Optimal Stent Deployment Strategy of Contemporary Stents
PERFECTPSP
OPtimal stEnt Deployment stRategy oF Contemporary sTents
1 other identifier
interventional
248
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective is to evaluate whether a standard pre- and postdilatation (PSP strategy) of the modern DES results in a more optimal stent implantation compared to DS as evaluated by OCT in patients with stable coronary artery disease. The secondary clinical objective is to evaluate clinical cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease treated with the PSP strategy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Sep 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 2, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 23, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2029
February 1, 2024
January 1, 2024
5 years
December 2, 2021
January 30, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Suboptimal stent results which is defined as a composite of major stent underexpansion and major edge dissection measured by OCT at lesion level directly after completion of the stent implantation according to the protocol
Stent malapposition (categorical variable) is defined as: * Unacceptable stent expansion: The minimal stent area (MSA) of the proximal segment is \<90% of the proximal lumen area, and/or the MSA of the distal segment is \<90% of the distal reference lumen area on OCT OR * Presence of incompletely apposed stent struts on OCT more than 3mm long (defined as stent struts clearly separated from the vessel wall (lumen border/plaque border) without any tissue behind the struts with a distance from the adjacent intima of ≥0.2 mm and not associated with any side branch: i.e. the Prati criterium) Edge dissections (categorical variable) will be presented as: • Dissections on OCT of ≥60 degrees of the circumference of the vessel at the site of dissection and ≥3 mm in length
During procedure
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Minimal stent area (MSA) (mm^2)
During procedure
Acute recoil (percent)
During procedure
Stent malapposition (percent)
During procedure
Mean stent expansion (percent):
During procedure
Intra-stent plaque protrusion and thrombus
During procedure
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
PSP technique
EXPERIMENTALThe definitions of the PSP technique are: * Predilatation is mandatory with a balloon diameter equal to or maximally 0.5 mm less than the distal reference vessel diameter. We hypothesize that this lesion preparation and fracture of the calcium may result in better stent apposition, less recoil and higher minimal stent area (MSA) Also see endpoints. * The DES should be deployed at 2 atm. above the nominal pressure. This relatively low stent deployment pressure may prevent stent edge dissections. * The postdilatation is mandatory with a shorter length and (at least 0.25mm) larger diameter non-compliant balloon at 16 atm. The apposition, minimal stent area (MSA) and recoil may improve with this large, high pressure postdilatation. The slightly shorter balloon can prevent edge dissections.
Direct Stenting
ACTIVE COMPARATOR• The DES is directly placed without any lesion preparation and deployed at a pressure at the discretion of the operator. Ideally a pressure would be achieved in which angiographic expansion of the DES is complete (without significant dog-boning)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Stable angina patients or acute coronary syndrome patients with bystander stable coronary artery disease
- With one or more significant epicardial stenosis in native coronary arteries suitable for direct stenting, according to the judgement of treating operator.
- The use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) or resting indices like iFR and RFR to assess lesion severity is encouraged.
- Subject must be at least 18 years of age
- Written consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Lesions not suitable for direct stenting, like (sub)-total stenosis, severely calcified lesions
- Culprit lesions of acute coronary syndrome cannot be randomized to the trial. After successful treatment of the ACS culprit lesion, patients however can be randomized in the trial in case of remaining stable non-culprit lesions that thought to be stented directly of during a staged procedure.
- Lesions not suitable for OCT catheter delivery and imaging, e.g. left main or ostial right coronary artery stenosis, lesions in coronary bypass grafts or tortuous anatomy
- Treatment for in-stent restenosis
- Bifurcation lesions in which a two-stent technique or a proximal postdilatation is planned.
- Treatment of coronary artery bypass grafts
- Creatine Clearance ≤ 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 (as calculated by MDRD formula for estimated GFR)
- Known hypersensitivity or allergy for cobalt chromium
- Known comorbidity associated with a life expectancy \< 1 year
- Unable to understand and follow study-related instructions or unable to comply with study protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Albert Schweitzer hospital
Dordrecht, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rohit Oemrawsingh, MD, PhD
Albert Schweitzer Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 2, 2021
First Posted
March 23, 2022
Study Start
September 1, 2022
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2029
Last Updated
February 1, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share