MyMenoPlan: Online Resource for Improving Women's Menopause Knowledge and Informed Decision-making
MsFLASH: Living a Healthy Menopause, Aim 2 Randomized Controlled Trial of MyMenoPlan
1 other identifier
interventional
410
1 country
1
Brief Summary
As part of a National Institute on Aging -funded R01, the investigators developed an evidence-based, multi-media digital resource entitled MyMenoPlan to help women learn about the menopause transition, and the symptoms and treatments of perimenopause/menopause. MyMenoPlan is also designed to help women learn about the effectiveness of treatments for a comprehensive list of midlife symptoms and compare treatments that may help with the specific symptoms women are experiencing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 29, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 27, 2025
CompletedMarch 27, 2025
March 1, 2025
3 months
March 1, 2022
August 2, 2023
March 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Perceived Quality of Information
This 7-item, 5-point Likert scale (1- Strongly disagree to 5 - Strongly agree) is adapted from the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) in Lewis (1995). The range of this scale is 1-5. The items in this scale were averaged with a higher score meaning higher on this outcome (perceived quality of information). Items: 1. Reading the information made me feel in more control of my perimenopause/menopause. 2. The information on the website(s) was helpful to me. 3. I found the information I was looking for. 4. The information answered my questions about perimenopause/menopause. 5. I liked the website (s). 6. I would have liked more in-depth information. (reverse-coded) 7. The website(s) were fairly comprehensive about perimenopause /menopause.
Each survey question is answered after spending at least 20 minutes on the assigned website(s)
Readability
This 2-item, 5-point Likert (1- Strongly disagree to 5 - Strongly agree)scale was derived from the Standardized User Experience Percentile Rank Questionnaire (SUPR-Q) in Sauro (1995). The range of this scale is 1-5. The items in this scale were averaged with a higher score meaning higher on this outcome (readability). Items: 1. The information I read was clear. 2. The information I read was easy for me to understand.
Each survey question is answered after spending at least 20 minutes on the assigned website(s)
Self-Efficacy for Managing Menopause Symptoms
This is a newly developed Likert scale (1- Strongly disagree to 5 - Strongly agree) for assessing participants' beliefs in their own abilities in managing menopausal symptoms. The range of this scale is 1-5. The items in this scale were averaged with a higher score meaning higher on this outcome (self-efficacy). Items: 1. If I want to, I am certain I could figure out the treatments or coping strategies that would work best for me. 2. I feel I could treat or cope with my symptoms of perimenopause/menopause if I want to.
Each survey question is answered after spending at least 20 minutes on the assigned website(s)
Credibility
This 2-item, 5-point Likert (1- Strongly disagree to 5 - Strongly agree) scale was derived from the Standardized User Experience Percentile Rank Questionnaire (SUPR-Q) in Sauro (1995). The range of this scale is 1-5. The items in this scale were averaged with a higher score meaning higher on this outcome (credibility). Items: 1. The information is credible. 2. The information is trustworthy.
Each survey question is answered after spending at least 20 minutes on the assigned website(s)
Study Arms (2)
MyMenoPlan
EXPERIMENTALParticipants are asked to spend at least 20 minutes on the website (MyMenoPlan) assigned to them.
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants are asked to spend at least 20 minutes on at least one of the following websites or other websites of their choice: 1. North American Menopause Society: https://www.menopause.org/for-women 2. National Institute on Aging: https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/topics/menopause 3. The Office on Women's Health-Menopause: https://www.womenshealth.gov/menopause
Interventions
Participants are asked to spend at least 20 minutes on the website (MyMenoPlan) assigned to them.
Participants are asked to spend at least 20 minutes on at least one of the following websites: 1. North American Menopause Society: https://www.menopause.org/for-women 2. National Institute on Aging: https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/topics/menopause 3. The Office on Women's Health-Menopause: https://www.womenshealth.gov/menopause
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- As stated above
You may not qualify if:
- N/A
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UC San Diego
La Jolla, California, 92037, United States
Related Publications (1)
Snyder LB, Newton KM, Ng HX, Reed SD, Guthrie KA, Zambrano V, LaCroix AZ. Positive impact of a menopause website - MyMenoplan.org - on treatment intentions, knowledge, and decision making: A randomized controlled trial. Maturitas. 2025 Aug;199:108630. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108630. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
PMID: 40505527DERIVED
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Andrea LaCroix
- Organization
- UC San Diego
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrea Z. LaCroix, PhD
University of California, San Diego
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Distinguished Professor of Epidemiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2022
First Posted
March 29, 2022
Study Start
January 15, 2022
Primary Completion
March 31, 2022
Study Completion
March 31, 2022
Last Updated
March 27, 2025
Results First Posted
March 27, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03