NCT05292651

Brief Summary

The primary objective is to evaluate whether a standard pre- and postdilatation (PSP strategy) of the modern DES results in a more optimal stent implantation compared to DS as evaluated by OCT in patients with stable coronary artery disease. The secondary clinical objective is to evaluate clinical cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease treated with the PSP strategy.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
248

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease

Timeline
40mo left

Started Sep 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress53%
Sep 2022Sep 2029

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 2, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 23, 2022

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2022

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2027

Expected
2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2029

Last Updated

February 1, 2024

Status Verified

January 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

December 2, 2021

Last Update Submit

January 30, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Suboptimal stent results which is defined as a composite of major stent underexpansion and major edge dissection measured by OCT at lesion level directly after completion of the stent implantation according to the protocol

    Stent malapposition (categorical variable) is defined as: * Unacceptable stent expansion: The minimal stent area (MSA) of the proximal segment is \<90% of the proximal lumen area, and/or the MSA of the distal segment is \<90% of the distal reference lumen area on OCT OR * Presence of incompletely apposed stent struts on OCT more than 3mm long (defined as stent struts clearly separated from the vessel wall (lumen border/plaque border) without any tissue behind the struts with a distance from the adjacent intima of ≥0.2 mm and not associated with any side branch: i.e. the Prati criterium) Edge dissections (categorical variable) will be presented as: • Dissections on OCT of ≥60 degrees of the circumference of the vessel at the site of dissection and ≥3 mm in length

    During procedure

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Minimal stent area (MSA) (mm^2)

    During procedure

  • Acute recoil (percent)

    During procedure

  • Stent malapposition (percent)

    During procedure

  • Mean stent expansion (percent):

    During procedure

  • Intra-stent plaque protrusion and thrombus

    During procedure

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

PSP technique

EXPERIMENTAL

The definitions of the PSP technique are: * Predilatation is mandatory with a balloon diameter equal to or maximally 0.5 mm less than the distal reference vessel diameter. We hypothesize that this lesion preparation and fracture of the calcium may result in better stent apposition, less recoil and higher minimal stent area (MSA) Also see endpoints. * The DES should be deployed at 2 atm. above the nominal pressure. This relatively low stent deployment pressure may prevent stent edge dissections. * The postdilatation is mandatory with a shorter length and (at least 0.25mm) larger diameter non-compliant balloon at 16 atm. The apposition, minimal stent area (MSA) and recoil may improve with this large, high pressure postdilatation. The slightly shorter balloon can prevent edge dissections.

Procedure: PCI

Direct Stenting

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

• The DES is directly placed without any lesion preparation and deployed at a pressure at the discretion of the operator. Ideally a pressure would be achieved in which angiographic expansion of the DES is complete (without significant dog-boning)

Procedure: PCI

Interventions

PCIPROCEDURE

percutaneous coronary intervention

Direct StentingPSP technique

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Stable angina patients or acute coronary syndrome patients with bystander stable coronary artery disease
  • With one or more significant epicardial stenosis in native coronary arteries suitable for direct stenting, according to the judgement of treating operator.
  • The use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) or resting indices like iFR and RFR to assess lesion severity is encouraged.
  • Subject must be at least 18 years of age
  • Written consent to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Lesions not suitable for direct stenting, like (sub)-total stenosis, severely calcified lesions
  • Culprit lesions of acute coronary syndrome cannot be randomized to the trial. After successful treatment of the ACS culprit lesion, patients however can be randomized in the trial in case of remaining stable non-culprit lesions that thought to be stented directly of during a staged procedure.
  • Lesions not suitable for OCT catheter delivery and imaging, e.g. left main or ostial right coronary artery stenosis, lesions in coronary bypass grafts or tortuous anatomy
  • Treatment for in-stent restenosis
  • Bifurcation lesions in which a two-stent technique or a proximal postdilatation is planned.
  • Treatment of coronary artery bypass grafts
  • Creatine Clearance ≤ 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 (as calculated by MDRD formula for estimated GFR)
  • Known hypersensitivity or allergy for cobalt chromium
  • Known comorbidity associated with a life expectancy \< 1 year
  • Unable to understand and follow study-related instructions or unable to comply with study protocol

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Albert Schweitzer hospital

Dordrecht, Netherlands

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Rohit Oemrawsingh, MD, PhD

    Albert Schweitzer Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Selina Vlieger, MSc

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: single-center, prospective, single blinded randomized clinical trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2021

First Posted

March 23, 2022

Study Start

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2029

Last Updated

February 1, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations