Quality of Life Intervention to Inform Patient Decision-Making in Early-Stage Lung Cancer
Utilizing Patient Reported Quality of Life to Inform Patient Decision Making in Early-Stage Lung Cancer
2 other identifiers
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical trial studies the effect of a quality of life intervention on decision-making in patients with early-stage lung cancer who are undergoing standard of care surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Providing quality of life outcome data to patients deciding between surgery and SBRT may help decrease decision regret and increase patient satisfaction with their care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 23, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 21, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 21, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 21, 2028
October 20, 2025
October 1, 2025
5 years
March 3, 2022
October 16, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Decision regret
Compare the extent of decision regret based on Decision Regret Scale between the provision of quality of life (QOL) information versus usual care for standard of care surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment. The five-point decision regret score will be converted to a 100-point score as described by others, where a higher score reflects an increased decision regret. In this schema, a decision regret score \> 25 % is deemed moderate to severe regret. The dichotomized decision regret will be modeled as a function of group, time, and their interaction using a generalized estimating equations (GEE) logistic regression model with an autoregressive covariance structure. The rates of less than moderate to severe regret will be compared between groups at 6-months using a one-sided test about the appropriate contrast of model estimates.
At 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Up to 6 months
Quality of Life (QOL)
Up to 6 months
Difference in consideration of regret
Up to 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Group A (QOL fact sheet)
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive study QOL intervention fact sheet during the initial consult that occurs 4 weeks prior to the standard of care surgery or SBRT. Patients have an opportunity to review the QOL fact sheet in person and discuss any questions with the treating physician(s).
Group B (usual care)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive usual care during the initial consult that occurs 4 weeks prior to the standard of care surgery or SBRT.
Interventions
Receive usual care
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \>= 18 years
- Radiographic stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
- Of note, separate tumor nodule(s) in an ipsilateral lobe different from that of the primary is considered T4 disease. However, these are treated as separate stage I or II lesions and will be eligible for this study.
- Eligible for both surgery and SBRT
- Able to provide informed consent in English
- Have verbal fluency in English
- Participant must understand the investigational nature of this study and sign an Independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board approved written informed consent form prior to receiving any study related procedure
You may not qualify if:
- Radiographic stage III-IV NSCLC except as noted above
- Eligible for either only surgery or SBRT, but not both
- Eligible for palliative-intent treatments or supportive care only.
- Pregnant female participants.
- Unwilling or unable to follow protocol requirements
- Any condition which in the investigator's opinion deems the participant an unsuitable candidate
- Cognitively impaired adults/adults with impaired decision-making capacity
- Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers)
- Prisoners
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anurag K Singh
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2022
First Posted
March 23, 2022
Study Start
December 21, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 21, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 21, 2028
Last Updated
October 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10