Evaluation of the Course Format "NASIM25"
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators intend to evauate the development and professional safety of aspiring prehospital emergency pyhsicians in a cross sectional and longitudinal modality. This compass objecitve and subjective evaluable professional skills essential in prehospital emergency medicine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 6, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 25, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 25, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 7, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 24, 2023
CompletedNovember 15, 2023
November 1, 2023
12 months
March 6, 2022
November 14, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Influence on applying the ABCDE-Approach and non-technical skills
The investigators use a 33 item compassing checklist to quantify the ABCDE approach according to Peran et al. 2020 (Peran et al. ABCDE cognitive aid tool in patient assessment - development and validation in a multicenter pilot simulation study. BMC Emerg Med. 2020;20(1):95.) and a 7 items compassing Ottawa Global scale to quantify the non-technical skills concerning CRM according to Kim et al. 2009 (Kim et al. A comparison of global rating scale and checklist scores in the validation of an evaluation tool to assess performance in the resuscitation of critically ill patients during simulat-ed emergencies (abbreviated as "CRM simulator study IB"). Simul Healthc. 2009;4(1):6-16.). Further details are cited in the study description -\> Detailed description
3 Days
Influence on self- and external assessement
The investigators use school marks (1=best, 6=worst) to quantify the global performance of the participants to rate the performance at the end of each scenario within the course for external assessment and the same school marks as an internal self-assessment given by the participants. Further details are cited in the study description -\> Detailed description
3 Days
Influence on the professional safety
The investigators use a self-designed questionnair compassing 25 diseases. Every participant has to self-assess the own capability to handle each of the diseases in a 10 items likert scale (1: very unsafe in handling, 10: very safe in handling) over the points in time: before the course, after the course and after an additional time frame after the course.
1 Year
Eligibility Criteria
physicians that are aspiring the qualification: "prehospital emergency physician"
You may qualify if:
- physician aspiring the qualification: "prehospital emergency physician" and participating in the course: NASIM25
You may not qualify if:
- not participating in the course NASIM25
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Centre Mainz
Mainz, RLP, 55131, Germany
Related Publications (2)
Peran D, Kodet J, Pekara J, Mala L, Truhlar A, Cmorej PC, Lauridsen KG, Sari F, Sykora R. ABCDE cognitive aid tool in patient assessment - development and validation in a multicenter pilot simulation study. BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Dec 4;20(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00390-3.
PMID: 33276731RESULTKim J, Neilipovitz D, Cardinal P, Chiu M. A comparison of global rating scale and checklist scores in the validation of an evaluation tool to assess performance in the resuscitation of critically ill patients during simulated emergencies (abbreviated as "CRM simulator study IB"). Simul Healthc. 2009 Spring;4(1):6-16. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181880472.
PMID: 19212245RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ott Thomas, M.D.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Thomas Ott, M.D., Principal Investigator, Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Center
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 6, 2022
First Posted
March 25, 2022
Study Start
March 25, 2022
Primary Completion
March 7, 2023
Study Completion
May 24, 2023
Last Updated
November 15, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share