NCT05287477

Brief Summary

Sepsis, or systemic infection, is a common reason for ICU admission and death throughout the world. Despite advances in the way we treat this condition, it remains a significant economic and healthcare burden. A key part of the treatment of sepsis is the administration of IV fluids and blood pressure medication. However, there is huge uncertainty around dosing of these drugs in an individual patient. A tool to personalise these medications could improve patient survival. The study team has developed a new method to automatically and continuously review and recommend the correct medication doses to doctors, which was created using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques applied to large medical databases. The researchers' previous work has shown it has the potential to improve patient survival rates. The tool will be capable of processing patient data within the electronic patient record of NHS hospitals in real-time to suggest a course of action. This tool will be evaluated and refined in simulation studies and then be tested in two NHS Trusts in "shadow mode" (results not provided to duty clinicians). This will allow comparison of actual decisions made and recommended decisions from the AI system. The second stage of this clinical evaluation will display the recommendations to clinicians to assess the acceptability of the tool and confirm technical feasibility to inform future clinical trials. The long-term expected benefits of this project are numerous: improved patient survival, reduced use of precious intensive care resources and reduction in healthcare costs.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2022

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 1, 2022

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 18, 2022

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 24, 2022

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

October 27, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

March 1, 2022

Last Update Submit

October 26, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Data Availability

    Data availability: what percentage of essential and optional data fields are available 24/7.

    18 months

  • Anonymised patients' data

    Patient demographics (age in years, gender, primary diagnosis) Outcomes: organ function (hourly SOFA), ICU and hospital mortality

    18 months

  • Rate of intravenous fluids administered to patients

    Rate of intravenous fluids (millilitres per hour) and vasopressors (noradrenaline equivalent, in micrograms per kilogram per minute) administered to patients.

    18 months

  • Evaluators' data (the doctors assessing the AI in the background)

    The evaluator's grade and seniority (i.e. A custom-made interface linked to a database will capture and record the following: * What rate of intravenous fluids (millilitres per hour) and vasopressors (noradrenaline equivalent, in micrograms per kilogram per minute) they would recommend, before and after seeing the AI suggested dose. * Agreement with the AI suggested dose on a Likert scale including the following labels: "the AI suggested dose is:" "certainly too low", "possibly too low","likely appropriate","possibly too high", "certainly too high". After collecting this data, we will report the median difference (with interquartile range) between the AI suggested doses and the evaluator suggested doses, as well as the proportion of AI decisions in each agreement category ("certainly too low", "possibly too low","likely appropriate","possibly too high", "certainly too high").

    18 months

  • System Availability

    System availability: delays in generating response 24/7. Number and nature of technical issues (drop-outs, freezes).

    18 months

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

* Patients: adult septic patients in intensive care. * Human Evaluators: senior registrars, ICU fellows and consultants.

You may qualify if:

  • For patients:
  • Adult patient \> 18 years old
  • Admitted to an intensive care unit
  • Likely or confirmed diagnosis of sepsis as per sepsis-3 definition (as defined in the glossary)
  • ICU length of stay \> 24h
  • For Evaluators:
  • \- ICU doctors at the senior registrar, ICU fellow or consultant level

You may not qualify if:

  • For patients:
  • Not for full active care, e.g. not for vasopressors
  • Not expected to survive more than 24h
  • Elective surgical admission (these patients are regularly on antibiotics but given as a prophylaxis, with no sepsis)
  • Opted-out for use of their data for research (NHS and NHS-X website)
  • For both patients and evaluators:
  • Declined participation No patient consent is required

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Univeristy College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom

NOT YET RECRUITING

Imperial College Hospitals NHS Trust

London, W2 1BL, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sepsis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

InfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2022

First Posted

March 18, 2022

Study Start

March 24, 2022

Primary Completion

August 31, 2024

Study Completion

August 31, 2024

Last Updated

October 27, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations