Family Champions Project
Descriptive Study of the Family Champions Project
1 other identifier
interventional
1,111
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This evaluation uses a formative approach and a descriptive design with repeated measures to assess the efficacy of a Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Process to improve services delivered by the Family Champions Project (FCP). The FCP delivers education-based services-TYRO Leadership and Core Communication curricula-with funding from the Office of Family Assistance to low-income fathers and mothers to promote healthy family relationships and economic stability in their households. TYRO Leadership and Core Communication are adapted from the TYRO suite of curricula that were developed by the RIDGE Project, and they are designed to improve the relationships of families affected by the incarceration of a parent and the economic stability of their households. Participants must be at least 18 years of age with a child no older than 24 years and have no open criminal cases (cases can be deferred). Evaluation activities are carried out by Midwest Evaluation and Research (MER) and assess the extent to which our CQI Process is a feasible approach to improve outputs and the outcomes that might be associated with them for an education-based service delivery effort like the FCP. Specifically, study results from formative evaluation will inform practitioners in the field of HMRE about the viability of using a CQI Process like ours to achieve full implementation and provide some evidence about its capacity to improve outcomes. Formative evaluation not only assesses experiences of the CQI Team and front-line service staff while implementing our CQI Process, but also pays attention to the timing and other specifics of any performance interventions that occur over the 5-year project. As a result, performance interventions present opportunities to conduct a series of mini studies to descriptively evaluate CQI Team efforts to improve implementation of the FCP. Performance trends that improve after an intervention indicate the CQI Team was likely successful to more fully implement outputs which should result in a positive effect on retention rates and, in turn, short term outcomes if we assume a sound theory of change for the FCP is depicted in the logic model.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 28, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 28, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 29, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 21, 2025
CompletedNovember 21, 2025
November 1, 2025
4 years
February 28, 2022
September 16, 2025
November 11, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary Outcome Measure 1: Retention Rates Among Participants
Do FCP participants exhibit higher retention rates (i.e., completion %) after cycles of CQI? • Measured by program status (% active, complete, or not in program) as recorded on the nFORM online data collection system whose use is required by the funder to track programmatic data, such as enrollment and participation levels. Count of participants who dropped out before CQI efforts began was obtained Count of participants who dropped out after CQI efforts began was obtained Count of participant completions before CQI efforts began was obtained Count of participant completions after CQI efforts began was obtained
through study completion, an average of six weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Secondary Outcome Measure 1: Partner Relationship Attitudes
pre to post completion which is 6 weeks longs
Study Arms (1)
Primary Workshop Sessions
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive 18 total workshop hours; TYRO Leadership curriculum in 6 2-hour weekly sessions for a subtotal of 12 hours, and Core Communication curriculum in 1-3 sessions for a subtotal of 6 hours.
Interventions
Primary Services: participants receive 12 hours of TYRO Leadership curricula, 6 hours of Core Communication curricula. Support Services (optional): participants choose from a menu of classes (1-3 hours) at the walk-in mini clinic to meet a variety of self-identified needs.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult (age 18 and older)
- Parent
- No open criminal cases (or deferred)
You may not qualify if:
- Minor (under the age of 18)
- Not a parent
- Has an open criminal case (or not deferred)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Midwest Evaluation & Researchlead
- Anthem Strong Familiescollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Anthem Strong Families
Dallas, Texas, 75254, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Matthew Shepherd
- Organization
- Midwest Evaluation and Research
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matt D Shepherd, PhD
Midwest Evaluation & Research
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 28, 2022
First Posted
March 28, 2022
Study Start
April 1, 2021
Primary Completion
April 1, 2025
Study Completion
August 29, 2025
Last Updated
November 21, 2025
Results First Posted
November 21, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
All participant data will be confidential and aggregated. No individual participant data will be released unless requested by the courts. This study looks at data as a whole.