Passive Evaluation in Operational Environment of the AI Clinician Decision Support System for Sepsis Treatment
1 other identifier
observational
15
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Sepsis, or systemic infection, is a common reason for ICU admission and death throughout the world. Despite advances in the way we treat this condition, it remains a significant economic and healthcare burden. A key part of the treatment of sepsis is the administration of IV fluids and blood pressure medication. However, there is huge uncertainty around dosing of these drugs in an individual patient. A tool to personalise these medications could improve patient survival. The study team has developed a new method to automatically and continuously review and recommend the correct medication doses to doctors, which was created using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques applied to large medical databases. The researchers' previous work has shown it has the potential to improve patient survival rates. The tool will be capable of processing patient data within the electronic patient record of NHS hospitals in real-time to suggest a course of action. This tool will be evaluated and refined in simulation studies and then be tested in two NHS Trusts in "shadow mode" (results not provided to duty clinicians). This will allow comparison of actual decisions made and recommended decisions from the AI system. The second stage of this clinical evaluation will display the recommendations to clinicians to assess the acceptability of the tool and confirm technical feasibility to inform future clinical trials. The long-term expected benefits of this project are numerous: improved patient survival, reduced use of precious intensive care resources and reduction in healthcare costs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Mar 2022
Typical duration for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 18, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 24, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2024
CompletedOctober 27, 2023
October 1, 2023
2.4 years
March 1, 2022
October 26, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Data Availability
Data availability: what percentage of essential and optional data fields are available 24/7.
18 months
Anonymised patients' data
Patient demographics (age in years, gender, primary diagnosis) Outcomes: organ function (hourly SOFA), ICU and hospital mortality
18 months
Rate of intravenous fluids administered to patients
Rate of intravenous fluids (millilitres per hour) and vasopressors (noradrenaline equivalent, in micrograms per kilogram per minute) administered to patients.
18 months
Evaluators' data (the doctors assessing the AI in the background)
The evaluator's grade and seniority (i.e. A custom-made interface linked to a database will capture and record the following: * What rate of intravenous fluids (millilitres per hour) and vasopressors (noradrenaline equivalent, in micrograms per kilogram per minute) they would recommend, before and after seeing the AI suggested dose. * Agreement with the AI suggested dose on a Likert scale including the following labels: "the AI suggested dose is:" "certainly too low", "possibly too low","likely appropriate","possibly too high", "certainly too high". After collecting this data, we will report the median difference (with interquartile range) between the AI suggested doses and the evaluator suggested doses, as well as the proportion of AI decisions in each agreement category ("certainly too low", "possibly too low","likely appropriate","possibly too high", "certainly too high").
18 months
System Availability
System availability: delays in generating response 24/7. Number and nature of technical issues (drop-outs, freezes).
18 months
Eligibility Criteria
* Patients: adult septic patients in intensive care. * Human Evaluators: senior registrars, ICU fellows and consultants.
You may qualify if:
- For patients:
- Adult patient \> 18 years old
- Admitted to an intensive care unit
- Likely or confirmed diagnosis of sepsis as per sepsis-3 definition (as defined in the glossary)
- ICU length of stay \> 24h
- For Evaluators:
- \- ICU doctors at the senior registrar, ICU fellow or consultant level
You may not qualify if:
- For patients:
- Not for full active care, e.g. not for vasopressors
- Not expected to survive more than 24h
- Elective surgical admission (these patients are regularly on antibiotics but given as a prophylaxis, with no sepsis)
- Opted-out for use of their data for research (NHS and NHS-X website)
- For both patients and evaluators:
- Declined participation No patient consent is required
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Univeristy College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
Imperial College Hospitals NHS Trust
London, W2 1BL, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2022
First Posted
March 18, 2022
Study Start
March 24, 2022
Primary Completion
August 31, 2024
Study Completion
August 31, 2024
Last Updated
October 27, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share