NCT05287919

Brief Summary

Background: Low-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) attenuates the loss of muscle mass of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients. However, it has been shown that medium-frequency NMES may be better than low-frequency for the maintenance of skeletal muscle mass in healthy subjects. Objective: to compare the effects of low-frequency and medium-frequency NMES, along with a standard physical therapy (SPT) programme, on the attenuation of skeletal muscle atrophy in critically ill patients. Methods: Fifty-four critically ill patients admitted into intensive care unit (ICU) and on mechanical ventilation (MV) participated in this randomized, single-blinded, experimental study. Participants were allocated to one of the following groups: Control Group (CG), received a standard lower limb physical therapy (SPT) programme, 2x/day; Low-frequency NMES Group (LFG), received lower limb SPT+NMES at 100 Hz, 2x/day; and Medium-frequency NMES Group (MFG), received lower limb SPT+NMES at 100 Hz and carrier frequency of 2500 Hz, 2x/day. The primary outcome was the thickness and quality of the quadriceps muscle, evaluated with ultrasonography while patients were in ICU. Secondary outcomes, assessed at various stages of recovery, were strength, functionality, independence for activities of daily living, quality of life, and total days hospitalized.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
54

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2019

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 31, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 31, 2020

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 19, 2022

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 18, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 18, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

February 19, 2022

Last Update Submit

March 9, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

electrical stimulation therapyskeletal muscle atrophycritically ill patientphysical therapyintensive care unit

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in thickness of the quadriceps muscle, evaluated with ultrasonography while patients were in intensive critical unit (ICU).

    Thickness of the quadriceps muscle via ultrasonography (mm).

    Day 1, Day 5, Day 9

  • Change in quality of the quadriceps muscle, evaluated with ultrasonography while patients were in intensive critical unit (ICU).

    Quality of the quadriceps muscle via ultrasonography by Heckmatt's rating scale. Muscle quality was estimated by Heckmatt's rating scale, which scores the ultrasound images between 1-4: 1) normal echogenicity; 2) slight increase in muscle echogenicity and normal bone reflection; 3) moderate increase in muscle echogenicity and reduced bone reflection; 4) large increase in muscle echogenicity and no bone reflection.

    Day 1, Day 5, Day 9

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Change in Clinical assessment of muscle strength while patients were in intensive care unit (ICU).

    Day 9, Day 11, Day 16, and Day 27

  • Change in Handgrip strength while patients were in hospital stay.

    Day 9, Day 11, Day 16, and Day 27

  • Change in Functional status while patients were in Intensive Care unit (ICU).

    Day 9, Day 11, Day 16, and Day 27

  • Change in dynamic balance while patients were in hospital stay.

    Day 16, and Day 27

  • Change in independence for activities of daily living while patients were in hospital stay.

    Day 16, and Day 27

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Change in days spent in Mechanical Ventilation.

    Through mechanical ventilation use completion, an average of 9 days

  • Change in days spent in Intensive Care Unit.

    Through Intensive Care Unit stay completion, an average of 11 days

  • Change in days spent in the hospital.

    Through hospital stay completion, an average of 27 days

Study Arms (3)

Control group

OTHER

Patients received the standard physical therapy (SPT) programme only (passive mobilization) twice a day.

Other: Patients received the standard physical therapy (SPT) programme (passive mobilization) twice a day.

Low-frequency NMES group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients submitted to low-frequency NMES and SPT twice a day.

Other: Patients received the standard physical therapy (SPT) programme (passive mobilization) twice a day.Other: Patients received the low-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)

Medium-frequency NMES group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients submitted to medium-frequency NMES and SPT twice a day.

Other: Patients received the standard physical therapy (SPT) programme (passive mobilization) twice a day.Other: Patients received the medium-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)

Interventions

All participants have received standard physical therapy (SPT) sessions based on a passive range of motion mobilization protocol for the lower limbs. It consisted of a bilateral series of 10 repetitions of hip flexion, knee flexion and extension, and ankle flexion and extension. The procedure was performed twice a day: a morning (between 8am - 12pm) and an afternoon session (between 2pm - 6pm).

Control groupLow-frequency NMES groupMedium-frequency NMES group

Electrical stimulation was performed twice a day after SPT. Two electrodes were attached to each thigh at the motor points of the quadriceps muscle. The point halfway between the anterior superior iliac spine and the base of the patella was used as reference and electrodes were placed 15 cm apart each other, 5 cm proximal and 10 cm distal from the reference point. After the first measurement, semi-permanent markers were used to indicate the position of electrodes. Electrical stimulation was performed using a 4-channels device (Sonopuls 492, series 4, Enraf-Nonius®, Rotterdam, Netherlands). The low-frequency protocol consisted of 100 Hz and 400 ms width pulses, delivered in trains of 5 s ON (ramp-up time: 1 s, plateau: 3 s, ramp-down time: 1 s) and 10 s OFF. Sessions had 20 min of duration (total of 40 min/day) and the current amplitude (mA) was adjusted to the identification of visible and palpable contractions and was rectified every 3 min to sustain the initial level of contraction.

Low-frequency NMES group

Electrical stimulation was performed twice a day after SPT. Two electrodes were attached to each thigh at the motor points of the quadriceps muscle. The point halfway between the anterior superior iliac spine and the base of the patella was used as reference and electrodes were placed 15 cm apart each other, 5 cm proximal and 10 cm distal from the reference point. After the first measurement, semi-permanent markers were used to indicate the position of electrodes. Electrical stimulation was performed using a 4-channels device (Sonopuls 492, series 4, Enraf-Nonius®, Rotterdam, Netherlands).The medium-frequency protocol had similar parameters, but a carrier frequency of 2500 Hz and burst frequency of 100 Hz. Sessions had 20 min of duration (total of 40 min/day) and the current amplitude (mA) was adjusted to the identification of visible and palpable contractions and was rectified every 3 min to sustain the initial level of contraction.

Medium-frequency NMES group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \- patients between 18-80 years old admitted in ICU with requirement of mechanical ventilation (MV) for longer than 72 h.

You may not qualify if:

  • non-sedated patients;
  • spinal cord injury;
  • cerebrovascular accident;
  • patients with pacemakers;
  • history of deep vein thrombosis;
  • pregnancy;
  • cardiac complications (history of myocardial infarction or congenital diseases);
  • use of neuromuscular blockers;
  • polytraumatized patients requiring tutor support.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de La Frontera

Temuco, 4780000, Chile

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Guerra-Vega P, Guzman R, Betancourt C, Grage M, Vera C, Artigas-Arias M, Munoz-Cofre R, Vitzel KF, Marzuca-Nassr GN. Medium-Frequency Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Critically Ill Patients Promoted Larger Functional Capacity Improvement During Recovery than Low-Frequency Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation: Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 31;14(15):5407. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155407.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Critical IllnessMuscular Atrophy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeuromuscular ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesAtrophyPathological Conditions, AnatomicalSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Gabriel N Marzuca-Nassr,, PT, MSc, PhD

    Universidad de La Frontera

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2022

First Posted

March 18, 2022

Study Start

August 1, 2019

Primary Completion

January 31, 2020

Study Completion

January 31, 2020

Last Updated

March 18, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Locations