NCT05298345

Brief Summary

This evaluation uses a formative approach and a descriptive design with repeated measures to assess the efficacy of a Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Process to improve services delivered by the Family Champions Project (FCP). The FCP delivers education-based services-TYRO Leadership and Core Communication curricula-with funding from the Office of Family Assistance to low-income fathers and mothers to promote healthy family relationships and economic stability in their households. TYRO Leadership and Core Communication are adapted from the TYRO suite of curricula that were developed by the RIDGE Project, and they are designed to improve the relationships of families affected by the incarceration of a parent and the economic stability of their households. Participants must be at least 18 years of age with a child no older than 24 years and have no open criminal cases (cases can be deferred). Evaluation activities are carried out by Midwest Evaluation and Research (MER) and assess the extent to which our CQI Process is a feasible approach to improve outputs and the outcomes that might be associated with them for an education-based service delivery effort like the FCP. Specifically, study results from formative evaluation will inform practitioners in the field of HMRE about the viability of using a CQI Process like ours to achieve full implementation and provide some evidence about its capacity to improve outcomes. Formative evaluation not only assesses experiences of the CQI Team and front-line service staff while implementing our CQI Process, but also pays attention to the timing and other specifics of any performance interventions that occur over the 5-year project. As a result, performance interventions present opportunities to conduct a series of mini studies to descriptively evaluate CQI Team efforts to improve implementation of the FCP. Performance trends that improve after an intervention indicate the CQI Team was likely successful to more fully implement outputs which should result in a positive effect on retention rates and, in turn, short term outcomes if we assume a sound theory of change for the FCP is depicted in the logic model.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,111

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2021

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 28, 2022

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 28, 2022

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 29, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 21, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

November 21, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

February 28, 2022

Results QC Date

September 16, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 11, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Primary Outcome Measure 1: Retention Rates Among Participants

    Do FCP participants exhibit higher retention rates (i.e., completion %) after cycles of CQI? • Measured by program status (% active, complete, or not in program) as recorded on the nFORM online data collection system whose use is required by the funder to track programmatic data, such as enrollment and participation levels. Count of participants who dropped out before CQI efforts began was obtained Count of participants who dropped out after CQI efforts began was obtained Count of participant completions before CQI efforts began was obtained Count of participant completions after CQI efforts began was obtained

    through study completion, an average of six weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Secondary Outcome Measure 1: Partner Relationship Attitudes

    pre to post completion which is 6 weeks longs

Study Arms (1)

Primary Workshop Sessions

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants receive 18 total workshop hours; TYRO Leadership curriculum in 6 2-hour weekly sessions for a subtotal of 12 hours, and Core Communication curriculum in 1-3 sessions for a subtotal of 6 hours.

Other: Family Champions Project Primary Services

Interventions

Primary Services: participants receive 12 hours of TYRO Leadership curricula, 6 hours of Core Communication curricula. Support Services (optional): participants choose from a menu of classes (1-3 hours) at the walk-in mini clinic to meet a variety of self-identified needs.

Primary Workshop Sessions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult (age 18 and older)
  • Parent
  • No open criminal cases (or deferred)

You may not qualify if:

  • Minor (under the age of 18)
  • Not a parent
  • Has an open criminal case (or not deferred)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Anthem Strong Families

Dallas, Texas, 75254, United States

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Matthew Shepherd
Organization
Midwest Evaluation and Research

Study Officials

  • Matt D Shepherd, PhD

    Midwest Evaluation & Research

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2022

First Posted

March 28, 2022

Study Start

April 1, 2021

Primary Completion

April 1, 2025

Study Completion

August 29, 2025

Last Updated

November 21, 2025

Results First Posted

November 21, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

All participant data will be confidential and aggregated. No individual participant data will be released unless requested by the courts. This study looks at data as a whole.

Locations