Quantra vs TEG for Congenital Cardiac Surgery - a Pilot Validation Study
Comparison of the Point-of-care Coagulation Device Quantra With the TEG for Congenital Cardiac Surgery - a Pilot Validation Study
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Congenital heart surgery on cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with impacted coagulation quality and increased bleeding after separation of CPB. The current testing device used at our institution is the "TEG 5000" (Haemonetics Corporation). The novel coagulation testing device "Quantra System" (Hemosonics) has favorable properties (result within 20 minutes) allowing for a quicker identification of the coagulation problem and hence faster administration of the correct coagulation products, potentially leading to better coagulation quality and possibly reducing the need of additional blood products. The aim of this prospective observational (non-interventional, investigational only) quality improvement study is to investigate if the Quantra is reliable and valid in predicting the coagulation status when compared with our standard-of-care device TEG 5000.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Oct 2022
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 28, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 25, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 13, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 25, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 25, 2023
CompletedMay 13, 2025
May 1, 2025
7 months
February 28, 2022
May 7, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Correlation Quantra vs TEG_Fibrinogen_Function1
Correlation/Linear regression/normal\_vs\_abnormal of Quantra (FCS) with TEG (K time \& alpha angle)
30 minutes during anesthesia, prior to separation from CPB
Correlation Quantra vs TEG_Fibrinogen_Function1
Correlation/Linear regression/normal\_vs\_abnormal of Quantra (FCS) with TEG (K time \& alpha angle)
30 minutes during anesthesia, after coagulation products were given
Correlation Quantra vs TEG_Fibrinogen_Function2
Correlation/Linear regression/normal\_vs\_abnormal of Quantra (FCS) with Clauss Fibrinogen.
30 minutes during anesthesia, prior to separation from CPB
Correlation Quantra vs TEG_Fibrinogen_Function2
Correlation/Linear regression/normal\_vs\_abnormal of Quantra (FCS) with Clauss Fibrinogen.
30 minutes during anesthesia, after coagulation products were given
Correlation Quantra vs TEG_Platelet_Function
Correlation/Linear regression/normal\_vs\_abnormal of Quantra (CS/PCS) with TEG (MA)
30 minutes during anesthesia, prior to separation from CPB
Correlation Quantra vs TEG_Platelet_Function
Correlation/Linear regression/normal\_vs\_abnormal of Quantra (CS/PCS) with TEG (MA)
30 minutes during anesthesia, after coagulation products were given
Correlation Quantra vs TEG_clot initiation
Correlation/Linear regression/normal\_vs\_abnormal of Quantra (CT/CTH) with TEG (R time)
30 minutes during anesthesia, prior to separation from CPB
Correlation Quantra vs TEG_clot initiation
Correlation/Linear regression/normal\_vs\_abnormal of Quantra (CT/CTH) with TEG (R time)
30 minutes during anesthesia, after coagulation products were given
Correlation Quantra vs TEG_clot strength/firmness
Correlation/Linear regression/normal\_vs\_abnormal of Quantra (CS) with TEG (G value)
30 minutes during anesthesia, prior to separation from CPB
Correlation Quantra vs TEG_clot strength/firmness
Correlation/Linear regression/normal\_vs\_abnormal of Quantra (CS) with TEG (G value)
30 minutes during anesthesia, after coagulation products were given
Interventions
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy/reliability/validity of the Quantra device in patients with congenital heart disease for cardiac surgery on CPB. The study if of investigational interest only. No clinical decisions will be made based on the results obtained by the Quantra device.
Eligibility Criteria
All patients with congenital heart disease scheduled for cardiac surgery on cardio-pulmonary bypass at our institution Age range is 0 to 8 years. There are no enrollment restrictions related to gender or ethnic background.
You may qualify if:
- All cases with hypothermia (\<=30C)
You may not qualify if:
- Neonatal/Infant Bloodless surgery
- Bodyweight under 3kg
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, 94305, United States
Related Publications (1)
Ochocinski D, Navaratnam M, Babb A, De Souza E, Kamra K, Sleasman JR, Margetson TD, Bhamidipati JK, Ramamoorthy C, Schmidt AR. Comparison of the Point-Of-Care Coagulation Device Quantra With the TEG-5000 for Congenital Cardiac Surgery-A Pilot Study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2025 Jun;35(6):469-480. doi: 10.1111/pan.15097. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
PMID: 40095320RESULT
Biospecimen
2 x 2.7mL of full blood for coagulation testing with the Quantra System. Blood samples will not be stored or used for other testing.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexander R Schmidt, MD
Stanford University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 28, 2022
First Posted
March 25, 2022
Study Start
October 13, 2022
Primary Completion
May 25, 2023
Study Completion
May 25, 2023
Last Updated
May 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share