Social Risk Factors and Discrimination in Cancer Survivorship

NCT05301114 | Active Not Recruiting DMC

• 1 other identifier: 4397
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 1,116
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The objective of the proposed study is to scale social risk factor screening and referral for cancer survivors and to solidify information exchange between clinical and community settings in order to improve survivor health and well-being. This will be completed through three primary aims: 1) To ascertain workflow and map community resources needed to facilitate social risk factor screening and referral for breast and prostate cancer survivors in Washington, District of Columbia. 2) To determine impact of Community Health Worker (CHW) support on Black breast and prostate cancer survivor health and wellbeing as measured through quality of life (QOL) and social connection. 3) To determine impact of anti-racism training for staff and clinicians at three cancer centers on patient-reported discrimination.

Conditions

Breast Cancer; Prostate Cancer; Health Equity; Disparities; Social Determinants of Health

Keywords

Health Equity; Community Health Worker; Social Support; Community Based Organizations; Social Determinants of Health; Breast Cancer; Prostate Cancer; Health Disparities

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

• Patient Self-Efficacy

  This study will use the following Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) self-efficacy for managing chronic conditions 4-item measures: managing daily activities, managing emotions, managing medications and treatments, and managing social interactions. The minimum score on these overall scales is a 16 and the maximum score is 80, in which a higher number represents a higher level of self-efficacy for managing chronic conditions. PROMIS raw scores are then transformed to a t-scale with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.

  6 months

• Health-related quality of life (QOL)

  QOL will be measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) 29 computer adaptive test, a collection of 4-item adaptive forms assessing physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, pain interference, as well as a single global pain item. For the 4-item forms, the lowest score is 4 and the highest score is 16. Higher scores represent higher levels of physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, pain interference, respectively. The single pain item has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10, in which a higher score represents a higher level of pain. PROMIS raw scores are then transformed to a t-scale with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.

  6 months

• Social connectedness

  To measure social connectedness, this study will draw from the item banks for the following Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) 2.0 adult item measures: Social Isolation, Emotional Support, Informational Support, and Instrumental Support. Each scale is scored with a minimum score of 4 and a maximum score of 20, in which higher scores represent higher levels of social isolation, emotional support, instrumental support, and informational support, respectively. PROMIS raw scores are then transformed to a t-scale with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.

  6 months

• Acceptability of the CHW intervention

  A four-item Likert scale will be delivered to relevant clinicians to provide feedback on acceptability of the intervention

  12 months

• Appropriateness of the CHW intervention

  A four-item Likert scale will be delivered to relevant providers to provide feedback on appropriateness of the intervention, whereby higher scores indicate greater perceived appropriateness.

  12 months

• Feasibility of the CHW intervention

  A four-item Likert scale will be delivered to relevant providers to provide feedback on feasibility of the intervention, whereby higher scores indicate greater perceived feasibility.

  12 months

• Sustainability Assessment

  This study will use the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool annually to assess environmental support, funding stability, partnerships, organizational capacity, program evaluation, program adaptation, communications and strategic planning. The minimum score for this evaluation is 0 and the maximum score is 56. A higher score represents a higher level of program sustainability. Individual categories can also be assessed with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 7 in each, in which a higher score represents higher sustainability in that category.

  12 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• Social risk factors

  3 months

Study Arms (1)

Intervention participants

EXPERIMENTAL

Among patients who completed the social needs screening as a part of standard of care, all stage I-IV Black cancer survivors will be invited to participate in a six-month community health worker intervention. The community health worker will assess social needs and provide six months of support.

Behavioral: Community Health Worker support

Interventions

Community Health Worker support BEHAVIORAL

Participant will receive weekly or monthly support (via phone or in person) from a community health worker. The community health worker will be responsible for continuously assessing the patient's social needs, providing referrals to community based organizations, and assisting with the patient's non-medical needs as they progress through survivorship (e.g. social support, referrals, etc). Individuals who identify no risk factor will receive monthly phone calls, while individuals who identify 1-3 risk factors will receive monthly home visits with interim phone calls for 6 months. Those who identify 4 or more risk factors or have intensive needs such as behavioral health will receive the same services as the medium risk group and will also be connected with the social work teams within each institution.

Intervention participants

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Diagnosis of stage I-III breast or prostate cancer and completed curative treatment (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy) or finalized treatment plan (e.g. watch and wait); OR Stage IV breast or prostate cancer approximately 6 months from diagnosis
• Black or African American race

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Medstar Health Research Institute: lead
• George Washington University: collaborator
• Howard University: collaborator
• Georgetown University: collaborator

Study Sites (1)

MedStar Washington Hospital Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

• Glasgow RE, Kwan BM, Matlock DD. Realizing the full potential of precision health: The need to include patient-reported health behavior, mental health, social determinants, and patient preferences data. J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Jun;2(3):183-185. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.31. Epub 2018 Sep 13.

  PMID: 30370072 BACKGROUND

• Clarke TC, Christ SL, Soler-Vila H, Lee DJ, Arheart KL, Prado G, Caban-Martinez A, Fleming LE. Working with cancer: health and employment among cancer survivors. Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Nov;25(11):832-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.07.011. Epub 2015 Aug 4.

  PMID: 26320705 BACKGROUND

• Weaver KE, Rowland JH, Bellizzi KM, Aziz NM. Forgoing medical care because of cost: assessing disparities in healthcare access among cancer survivors living in the United States. Cancer. 2010 Jul 15;116(14):3493-504. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25209.

  PMID: 20549763 BACKGROUND

• Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, Gershon R, Cook K, Reeve B, Ader D, Fries JF, Bruce B, Rose M; PROMIS Cooperative Group. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007 May;45(5 Suppl 1):S3-S11. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55.

  PMID: 17443116 BACKGROUND

• Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, Amtmann D, Bode R, Buysse D, Choi S, Cook K, Devellis R, DeWalt D, Fries JF, Gershon R, Hahn EA, Lai JS, Pilkonis P, Revicki D, Rose M, Weinfurt K, Hays R; PROMIS Cooperative Group. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1179-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Aug 4.

  PMID: 20685078 BACKGROUND

• Hahn EA, Devellis RF, Bode RK, Garcia SF, Castel LD, Eisen SV, Bosworth HB, Heinemann AW, Rothrock N, Cella D; PROMIS Cooperative Group. Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): item bank development and testing. Qual Life Res. 2010 Sep;19(7):1035-44. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9654-0. Epub 2010 Apr 25.

  PMID: 20419503 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms; Prostatic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by Site; Neoplasms; Breast Diseases; Skin Diseases; Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases; Genital Neoplasms, Male; Urogenital Neoplasms; Genital Diseases, Male; Genital Diseases; Urogenital Diseases; Prostatic Diseases; Male Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

• Hannah Arem, PhD

  Medstar Health Research Institute

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

• Mandi Pratt-Chapman, PhD

  George Washington University

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: NA
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
• Intervention Model: SINGLE GROUP
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: March 16, 2022
• First Posted: March 29, 2022
• Study Start: May 5, 2022
• Primary Completion (Estimated): July 20, 2026
• Study Completion (Estimated): September 30, 2026
• Last Updated: January 20, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

US (1)