NCT05294159

Brief Summary

This is a 12-month, dual arm, phase 4, open-label, multi-centre study examining the implementation of LA intra-muscular (IM) drugs in clinics and decentralised community-based settings in the UK.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
114

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

6 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 22, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 24, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 18, 2022

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 22, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 22, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

July 8, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

February 22, 2022

Last Update Submit

July 4, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

HIV-1Long-acting antiviralsImplementation science

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion of participants that agree or completely agree (average score of 4 or higher) on the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) (a validated method)

    To evaluate feasibility of CAB and RPV LA administration at clinics in England and community based settings by patients

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Proportion of care provider and nurse participants that agree or completely agree (average score of 4 or higher) on the FIM and via qualitative interviews

    At Day 0, 4 Months and 12 Months

  • Proportion of care provider and nurse participants that agree or completely agree (average score of 4 or higher) Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) (a validated method)

    At Day 0, 4 Months and 12 Months

  • Proportion of community site representatives that agree or completely agree (average score of 4 or higher) score of on the FIM and AIM with in-depth qualitative interviews with community site representative

    At 8 months and 12 months

  • Proportion of injections occurring within target window from target date (± 7 days of target date)

    12 months

  • Proportion of injections occurring after target window with/without use of oral ART

    12 months

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (5)

  • Incidence of CAB and RPV LA related ADRs (adverse drug reactions) and all SAEs

    12 months

  • Proportion of participants who do not progress to injections/discontinuation during oral lead in

    12 months

  • Proportion of participants who discontinue CAB and RPV LA, for all cause, virological reasons or tolerability

    12 months

  • +2 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Clinic-based PLH on CAB+RPV LA

All PWH participants will begin injections in the clinic setting in Phase 1. During Phase 1, PWH participants are screened and consented to participate in the study. During the screening phase, potential participants will be asked to identify their preferred location for phase 2 (decentralised site) and the reason for their preference. At the time of consent, patients will select their injection setting for Phase 2. Patients can select their preferred choice of setting until the 50 in-clinic numbers and 100 decentralised site places have been reached. After this, PWH participants will be allocated to the setting yet to reach its cap. In Phase 2, PWH participants will either continue to receive injection in clinic or receive injections from community nurses or clinic nurses at decentralised sites.

Other: The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) and Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

Community-based PLH on CAB+RPV LA

All PWH participants will begin injections in the clinic setting in Phase 1. During Phase 1, PWH participants are screened and consented to participate in the study. During the screening phase, potential participants will be asked to identify their preferred location for phase 2 (decentralised site) and the reason for their preference. At the time of consent, patients will select their injection setting for Phase 2. Patients can select their preferred choice of setting until the 50 in-clinic numbers and 100 decentralised site places have been reached. After this, PWH participants will be allocated to the setting yet to reach its cap. In Phase 2, PWH participants will either continue to receive injection in clinic or receive injections from community nurses or clinic nurses at decentralised sites.

Other: The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) and Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

Interventions

The Feasibility and Acceptability of Intervention Measure (FIM and AIM) are used to evaluate the feasibilit and acceptability of our implementation strategies. The FIM and AIM is a validated implementation outcome measure where higher scores indicate greater feasibility and acceptability

Clinic-based PLH on CAB+RPV LACommunity-based PLH on CAB+RPV LA

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

108 stable, virally suppressed PWH. To achieve representation of underrepresented groups in HIV studies, a cap will be set on recruitment of men at 50%, white participants at 50% and age under 50y at 70%.

You may qualify if:

  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Documented HIV-1 infection
  • Virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA \<50 copies/ml) on a stable antiretroviral regimen
  • No hepatitis B
  • In accordance with EU license and NICE guidance

You may not qualify if:

  • Based on contraindication for CAB LA, RPV LA, in accordance with EU license and NICE guidance
  • Prior virologic failure on substances of NNRTI or INI class
  • Resistance mutations to any substance of the NNRTI or INI class
  • Prior exposure to CAB + RPV LA

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (6)

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust

Brighton, BN2 1DH, United Kingdom

Location

Royal Liverpool University Hospital

Liverpool, L7 8XP, United Kingdom

Location

Blizard Institute

London, E1 2AT, United Kingdom

Location

Royal Free Hospital NHS

London, NW3 2QG, United Kingdom

Location

Guys' and St Thomas' NHS Trust

London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom

Location

Chelsea & Westminster NHS Foundation Trust

London, SW10 9NH, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 7;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.

  • Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.

  • Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.

  • Orkin C, Hayes R, Haviland J, Wong YL, Ring K, Apea V, Kasadha B, Clarke E, Byrne R, Fox J, Barber TJ, Clarke A, Paparini S. Perspectives of People With HIV on Implementing Long-acting Cabotegravir Plus Rilpivirine in Clinics and Community Settings in the United Kingdom: Results From the Antisexist, Antiracist, Antiageist Implementing Long-acting Novel Antiretrovirals Study. Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Jun 4;80(5):1103-1113. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae523.

  • Farooq HZ, Apea V, Kasadha B, Ullah S, Hilton-Smith G, Haley A, Scherzer J, Hand J, Paparini S, Phillips R, Orkin CM. Study protocol: the ILANA study - exploring optimal implementation strategies for long-acting antiretroviral therapy to ensure equity in clinical care and policy for women, racially minoritised people and older people living with HIV in the UK - a qualitative multiphase longitudinal study design. BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 9;13(7):e070666. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070666.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

HIV InfectionsBlood-Borne InfectionsCommunicable DiseasesInfectionsSexually Transmitted Diseases, ViralSexually Transmitted DiseasesLentivirus InfectionsRetroviridae InfectionsRNA Virus InfectionsVirus DiseasesSlow Virus DiseasesGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesImmune System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Chloe Orkin

    QMUL

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2022

First Posted

March 24, 2022

Study Start

July 18, 2022

Primary Completion

December 22, 2023

Study Completion

December 22, 2023

Last Updated

July 8, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Locations