. This is a healthy response suggesting that the baby is receiving enough oxygen. The test is called digital fetal scalp stimulation or dFSS. These two "second-line" tests have never been compared in a properly conducted head-to-head comparison. This study aims to compare dFSS and FBS in a large clinical trial completed within four of Ireland's largest maternity hospitals. This trial will generate important evidence of direct relevance to clinical care and patient outcomes.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 14, 2022

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 1, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 10, 2022

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2023

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

February 20, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

March 14, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 15, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

randomised controlled trialfetal blood samplingfetal scalp stimulationcardiotocographycaesarean section

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Caesarean section (CS)

    All caesarean sections will be in labour in the context of an abnormal CTG

    at birth

Secondary Outcomes (25)

  • Caesarean section , primary indication fetal concerns

    at birth

  • Caesarean section, primary indication poor progress

    at birth

  • Caesarean section, failed attempt at assisted vaginal birth

    at birth

  • Assisted vaginal birth (AVB) (all cases)

    at birth

  • Assisted vaginal birth, primary indication fetal concerns

    at birth

  • +20 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Fetal Blood Sampling (FBS)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Fetal capillary blood samples will be collected in heparinised tubes and analysed in the delivery suite using the locally available gas analyser. The result of the first technically reliable sample, or the lowest reliable sample if multiple samples are tested, will be interpreted and acted upon according to the protocol, taking account of the clinical circumstances and the stage of labour: pH ≥7.25 normal, continue and if indicated repeat in 60 minutes; pH 7.21-7.24 borderline, repeat in 30 minutes; pH ≤ 7.20 abnormal, deliver.

Diagnostic Test: Fetal Blood Sampling (FBS)

digital Fetal Scalp Stimulation (dFSS)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The examiner will stimulate the fetal scalp digitally with the index and middle finger over a period of 30-60 seconds.The CTG will be observed over a 5-10 minutes interval after the dFSS and if a fetal heart rate acceleration (\>15 bpm for 15 seconds) is observed the test will be considered normal. If there is an episode of normal variability (5-25 bpm) but there is no clear acceleration, the test will be considered borderline. If there is no FHR acceleration and no episode of normal variability with ongoing abnormal features, the test should be interpreted as abnormal in the same way as an abnormal FBS result. FHR acceleration normal, if indicated repeat in 60 min; Uncertain acceleration/ normal variability borderline, repeat in 30 minutes; No Acceleration/ongoing abnormal features abnormal, deliver.

Diagnostic Test: digital Fetal Scalp Stimulation (dFSS)

Interventions

Vaginal examination, insert amnioscope through cervix, visualise fetal scalp, clean fetal scalp, apply ethyl chloride spray, wipe scalp with petroleum gel, small scalp scratch with sharp instrument, collect sample in heparinised capillary tube, analyse sample.

Fetal Blood Sampling (FBS)

Vaginal examination, insert one or two fingers through cervix onto fetal scalp, rub fetal scalp digitally for approximately 30-60 seconds, withdraw fingers and observe CTG for 5-10 minutes.

digital Fetal Scalp Stimulation (dFSS)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Nulliparous women
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Cephalic presentation
  • Gestational age 37+0 weeks or greater
  • Abnormal CTG that requires second-line testing (FBS or dFSS)

You may not qualify if:

  • Contraindication to FBS
  • Limited understanding of English
  • At the discretion of the responsible obstetrician in cases where there is urgency

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Coombe Women & Infants University Hospital

Dublin, D8, Ireland

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Hughes O, Murphy DJ. Comparing second-line tests to assess fetal wellbeing in Labor: a feasibility study and pilot randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Jan;35(1):91-99. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1712704. Epub 2020 Jan 12.

    PMID: 31928269BACKGROUND
  • Yambasu S, Boland F, O'Donoghue K, Curran C, Shahabuddin Y, Cotter A, Gaffney G, Devane D, Molloy EJ, Murphy DJ. Digital Foetal Scalp Stimulation Versus Foetal Blood Sampling to Assess Foetal Well-Being in Labour: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial. BJOG. 2025 Apr;132(5):557-564. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18068. Epub 2025 Jan 9.

  • Murphy DJ, Shahabuddin Y, Yambasu S, O'Donoghue K, Devane D, Cotter A, Gaffney G, Burke LA, Molloy EJ, Boland F. Digital fetal scalp stimulation (dFSS) versus fetal blood sampling (FBS) to assess fetal wellbeing in labour-a multi-centre randomised controlled trial: Fetal Intrapartum Randomised Scalp Stimulation Trial (FIRSST NCT05306756). Trials. 2022 Oct 4;23(1):848. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06794-9.

Study Officials

  • Deirdre J Murphy, MD

    Trinity College, University of Dublin

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The primary and perinatal secondary outcomes will be recorded from the computerised delivery record without knowledge of the allocation. The principal investigator will play no role in the care of the patient or assessment of outcomes.
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients in labor with CTG abnormalities that warrant second-line testing of fetal wellbeing - randomized to digital fetal scalp stimulation (dFSS) versus fetal blood sampling (FBS)
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Obstetrics

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2022

First Posted

April 1, 2022

Study Start

May 10, 2022

Primary Completion

May 1, 2023

Study Completion

August 31, 2023

Last Updated

February 20, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Subject to request to PI

Locations